Sure, but the numbers are going to be higher, so still good for apple.
Are you sure they will be higher. That's conjecture.
Sure, but the numbers are going to be higher, so still good for apple.
We don't know if ATT's iPhone sales for this quarter were best ever for the iPhone - we just know that ATT's smartphone sales were best ever
From AppleInsider quoting the actual press release,
"The carrier said on Tuesday that it sold a record number of iPhones in the holiday quarter. AT&T's previous record came in the 2011 holiday quarter, in which it sold 7.6 million iPhones."
Are you sure.
I can't find it on the press release:
http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=23658&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=35923
ETA: Just checked AppleInsider - they are making the same error this site is and not reading the actual press release and/or making leaps...
Or... someone actually spoke with an AT&T representative after the press release!?
Are you sure they will be higher. That's conjecture.
Responsible journalism would have been to cite that. And given that the press release was issued - and that information is outside of that scope - you would think that AppleInsider would want to "boast" the fact they had new/better info.
So no - I think they are making a leap of facts based on their headline. And I think this site just has it wrong period.
Well think what you want. There's no reason to think the iPhone wasn't responsible for 80% of AT&T's smart phone sales as that's what they've always been.
AT&T today announced that it sold over 10 million smartphones during the quarter, including "best-ever" sales of both iPhone and Android devices
Since this is an anouncement from AT&T, doesn't seem like 'conjecture' to me.
edit: Hmm seems I spoke to soon since the actual AT&T announcement didn't break down the sales by phone.
Guess we will wait and see.
Yes. By all means - let's not let facts get in the way of conjecture. I think it's best to wait for the actual numbers. You can feel free to randomly pick numbers/percentages...
Sorry but do they CAP your data? or do they throttle you over a certain amount so that you get what you are paying for with your 2007 unlimited data plan. You are paying for 3G speeds, not LTE. I suggest AT&T let you have 3G unlimited, at the 1mb or less you would have gotten in 2007.
I get 35-40mb/s regularly on AT&T LTE network in Tampa. Should I be allowed unlimited data on the cellular network at that speed. If they did, it would crush the network.
I am flipping sick of clueless people who moan and complain when they can't get stuff for free.
AT&T is clearly investing in faster LTE networks which is not free...
Okay, Debbie Downer, choose to assume the downside. No one really cares if they did or didn't, but why wouldn't anyone just assume they did?
I'm not picking random numbers. The iPhone has always pretty much been 80% of AT&T's smartphone sales. Let's also look at recent reports of Apple pushing past 50% US marketshare and knocking Android down to just over 40%.
You're absolutely right, we won't ACTUALLY know until AT&T releases ACTUAL numbers, but in the meantime, why would you assume otherwise?
Honestly, Samsung NEVER releases ACTUAL numbers and yet no one has a problem believing what all the analysts say with regards to their #1 marketshare.
every damn quarter has been the "best ever" for AT&T
Since when is looking for factual information being a Debbie Downer? If no one cares - why associate my desire for the actual fact with being "depressing"
Assumptions can be made in any direction - they are assumptions.
FYI - the past doesn't equal the present and future. Just because historically it's been 80 percent doesn't mean that's a given....
Seeing that the iPhone just recently surpassed over 50% marketshare in the U.S. for the first time ever and Android continued its slide to 40%, I would find it hard to believe this wouldn't be reflected in AT&T's sales since they sell more iPhones than any other U.S. carrier.
I wouldn't argue that point. That being said - the title of this article and any reference to the fact ATT has stated as such at this point is not accurate.
I wouldn't argue that point. That being said - the title of this article and any reference to the fact ATT has stated as such at this point is not accurate.
From http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=23658&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=35923
"AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) announced today that it sold more than 10 million smartphones in the fourth quarter of 2012, topping its previous record quarter of 9.4 million, set in the fourth quarter of 2011. This included best-ever quarterly sales of Android and Apple smartphones."
See the bit in bold. It makes all the difference imo
Yes. I read that. That doesn't state that it had iPhone record sales. It said combined it had record sales. So what's the confusion? The title of the article MR has is wrong.
I read it as:
We have record smart phone sales. Included in that record is individual sales records for both Android, and Apple devices.
I think you can admit that it would be very odd of them to say that they had record smartphone sales and even if you remove all the other smartphone phone OS's (windows and...?) leaving just ios and android it's still a record!
For one it would be a pointless metric to track
I read it as combined - we've had the best smart phone sales this quarter.
The headline of this article states that ATT has best ever iPhone sales in 4Q. Sorry - but while it might ultimately true - there's no way to cull that from ATT's press release as fact.
I read it as combined - we've had the best smart phone sales this quarter.
The headline of this article states that ATT has best ever iPhone sales in 4Q. Sorry - but while it might ultimately true - there's no way to cull that from ATT's press release as fact.
some of the people here are so funny
ever since the iphones inception it has been a disgustingly overwhelming majority of sales at AT&T, but this will be the quarter where making that extrapolation based on ATTs press release would be wrong
OF COURSE, the iPhone is going to sell close to 8 million at AT&T this quarter. Anyone who's trying to devil's advocate around that is just being silly.
I (and I don't think anyone is arguing) that the iPhone is going to make up the majority of sales. That's not the issue. Do I need to instruct you to read the headline of the article. That's what is what I (personally) object to - because there's no evidence whatsoever that it's true based on the information MR is citing.