Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 14, 2013, 03:48 AM   #26
Caesar_091
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
Most worthless test in all the land.
Totally agree, but hard drive performance seemed poor to me (using both HD and SSD as boot drive on daily tasks) and doing this test I have confirmed my "feelings".

Googleing around there are a lot of post about this but I still haven't found a solution; any idea?
__________________
Mac Pro 1,1 dual Xeon 3GHz 10GB RAM ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series 256GB OWC Mercury Extreme Pro SSD 240GB
Caesar_091 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 06:08 AM   #27
Wardenski
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Mac Pro 3.1 Octo 3 Ghz, 6 GB RAM, Intel 520 250 GB, Sapphire 5870 Toxic 2 GB

CPU: 7.3
RAM: 7.3
GPU: 7.8
Gaming: 7.8
HD: 7.2

This is on Home Premium, I reckon if I had Ultimate I would get 7.8 on CPU.
Wardenski is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 10:54 AM   #28
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
Most worthless test in all the land.

So just how low was your's ?
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:25 AM   #29
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Mine....





__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 12:23 PM   #30
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Stealth View Post
So just how low was your's ?
Just like everyone else's with a fairly modern mechanical HDD, 5.9. All 7.8, 7.9 except the 5.9. With SSD it is 7.8. It's a stupid test to sell you more crap you don't need. Glad MS stayed away from the need to market to customers based on this score. I can see the expanded sticker system now.
Right next to your 'Intel Inside' and AMD 'radforce super power' and your whatever else needs separate marketing.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 12:34 PM   #31
paulrbeers
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
Just like everyone else's with a fairly modern mechanical HDD, 5.9. All 7.8, 7.9 except the 5.9. With SSD it is 7.8. It's a stupid test to sell you more crap you don't need. Glad MS stayed away from the need to market to customers based on this score. I can see the expanded sticker system now.
Right next to your 'Intel Inside' and AMD 'radforce super power' and your whatever else needs separate marketing.
I've always thought this "benchmark" was the biggest waste of time. It tells you almost nothing. Congrats, you scored a "5.1" which means absolutely nothing. It's completely arbitrary. What is a 5.1 mean? What do Benchmarks in general mean nothing because most are synthetic. At least with most benchmarks, you can get a real feel for differences in processors (ie. geekbench), but frankly I haven't seen modern day processors score less than a 7 in a couple of years (other than maybe an Atom).
__________________
MBP 8,2 15" 2.2Ghz w/ 120GB SSD + 500GB
MBA 4,2 13" 1.7Ghz w/ 128GB SSD
Mac Mini 6,2 2.3ghz w/ 240GB SSD + 1TB
Mac Pro 1,1 w/ 8 cores @ 2.66 w/ 240GB SSD
paulrbeers is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 02:27 PM   #32
Wardenski
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
The Windows experience index should go to 11. Why. Because 11 is one more than 10.
Wardenski is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 02:40 PM   #33
GermanyChris
macrumors 68040
 
GermanyChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
In virtual
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2013-01-14 at 9.38.39 PM.png
Views:	10
Size:	32.7 KB
ID:	390285  
__________________
The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad--Nietzsche
GermanyChris is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 03:17 PM   #34
daneoni
macrumors G3
 
daneoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Virtualised environment
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Win 7.png
Views:	31
Size:	279.5 KB
ID:	390295  
__________________
15" MBP Core i7 | 27" ACD | AEBS | 5G iPod | iPhone 5 | 3G Apple TV | iPad mini
daneoni is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 03:54 PM   #35
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Not a benchmark.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wardenski View Post
The Windows experience index should go to 11. Why. Because 11 is one more than 10.

Ha... Actually MS raised the bar to 9.9 with the release of Windows 8.

Plus....

It's not a benchmark nor does MS claim it to be. It's an "Index" nothing more.

__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:24 PM   #36
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
With SSD it is 7.8
Never try to bullsht a bullshter...... Screenshots please....
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:58 PM   #37
elvisizer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
hmmm . . . .why are my 5870's scores so low? weird.
everything else looks fine- boot disk is an OCZ revodrive X2 pci-e SSD raid array.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.JPG
Views:	12
Size:	45.2 KB
ID:	390349  
elvisizer is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 09:02 PM   #38
OrangeSVTguy
macrumors 68040
 
OrangeSVTguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeastern Ohio
Here's mine. Got a 8.1 with the 670s. I only have a single M4 SSD for windows.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	39.8 KB
ID:	390351  
__________________
010011110111001001100001011011100110011101100101010100110101011001010100011001110111010101111001

OrangeSVTguy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 09:39 PM   #39
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeSVTguy View Post
Here's mine. Got a 8.1 with the 670s. I only have a single M4 SSD for windows.

Dang ! Your dual 670s beat my dual 680s 4gb!

Congrats. That's hot....
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:17 PM   #40
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Stealth View Post
Never try to bullsht a bullshter...... Screenshots please....
Why? It is only an 'index'. I can make sht up just like MS

I was just assuming my 840 Pro would net 7.6+ As posts on the net were proclaiming the 256GB pro at 7.9. Thus determining my lowest score of 7.8. The test obviously only cares for single threaded as you have twice my processor (and 52GB more memory and 2x+ the GPU) yet scores the same. I don't have Win on my SSD's right now (they are for OS X, my work OS). It isn't rocket science to cobble together the theoretical result if an SSD was involved as the index is so ridiculous as it is.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:31 PM   #41
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
Why? It is only an 'index'. I can make sht up just like MS

I was just assuming my 840 Pro would net 7.6+ As posts on the net were proclaiming the 256GB pro at 7.9. Thus determining my lowest score of 7.8. The test obviously only cares for single threaded as you have twice my processor (and 52GB more memory and 2x+ the GPU) yet scores the same. I don't have Win on my SSD's right now (they are for OS X, my work OS). It isn't rocket science to cobble together the theoretical result if an SSD was involved as the index is so ridiculous as it is.
Derbothaus.... Go to bed..........
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"

Last edited by Dr. Stealth; Jan 14, 2013 at 11:39 PM.
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:39 PM   #42
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Stealth View Post
Go to bed..........
West Coast. Not yet. That all you got?

(Too bad there is no "grumble, grumble...you're probably right, but still, grumble" emoticon)
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:52 PM   #43
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
West Coast. Not yet. That all you got?

(Too bad there is no "grumble, grumble...you're probably right, but still, grumble" emoticon)
SoCal here too.....

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by derbothaus View Post
West Coast. Not yet. That all you got?

(Too bad there is no "grumble, grumble...you're probably right, but still, grumble" emoticon)
Strange.... I'm beginning to like you......
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:58 PM   #44
OrangeSVTguy
macrumors 68040
 
OrangeSVTguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeastern Ohio
Miss SoCal lol still think I'm pacific time zone sometimes even though I'm back on the east coast.

Did you install the latest drivers for the 680s? I think I have an older version so that may be why? Been going through quite a few older ones to see if SLI can work. Thought SLI would work on the Mac Pro under windows?
__________________
010011110111001001100001011011100110011101100101010100110101011001010100011001110111010101111001

OrangeSVTguy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 12:05 AM   #45
Dr. Stealth
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surf City, USA (Huntington Beach, CA)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeSVTguy View Post
Miss SoCal lol still think I'm pacific time zone sometimes even though I'm back on the east coast.

Did you install the latest drivers for the 680s? I think I have an older version so that may be why? Been going through quite a few older ones to see if SLI can work. Thought SLI would work on the Mac Pro under windows?
I'm running the latest & greatest...... Still very happy.....
__________________
"The Official 2004 Macrumors Newbie"
Dr. Stealth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 03:19 AM   #46
sitec
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Ahci

Finally after changing IDE mode to AHCI....

sitec is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 02:31 PM   #47
derbothaus
macrumors 68040
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Stealth View Post
SoCal here too.....

----------



Strange.... I'm beginning to like you......
Same here Stealth.
Samsung F3 the 5.9 culprit.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ExIndex.JPG
Views:	21
Size:	86.1 KB
ID:	390474  
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680 2GB, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP Mid 2012, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 03:07 AM   #48
Caesar_091
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by sitec View Post
Finally after changing IDE mode to AHCI....

Image
Could you please post some links please?

What Mac are you using?
__________________
Mac Pro 1,1 dual Xeon 3GHz 10GB RAM ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series 256GB OWC Mercury Extreme Pro SSD 240GB
Caesar_091 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 11:54 AM   #49
donw35
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Send a message via AIM to donw35
Mac Mini

running windows in a VM
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	macminiwin7.JPG
Views:	13
Size:	31.0 KB
ID:	390611  
__________________
08 Mac Book Pro, 11 Mac mini 8GB 120SSD, Hack Pro i7 3.2Ghz 5870HD 24GB 120GB SSD, New iPad 4G 64GB, iPhone 4s
donw35 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 12:00 PM   #50
GermanyChris
macrumors 68040
 
GermanyChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
Quote:
Originally Posted by donw35 View Post
running windows in a VM
I'm surprised to see the processor score so low..how many core do you give it?
__________________
The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad--Nietzsche
GermanyChris is online now   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help mbp/window 7 buyer guide x2unleashed MacBook Pro 3 Jul 25, 2011 02:21 PM
Windows 7 experience index MSFTdude Mac mini 0 Jan 18, 2011 03:59 PM
Windows 7 Experience Index for Parallels 6 HDFan Mac Pro 1 Sep 23, 2010 08:11 PM
What is YOUR Windows 7 Experience Index on Bootcamp? DeLoMan Windows, Linux & others on the Mac 1 Nov 17, 2009 08:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC