Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion

View Poll Results: Would you use a touch screen osx ?
Yes 15 20.00%
No 60 80.00%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 15, 2013, 03:45 AM   #1
dazed
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Should OS X be touch screen compatible?

I was playing around with windows 8 and although the touch screen is difficult to use on a vertical pc, one that can lay flat might be fun.

Would anyone use a Mac like this? It would need to be a full osx, not just a ios with a few bells and whistles.
dazed is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 04:19 AM   #2
Schranke
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Denmark
I am happy with it not being compatible.
Apple have an amazing system for that known as iOS.
I think that making OS X compatible would add unnecessary bag ground use and make the system heavier.
2 things i hate.
Schranke is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 04:23 AM   #3
DenBeke
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Antwerp
Please keep things separated!
I'm still nostalgic towards Mac OS X Tiger (or the pre-iOS time.)
DenBeke is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 04:43 AM   #4
bandrews
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Tried out a few Win8 Laptops in Currys/PC World. Apart from hating fingerprints on a big screen (so much harder to clean than an iPhone/iPad and easier to scratch if not Gorilla Glass), the screen wobbles a bit every time you touch it. There's no escaping it with a laptop even with a super tough hinge, they all seemed to wobble.
However, the Win8 advert with the girl making loads of rubbish pictures did make a large tablet/desktop convertible look like a good idea.
bandrews is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 04:54 AM   #5
Skoopman
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Romania
If I want a touchscreen, I'll buy an iPad. I don't want to hold up my arms 12 hours a day on an iMac or anything bigger than an iPad, that's just silly and uncomfortable.
__________________
Macbook Air 13" | 1.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 128GB SSD
Time Capsule 2TB
Apple TV 3
Skoopman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 05:14 AM   #6
Namtaro
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
I've been using Windows 8 on my desktop since the launch (on and off for the first month) and I think a touchscreen is more of an add on. It's not needed and adds nothing beneficial, just kinda cool to use once in a while. What I noticed in Windows 8 is that they added a way for the touchscreen to do the same thing a mouse and keyboard does... it's not any better or worse, it's just... well, different. I'll be getting a touchscreen monitor once a decently priced one comes out. I've been wanting to get an Apple cinema display for a while cause of it's glass panel... easier to clean, no scratches and matte displays looks ugly. Only downside is the fingerprints!

What bandrews is true - the laptops I tried at the Windows Store were ALL wobbly. You just can't get rid of it with something that's light, thin and has a hinge. Most of the standalone touchscreen monitor's I've tried were HEAVY to avoid the monitor from flying backwards after a touch.

That being said, a touchscreen on OSX could be fun, but if it adds another 500 dollars and a ton of bugs, no thanks.
__________________
Late 2011 15" Macbook Pro - 2.4GHz i7 | 256GB Samsung 8 SSD | 16GB Memory | AMD Radeon HD 6770M
iPad Mini - Wifi 32GB iPhone 4 - 16GB
Time Machine on Networked Drive Guide
Namtaro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 05:54 AM   #7
spyguy10709
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: One Infinite Loop, Cupertino CA
I'll just leave this here.


Basically, if they keep OSX desktop friendly, without mucking up the KB+Mouse UI in desktop mode, and add a completely separate touch UI (unlike win8 which gave 10 year old desktops a tablet's UI....) that is triggered by a physical event (moving the display to a tablet) I'd be all for it!
__________________
Last edited by spyguy10709; Tomorrow at 07:10 AM.
spyguy10709 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 07:05 AM   #8
Spikeywan
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
When planning my MacBook Pro purchase, it was something I thought about. Having an iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad, I like the touch interface.

The computers at work have touch screens, and it's handy to be able to poke the screen for an OK, etc, but then they have stupid touch stick mice, which don't work very well at all. Most people who use them become highly proficient in the keyboard commands.

I asked several people, including Apple shop employees, and they all thought that Apple would not go touch screen on the MacBooks. I said I thought that odd, but they all said that you don't need it on a MacBook.

After having my MacBook Pro for a few weeks I see what they mean. Firstly, you really don't want greasy finger marks all over a retina display. And it's a lot harder to clean than an iPad screen.

But the main reason is the track pad. It is so good, it's almost like it reads your mind. With a track pad this good, you simply have no need to want to poke the screen.
__________________
iPhone 3GS, 8 Gb.
iPod Touch, Retina, 64 Gb.
iPad, Retina, 64 Gb.
MacBook Pro, Retina, 2.3 GHz i7 Haswell, 16 Gb RAM, 512 Gb Flash, Mavericks.
Spikeywan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 11:26 AM   #9
Partron22
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
I envision problems when Touchscreen OSX encounters a dual monitor setup; especially if a user decides to go w a 1-horizontal-w-touch, 1-vertical-w-mouse configuration. Apple has yet to give us decent dual monitor support without having an additional touch-variable thrown into the mix.
Partron22 is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 03:48 PM   #10
Valkyre
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
hell no, we got iOS for that and i don't want a computer that i have to transform every time i want to type a few words... thats just stupid and inconvenient.
Valkyre is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 09:28 PM   #11
Namtaro
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spikeywan View Post
But the main reason is the track pad. It is so good, it's almost like it reads your mind. With a track pad this good, you simply have no need to want to poke the screen.
That's a VERY good point. The trackpad on OS X is just amazing - especially the gestures. When I moved laptops from Windows to OS X, a large glass trackpad was one of the main reasons and I thought the gestures was just a gimmick. Almost a year later of using my Macbook I can't live without them!
Even trying out a couple of friend's new Windows laptops with large glass trackpads... it just isn't the same.
__________________
Late 2011 15" Macbook Pro - 2.4GHz i7 | 256GB Samsung 8 SSD | 16GB Memory | AMD Radeon HD 6770M
iPad Mini - Wifi 32GB iPhone 4 - 16GB
Time Machine on Networked Drive Guide
Namtaro is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2013, 09:32 PM   #12
Tech198
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia, Perth
No way in the world...

It makes no sense combing a keyboard and touch together.

Evertime i see reviews or podcasts, of peiple docking the Surface, and touching it in addtion to typing, i snarl......... ..

Its like they dunno which to use..... But its simple..

You have keyboard docked, use keyboard "It now a computer"

Its its a tablet, then its touch..


So, if this became a "Mac thing", then i wouldn't really care, coz i use it how it should be used, either way.
__________________
13" MBPR, i5, 256Gig SDD, 8 Gig Ram, Apple TV, iPhone 5S 16Gig, iPad 16Gig, Mac Mini 2.3Ghz i7, 1TB HD
"There are no stupid questions, just stupid people."
Tech198 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2013, 09:59 PM   #13
Mal67
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Oz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech198 View Post
No way in the world...

It makes no sense combing a keyboard and touch together.

Evertime i see reviews or podcasts, of peiple docking the Surface, and touching it in addtion to typing, i snarl......... ..

Its like they dunno which to use..... But its simple..

You have keyboard docked, use keyboard "It now a computer"

Its its a tablet, then its touch..


So, if this became a "Mac thing", then i wouldn't really care, coz i use it how it should be used, either way.
We used a touch enabled ultrabook for more than one meeting this week. I thought we made good use of the touch capability. I expect Apple to release at least one touch enabled computer this year. However not having a macbook with the newer trackpad on it I can't say whether it would have been as effective during these meetings as a touch enabled macbook if they
had released one.
Mal67 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 10:52 AM   #14
laudern
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namtaro View Post
That's a VERY good point. The trackpad on OS X is just amazing - especially the gestures. When I moved laptops from Windows to OS X, a large glass trackpad was one of the main reasons and I thought the gestures was just a gimmick. Almost a year later of using my Macbook I can't live without them!
Even trying out a couple of friend's new Windows laptops with large glass trackpads... it just isn't the same.
Prior to buying me 09 macbook i put aside money for a mouse, as I always hated trackpads on every laptop I'd used before.

As soon as I used the macbook trackpad I knew i wouldn't need a mouse. The drag lock, easy 2 finger scrolling and expose (now MC) make it beautiful to use.
laudern is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 11:03 AM   #15
Michael Goff
macrumors 68040
 
Michael Goff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
No.

Contrary to popular belief, they'd have to completely remake the UI to make it work well with a touch screen. I really don't think they'd really do enough work to make a touch screen actually have a point.

Tim Cook hates his fridges and toasters being merged, after all.
__________________
13" Macbook Air (2012) Ultimate
OS X 10.10 DP7
Michael Goff is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 11:43 AM   #16
walkie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
No. Common desktop OS's are not prepared to tap on them, UI elements are too tiny to be handled for our fingertips, in the end the UI must be optimised for it, the way to go is make iOS more powerful and make bigger tablet computers with lots of RAM and CPU power and of course applications that take advantage of it, for example dragging a window on the screen with my fingers doesn't make much sense to me.
walkie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 12:19 PM   #17
Krazy Bill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkie View Post
for example dragging a window on the screen with my fingers doesn't make much sense to me.
Aren't you doing this already by dragging your fingers across a track pad?

And I don't understand your other points. whatever...

I think this is a half-assed poll. Why would anyone in their right minds want to fight gravity with their hands flapping in the air for extended periods of time? (Even jobs said as much at a keynote).

The concept of touching the screen only works if you changed the hardware so it can be held flat. All the Windows based hybrids do this now where the machine can double as a tablet.

So the question should be... should Apple come up with their own hybrid? I believe they should and I'll bet a dollar that somebody there is exploring this.
Krazy Bill is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 01:06 PM   #18
Spikeywan
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Going back to 3 finger dragging, it's even easier than I first thought! You move the pointer with 1 finger, then start dragging with 3. But, if you take your hand off, it stays in drag mode, so as long as you put 3 fingers back on the pad, you can continue to drag - even if you've moved away from the correct drag 'handle'. If you put one or 2 fingers on the pad, it immediately switches to the correct mode.

Really, the Apple track pad is so awesome it makes touch screens totally unnecessary.
__________________
iPhone 3GS, 8 Gb.
iPod Touch, Retina, 64 Gb.
iPad, Retina, 64 Gb.
MacBook Pro, Retina, 2.3 GHz i7 Haswell, 16 Gb RAM, 512 Gb Flash, Mavericks.
Spikeywan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 05:47 PM   #19
walkie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazy Bill View Post
Aren't you doing this already by dragging your fingers across a track pad?

And I don't understand your other points. whatever...

Yes, but on a track pad is different because:
1) You're moving your finger on a horizontal surface
2) Your finger travels a short distance when dragging across a track pad

You don't understand my other points??? there is no mistery on them.
walkie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 09:23 PM   #20
Drew017
macrumors 65816
 
Drew017's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: East coast, USA
Send a message via Skype™ to Drew017
No, because of the simple fact that I like to keep screen clean

----------

I think that Apple needs to keep touch screens away from the Mac, because it just doesn't really make much sense with the OS X UI. At least for now…

I for one love the multitouch trackpad in my MBA. It's just as good as a touchscreen in my opinion, because it's almost as responsive and the gestures are very fluid and make a lot of sense with the OS.
__________________
Who'll put on my shoes while I'm walking slowly down the hall of fame?
MacBook Air 13 inch (Mid 2013); Intel Core i5; 4GB RAM; OS X 10.10 Yosemite
Focusrite Scarlett 2i2
Drew017 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2013, 10:18 PM   #21
WhackyNinja
macrumors 68000
 
WhackyNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Send a message via Skype™ to WhackyNinja
Just saying...if they make OS X touch screen compatible with ANY Mac (iMac, Macbook) All I will have to say is this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdh_ISiBC-I
__________________
13'' MacBook Pro (Late 2011); OS X Yosemite Beta 2; Windows 8.1
Google Nexus 5 32GB; Android 4.4.4

"Am I a good man?" -The Twelfth Doctor
WhackyNinja is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2013, 01:26 AM   #22
Krazy Bill
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkie View Post
Yes, but on a track pad is different because:
1) You're moving your finger on a horizontal surface
Which allows you to rest your palm instead of elevating your whole arm and subjecting it to fatigue. Which is better? (rhetorical: don't answer).

Quote:
2) Your finger travels a short distance when dragging across a track pad
Yes. Another reason why the trackpad is better. Thank you.
Krazy Bill is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2013, 04:37 AM   #23
Spikeywan
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazy Bill View Post
Which allows you to rest your palm instead of elevating your whole arm and subjecting it to fatigue. Which is better?
There's only one way to find out. Fiiiiiiiiiiiiight!

http://youtu.be/Np6gyUb0E7o
__________________
iPhone 3GS, 8 Gb.
iPod Touch, Retina, 64 Gb.
iPad, Retina, 64 Gb.
MacBook Pro, Retina, 2.3 GHz i7 Haswell, 16 Gb RAM, 512 Gb Flash, Mavericks.
Spikeywan is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aftermarket 5s Home Buttons Touch ID Compatible daudi81 iPhone Accessories 3 Feb 10, 2014 07:19 PM
iPhone 5 Touch Screen Twice as Fast as Android Touch Screen MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 329 Dec 16, 2013 06:54 PM
iPod touch 5th 16GB compatible case zepica iPod touch Accessories 6 Jun 28, 2013 05:11 PM
Docks compatible with iPod Touch 5G gcrr iPod touch Accessories 9 Nov 23, 2012 02:09 PM
Microsoft Touch Mouse compatible with OSX? dsah Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 0 Oct 27, 2012 09:19 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps