How dare I? Well I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights to free speech...to say my opinion. Just because you disagree with mine, don't lose your testosterone over it bud....
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple to Launch 128 GB iPad on February 5 for $799/$929
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
How dare I? Well I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights to free speech...to say my opinion. Just because you disagree with mine, don't lose your testosterone over it bud....
The Surface Pro is precisely what I'm talking about. Its case detaches and becomes a full keyboard and trackpad plus it's a touchscreen and runs the full Windows8 plus tablet apps of the regular surface AND costs under $1000 to start with an i5 CPU (the same one in the bottom of the line Macbook Pro). Other than limited SSD storage on the bottom line model and no Thunderbolt (which I couldn't care less about on my own Mac), it's precisely what I'm talking about.
You and your "bridge" belong in some other Universe because your statements certainly aren't supported by reality in this one. Now please stop wasting my time.
Do you really think so? just compare the price/specs of older version of the iPod with the newer models over time, or MBPs, iMacs, etc, how better specs replace older models while maintaining the same price.
My evidence is simple, they upgraded the iPhone to an A6, it wouldn't take much to convert the A6 to an A6X using their experience on the A5X. That's a no brainer. And they had to do something to differentiate it from the 30 pin iPad 3. To simply change the connector would have pissed everyone off just as much as the ipad 4 did. There would have had to be two versions of the ipad in stores. A 3 with 30 pin and a 3 with lighting. It would have been confusing and more for stores to stock. That would not work.
There won't be a March upgrade. That's obvious. They got that upgrade out with the 128gb model. The next upgrade comes summer/fall, with the mini restyle. Course, I don't think the mini 2 will have retina, maybe an A6 processor and 1gb ram. Maybe.
----------
Is this supposed to be a plus? Windows 8 (RT) is HORRIBLE!
Pretty snarky considering you ARE in an iPad forum talking about Microsoft's toy Surface.
----------
Not a chance.
It didn't occur to me because it's not true. Making some other product affordable has nothing to do with Apple's costs. Apple are paying somewhere between 15 and 20 cents a GB for flash. Their margins are huge. But people pay them, for now.
----------
Indeed, that's a good idea. But with most Apple products, and probably all of them in the future, you don't and won't have that option.
Great product - the "keyboard" is mostly a gimmick that comes at additional cost and only 1/3 of advertised storage is available to the end user. Great product, Microsoft! LOL
When you get one, be sure to let us know how wonderful it is.
Macbook Pro? No.
11" Macbook Air.
The S°Pro has the same 17W dual-core 1.7GHz Core i5-3317U as the entry level $999 MBA.
The S°Pro is limited to 4GB of RAM (8GB for the 11" MBA), and 128GB of SSD (512GB for the 11" MBA).
But the S°Pro offers multitouch and a 1080p display.
Oh, the $899 entry price point (64GB) is without keyboard cover ($119/129).
Yeah well, they used to call the 13" Macbook just a Macbook. It seems anything is "Pro" these days at Apple even when the specs don't seem to agree.
OK, so it's a touch-screen Macbook Air equivalent and I want touchscreen on a 13" and 15" Macbook Pro (although obviously the air is even thinner and therefore more comparable to a pad to begin with in size). I still don't see the issue. My Brother MFC-J835DW printer has a touch-screen on it even and I only paid $99 for it. I seriously doubt it would cost Apple more than a hundred bucks or so to add the feature and probably a lot less. This would be a good place to start as it costs them almost nothing to implement (same with iMacs as well; there is no reason NOT to do it, IMO) Designing the lid/case so it's reversible as a pad would be a bit trickier, but it's already been done before so it's not exactly rocket science.
640k should be enough for everybody.
Seriously, I don't care about details that can easily be altered by the engineering design team at a slight cost increase. The point is Microsoft has beaten Apple to the punch on a no-brainer evolution of the iOS/OSX concept. What would I rather have? A $1400 notebook/pad combo or a $1100 notebook plus a $600-900 pad? It's an unnecessary duplication of technology at this point. I'm sure Apple would prefer to sell you two units instead of one, though.
Great product - the "keyboard" is mostly a gimmick that comes at additional cost and only 1/3 of advertised storage is available to the end user. Great product, Microsoft! LOL
When you get one, be sure to let us know how wonderful it is.
You mean more of a gimmick than having to type with a god-awful touch-screen keyboard?
As for the space thing, I'm sorry but that's not a Microsoft-centric issue. If you were to load OSX proper onto a 64GB notebook, you'd find a significant amount of that 64GB of space taken up by the operating system also. And until the recent announcement, you couldn't hope to get a 128GB iPad either. My last drive that was 64GB or smaller on a computer was in maybe 1999 when I had a 40GB drive to start? Oh wait. That was an 80GB drive....
None of this is relevant to the idea of simply adding touch-screen capabilities to a Macbook (whatever model) or even an iMac. As long as you still retain the options for a trackpad and/or mouse, it could always be handy for something (anything from cockpit controls on a flight simulator to playing Bejeweled 3 at a pace that is only achievable on an iOS device not to mention Launchpad would make a lot more sense).
But instead of people recognizing that what Microsoft has delivered here is a good idea, they'd rather defend the current status of Apple's products...until the day Apple does release what will basically be the same thing more or less and then the fanboys will praise it to no end in the usual hypocritical fashion.
Well it's a nice device that can do much more than iOS. I have it and the keyboard is fantastisk and the trackpad also. Eventhough it's hard to get used to, that it doesnt have alle the functions my MBA has
Well it's a nice device that can do much more than iOS. I have it and the keyboard is fantastisk and the trackpad also. Eventhough it's hard to get used to, that it doesnt have alle the functions my MBA has
I have used the Surface RT. It's horrible. Windows 8 is worse than Vista was when it was released. Too many sharp edges on the tablet. Plus I've seen a few reports of that flexible keyboard falling apart at the seems. Cute idea poorly implemented. I am not impressed.
Does anyone know if you'll just be able to order it on Feb. 5 or if you can pick one up on Feb 5?
Sure they are "allowed" to increase the specs of existing Products, however when thats all the company has done over the past 3 years, you cant question why people feel apple hasnt been innovative enough.
Nearly every new Product launch has been a slight refresh (if you can even call it that) of an existing Product.
Example?
iPhone
iPad
iPod
Not a single major redesign.
Last edited by a moderator:
So... how would you change the iPad (hardware wise)?
Last edited by a moderator:
In my opinion Apple should refine and develop holographic technology. They certainly have the capital, and by doing so they would be the first to market with a truly revolutionary product.
That sounds cool, but it doesn't sound like it'd actually help in any meaningful way.
And what makes you thing that they don't have that in their Skunkworks division?
I'm sure they do have it in test, somewhere someplace...But in this market, it's all about speed, and that's what they've clearly been lacking.
Speed to market! Apple lacks speed to Market. They've relied on tweaking existing products rather than coming up with new ones.
- Status