Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:38 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Intel Set-Top Box and Cable TV Service Won't Initially Revolutionize the Industry




At today's AllThingsD Dive Into Media Conference, Intel Media vice president Erik Huggers announced that the company is indeed working on an Internet TV service and a set-top box to go along with it.

Huggers noted that Intel has put together a team of people hired from Apple, Netflix, and Google to work in a new Intel Media group devoted to developing an Internet television platform.

Rumors of an Intel set-top box and TV service began circulating in late December. The setup was said to be similar to what Apple offers with its Apple TV, but with access to cable networks and and a la carte content. Huggers confirmed today that Intel will be offering cable content, but not in a piece meal format as expected.
Quote:
For the first time we will deliver a new consumer electronics product under a new brand. We'll offer consumers a box and they'll buy this directly from us. It'll be an Intel-powered device with fantastic industrial design. But it's not just a device. We're working with the entire industry to figure out how we get live TV to consumers over the Internet.
Intel is planning its service as an all-in-one solution that will incorporate live TV, catch-up TV, and on-demand TV. "We're shooting for a service that incorporates literally everything. ... But Rome wasn't built in a day. It'll take time," Huggers said.

Like Intel, Apple has been rumored to be working on a similar set up for its users, speaking with cable services like Comcast and Time Warner Cable, but Apple has struggled to secure content deals.

It is likely that Intel has had similar problems gaining entry into the cable TV market as content providers have been hesitant to offer television channels piece meal. Though earlier rumors suggested Intel would serve up individual channels a la carte, Huggers says that the company is taking a different approach.

Intel will provide the same bundled content that cable services offer, but over the internet, and he does not expect it to be less expensive.

Intel's proposal is similar to traditional cable offerings, and not the piece meal cable revolution that was expected when the project was originally announced. "We believe that there is value in bundles, if bundles are done right," he said, as noted by TechCrunch.

Though Intel is beginning with a more traditional cable model, the company remains interested in changing the way that cable is delivered in the future.

According to Huggers, the unnamed project will launch later this year.

Article Link: Intel Set-Top Box and Cable TV Service Won't Initially Revolutionize the Industry
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:40 PM   #2
kwikdeth
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
cable companies will never, ever allow a la carte because then customers will find out how badly they've been getting screwed over for the last 20 years.
kwikdeth is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:42 PM   #3
Squilly
macrumors 68020
 
Squilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PA
Will be an interesting change in the television market.
__________________
iPhone 6 16gb Space Gray Sprint
iPad Air 16gb with LTE AT&T (T-Mobile SIM)
Squilly is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:42 PM   #4
HiRez
macrumors 601
 
HiRez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western US
So we pay the same as for cable, but with the inherent unreliability, lag, data caps, and higher compressed, lower-quality video of going through the internet? Sounds awesome.
__________________
Go outside, the graphics are amazing!
HiRez is offline   19 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:42 PM   #5
Yvan256
macrumors 601
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Anything that tries to work with the cable and satellite companies instead of dealing directly with the media creators is bound to fail.

The Internet is the new channel to move content, we don't need the cable companies to be anything else than ISPs. The 1950's called and they want their money-making scheme back.
Yvan256 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:42 PM   #6
the-oz-man
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
"According to Huggers, the unnamed project will launch later this year."

. . . and fail shortly thereafter.
__________________
Stuff and unfortunately more stuff . . .
the-oz-man is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:44 PM   #7
princetanha
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
I don't watch TV by the way -_-
princetanha is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:44 PM   #8
joshsand66
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
internet overload?

Have they considered the effect of this proposal?
If millions of people used a set top box like this would the Internet be able to cope with the demand.
Why can't the same idea use TV frequencies instead.
joshsand66 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:44 PM   #9
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Won't revolutionize the industry - true or not - is editorializing the article.

He did take a swipe at Jobs/Apple though with the latter part of this quote

"We have been working for around a year now to setup Intel Media -- it's a new division that includes a lot of people from outside of the company. We've hired people from Apple, Netflix, Google, BBC, etc. We're aiming to develop an internet television platform. My opinion is that not many of those rivals have cracked it -- have truly delivered."
samcraig is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:47 PM   #10
Yvan256
macrumors 601
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshsand66 View Post
Have they considered the effect of this proposal?
If millions of people used a set top box like this would the Internet be able to cope with the demand.
Why can't the same idea use TV frequencies instead.
Just like today's Internet isn't fast enough for on-demand video for everyone, you have to remember that it wasn't fast enough for things like YouTube two decades ago either.

ISPs will be forced to upgrade their systems. It's high time that they put the millions and billions of profits to good use instead of pocketing it like Scrooge McDuck.
Yvan256 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:48 PM   #11
Mad Mac Maniac
macrumors 68040
 
Mad Mac Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A little bit of here and a little bit of there.
What's with the title? Editorial?

The tone of the content doesn't even match the title....
__________________
Now I have a Signature!
iPod owner since 2006 | Mac owner since 2007
iPhone owner since 2008 | iPad owner since 2011
Apple TV owner since 2012 | Apple Watch owner since 2016 (anticipated)
Mad Mac Maniac is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:53 PM   #12
rjohnstone
macrumors 68030
 
rjohnstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PHX, AZ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mac Maniac View Post
What's with the title? Editorial?

The tone of the content doesn't even match the title....
Click bait... we always fall for it too.
__________________
"You can't really dust for vomit" - Nigel Tuffnel
Some Apple *****, some Android ***** and some Windows based *****.
rjohnstone is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:55 PM   #13
Renzatic
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Who puts the washers in the woods?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yvan256 View Post
Anything that tries to work with the cable and satellite companies instead of dealing directly with the media creators is bound to fail.

The Internet is the new channel to move content, we don't need the cable companies to be anything else than ISPs. The 1950's called and they want their money-making scheme back.
The problem with that is the media creators are bound to the networks, which are bound to the cable and satellite companies, who like providing channels to you in big bulk packages because it nets them tons of cash both from subscription fees and advertisements, which they then cycle back to the media creators to make their movies and shows so they can make even more money off of them.

The TV industry is a very tightly knit system that works very, very well for those directly involved in it. As of right now, there are no internet based services that provide as much money as good old fashioned television.
Renzatic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:55 PM   #14
HiRez
macrumors 601
 
HiRez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western US
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mac Maniac View Post
What's with the title? Editorial?

The tone of the content doesn't even match the title....
Yeah, I don't get that. Where's the part that says it won't work? Well, I don't think it will work, but I don't see it in the article.
__________________
Go outside, the graphics are amazing!
HiRez is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:56 PM   #15
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mac Maniac View Post
What's with the title? Editorial?

The tone of the content doesn't even match the title....
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjohnstone View Post
Click bait... we always fall for it too.
Maybe we can add this to every headline (like "in bed" for chinese fortune cookies)

IE

Apple Patents Nearly Invisible 'Microslot Antennas' Allowing for Smaller Devices - Won't Revolutionize the Industry

Tim Cook at Goldman Sachs Conference: Retail Philosophy, Acquisitions, and the Apple Ecosystem Won't Revolutionize the Industry

Apple Exploring Alternatives to Traditional Passwords with Photo Identification as Authentication Won't Revolutionize the Industry
samcraig is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:58 PM   #16
smoledman
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Even Apple can't break the cable/satellite hegemony over the pipes. So we're stuck until we get legislation that breaks them up.
smoledman is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 02:58 PM   #17
topmounter
macrumors 68000
 
topmounter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: FEMA Region VIII
Quote:
"...But Rome wasn't built in a day."




What? Really? I had no idea.
__________________
iLoveDrones.com
topmounter is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:01 PM   #18
Moonjumper
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincoln, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikdeth View Post
cable companies will never, ever allow a la carte because then customers will find out how badly they've been getting screwed over for the last 20 years.
My Mum is on a higher cost TV cable package just for 1 channel, but it is a channel she watches a lot, but maybe not for much longer as she has seen most of the content on that channel. A la carte would be a brilliant for her, and the cable company might get to keep some business.

It is cheaper for me to get the Blu-Ray or DVD of the series I want rather than a cable package. A la carte would be a brilliant for me, and the cable company would get some business from me.

Packaging channels raises the value of some customers, but I'm sure it keeps many away.

TV companies than embrace the new options stand a massive chance of leading the race into the future, but stand still for fear of losing their existing (and diminishing) market. But would they really lose out?
Moonjumper is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:08 PM   #19
chuckd83
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by princetanha View Post
I don't watch TV by the way -_-
nobody cares.
chuckd83 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:08 PM   #20
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
Won't revolutionize the industry - true or not - is editorializing the article.

He did take a swipe at Jobs/Apple though with the latter part of this quote

"We have been working for around a year now to setup Intel Media -- it's a new division that includes a lot of people from outside of the company. We've hired people from Apple, Netflix, Google, BBC, etc. We're aiming to develop an internet television platform. My opinion is that not many of those rivals have cracked it -- have truly delivered."
One we don't know what Jobs meant when he said he "cracked it" and two, I don't think anyone believes the current ATV is Apple's grand vision when it comes to the TV space. If anything he's taking a swipe at Google TV and Samsung's Smart TV.
__________________
"I have a very optimistic view of individuals. As individuals, people are inherently good. I have a somewhat more pessimistic view of people in groups." -- Steve Jobs , Wired interview
Rogifan is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:10 PM   #21
Chrjy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
I'm from the UK and as far as I'm concerned the UK needs to focus their efforts on telecommunications before anything else, we're so far behind in this area it's now becoming a joke.

Without the proper technology in place initially (because the telecommunication companies are so tight!) the option of quality TV internet services and the like are far from our reach....obviously a UK based opinion only!
Chrjy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:11 PM   #22
d21mike
macrumors 68020
 
d21mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Torrance, CA
I don't care how the content is delivered to the house. I just want a better way to search and organize that content on the 9 TV's in my house. The problem for me is having to pay for 9 STB's if I want all channels on each TV plus if I want Netflix / iTunes I then need 9 ATV's. I want to have my Network Tuners (with CableCards) in 1 room that will feed my ATV's (or Intel box or Google TV box) which can combine all of the content in a customizable UI.

I think everyone needs to understand if we went with all Internet TV our Internet Cost are going to go up. You have to increase bandwidth to hand multiple TV's streaming HD Channels at the same time in every household.
__________________
Mike
d21mike is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:12 PM   #23
jchase2057
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Detroit
I haven't had cable in years. Everything is available online. To me it's much more enjoyable to watch a season of a show without any commercials or a week or more between episodes. And the ones that are currently airing, I still get to watch them every week.
__________________
MacBook 1.83 Core Duo
1GB RAM
180GB Intel 530 Series SSD
OS X 10.6.8
jchase2057 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:13 PM   #24
Renzatic
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Who puts the washers in the woods?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
One we don't know what Jobs meant when he said he "cracked it" and two, I don't think anyone believes the current ATV is Apple's grand vision when it comes to the TV space. If anything he's taking a swipe at Google TV and Samsung's Smart TV.
I dunno. Using the word "cracked" seems to be a direct jab at ole Steve there.

Though the sad truth of the whole situation is that it doesn't matter who has the best concept for the future of television, or who has the best UI, best delivery service. The content providers hold all the cards here. If they don't want to play along, even the most brilliant ideas will wither on the vine.
Renzatic is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 03:14 PM   #25
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
One we don't know what Jobs meant when he said he "cracked it" and two, I don't think anyone believes the current ATV is Apple's grand vision when it comes to the TV space. If anything he's taking a swipe at Google TV and Samsung's Smart TV.
I disagree. No other company has claimed to have "cracked" the TV thing.

You don't know context of what Jobs' comment meant. He said that he cracked it. This guy is saying that no one has cracked it (yet) or has delivered.

I don't think he means Apple TV was supposed to be what cracked TV.

He's making a general statement - that, to date, no one has cracked anything. IE - the proof is in the pudding. Or "talk is cheap."

He's drawing a line in the sand and saying he believes intel will be the first to market with something unique. And in his mind - "cracks" it.
samcraig is offline   3 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Government regulators who killed net neutrality became top cable industry lobbyists macUser2007 Politics, Religion, Social Issues 17 Jan 20, 2014 06:19 PM
set top box to macbook pro inscrewtable Mac Peripherals 1 Nov 21, 2013 01:48 AM
Amazon Developing Competitor to Apple TV Set-Top Box MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 121 Apr 30, 2013 04:24 PM
Intel to Launch Cable TV Service and Set Top Box at CES 2013 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 135 Apr 10, 2013 09:26 AM
Apple in Talks to Build Cable Set-Top Box to Display Live Television MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 247 Aug 18, 2012 04:02 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC