The MS tribe and their sycophants call it a tablet when they want to knock the iPad (iPad is just a toy, Surface can do real work). Then it magically turns into an Ultrabook and it gets compared to a MacBook Air when someone complains about battery life, weight etc.
Well it has a better screen, keyboard, hardware, performance, OS, for about the same money, and it has a touch screen and can be used as a tablet. THe MBA is an outdated laptop with its low res screen.
I'd low to know how many people are getting real work done using a legacy x86 application on the Surface in tablet form. Yeah using Microsoft Excel while tapping the screen with my finger or a stylus sounds like a lot of fun. Even with the type cover I can't see myself getting a lot of work done on a 10" 16:9 screen.
So X86 is now " legacy " besides the fact that its the most used in the world? By a massive margin?
When have we ever seen the Surface pictured sans keyboard in portrait orientation (the way most people would use a tablet to read a book/magazine)? As a matter of fact we rarely see the Surface in landscape orientation with out the kickstand and keyboard attached.
That depends on the user, I own a Surface pro, its landscape mode works just fine.
I see no real reason to buy the Surface over an Ultrabook that gets better battery life, has an adjustable screen and doesn't need to be used on a completely flat surface (can be used on your lap). What makes the Surface better than a Lenovo or Ausu touch screen Ultrabook?
Do what I did, and just buy both, its 1000 dollars, not a large amount of money.