|
|
#26 | |
|
Quote:
They were using thousands of Macs to make super computers a long ways back
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#27 |
|
right, but it's you that didn't read between the lines and assumed...
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Depends what you call a server.
I know enough companies that use a Mac mini "server" running DeployStudio to make it easy to host Mac images.
__________________
Steve Jobs. 1955 - 2011. My Hero. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#29 |
|
In my (small) business an Xserve has been running since Sep 2007 flawlessly. Yes, as apple discontinued Xserve we have a new backup strategy and an external Mac professional looks remotely after the system.
The reason why not more Xserves were sold to corporates may simply be that once IT guys get trained on windows they stick with it. I was previously in a 1500 people biz and the IT guys fought Mac with their teeth and claws.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#30 |
|
no, it's because it costs several times more than a windows or *nix equivalent
if all corporate IT was trained on windows, then you wouldn't see linux used for servers |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Until a few months ago I worked for a satellite broadcaster that runs exclusively on XServes (well apart from the edit suites of course which are all MacPro's running FCP). Main server storage is an XSan, all chosen mainly for its reliability and in two years we rarely had any major issues with it.
Even the live main and backup transmission servers are all XServes running OSX Server live out to the world. Works pretty well for us
|
|
|
|
1
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.








Linear Mode
