|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Apple Updates Anti-Malware Software to Block Older Versions of Adobe Flash Player Plug-in
![]() As noted by Jim Dalrymple of The Loop, Apple today updated its malware definition file "Xprotect.plist" to block older versions of Adobe Flash Player in Safari. Versions of Flash that come before the latest 11.6.602.171 update will be automatically blacklisted. ![]() Quote:
In recent weeks, Apple has aggressively used its anti-malware tools to enforce minimum plug-in versions in light of security issues affecting the software. Recent blocks have included a previous Flash Player update enforcement in early February, and several blocks of Oracle's Java 7 Web plug-in earlier this year. Article Link: Apple Updates Anti-Malware Software to Block Older Versions of Adobe Flash Player Plug-in |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The safest way is still to uncheck the "Enable plug-ins" and "Enable Java" options in Safari.
__________________
The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time. -Tom Cargill, Bell Labs. |
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#3 |
|
uNless you actually need java, like some people- myself included.
__________________
Quicker than two shakes of a lambs tail
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Agreed. Same here.
__________________
-David Think 8-bit.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Another Reason why Jobs was against Flash
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Flash I still need... sometimes. ClickToFlash Safari extension to the rescue!
Java (at least in the browser where it's a problem) I don't need ever. Security holes... I also don't need ever. I like this peace of mind. Apple's system means I will be secure without having to think about it. And if I ever REALLY want to use an older, insecure Flash, I have Firefox or Chrome to fall back on. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Blocking by default is OK, but I wish it still allowed me to make an exception. I didn't have time to update Flash this morning, but I wanted to watch a short video on the BBC website, but couldn't because it had been blocked.
I'm used to Gmail hiding the content of a suspicious email, but it still allows me the option to view it. This should be the behaviour regarding the plugin.
__________________
ShootStorm - universal neo-retro iOS shoot-em-up action ShootStorm Survival - free single-life version |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
![]() What are you doing to convey to the software vendor that it is urgent to upgrade their service to eliminate the need for Java in the browser? |
||
|
|
5
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
Finance. 80% of our sites use it.
__________________
Quicker than two shakes of a lambs tail
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Quote:
As far as we can tell, it's simply a matter of complacency and laziness that is leaving your site with the risky implementation. You seem to not realize: apathy by businesses like yours is what is keeping this problem in place. Are you perhaps hoping that Java will someday be secure? |
||
|
|
4
|
|
|
#12 |
|
what exactly is java used for? I'm new to mac's also and not really sure how to enable or disable java lol
i do have flash player running on my mbp thanks
__________________
go #88 go
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Adobe FlashPlayer has been a pain lately.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
If it wasn't for a handful of sites I need to access that still require Flash, I would have already got rid of it. Same would apply to JAVA.
I really hope all sites start supporting HTML5/CSS3 soon. ---------- Quote:
Java is not the same as JavaScript, which is supported by Safari. No need to worry about JavaScript.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro (2007) iPad 3G / new iPad LTE 64GB AppleTV 2 ![]() Follow @AmazingIceman for useful tech info and more (mention MacRumors). |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Quote:
You can argue all day long that Java/Flash/plugins shouldn't be necessary, but it doesn't change the fact that remotely disabling stuff with no opt-out or even warning is NOT okay.
__________________
PowerBook G5, 1.67GHz MacBook Pro, iPhone Nano, iPhone 6, Apple Television Set
|
||
|
|
7
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Quote:
Unless Oracle somehow self-destructs, Java isn't going away anytime soon. Heck, even CrashPlan Pro (the supposed gold standard in Mac backup that Apple uses on 27,000 of its campus computers) uses a Java client to run. That's right - read it: Apple uses Java on nearly every desktop computer on their campus. |
||
|
|
4
|
|
|
#18 |
|
At least someone tried to protect their users more than others. *Cough*Microsoft*Cough
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I guess the few people who still use Safari on a computer will get a pop up soon. This thing should go and join Ping
__________________
30 Cinema display, macmini i5 2.5, 16gig, OCZ V2 240GB SSD, MiniStack 2TB X2 VAIO Z i7-QM MacPro 8Core 2.4Xeon
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Quote:
Ok I will convey your ideas to all the banking sites I use for my daily job. Maybe they will listen, and pull in the it departments over the weekend and rebuild their respective sites.
__________________
Quicker than two shakes of a lambs tail
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#21 |
|
I use Safari as my preferred browser, but I have Chrome set as the default so if I click any links from other applications, they open into Chrome. And if I ever need to view Flash content, I open it in Chrome. It's a simple copy-and-paste of the URL from the Safari address bar into Chrome. Simple.
---------- I still prefer Safari's "feel" over all other browsers that I use, and I use Safari, Chrome, Opera and Firefox on a near-daily basis. They all have their place. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Quote:
I also suspect that Apple have a vested interest in preventing Macs from joining the millions of Windows PCs the world over that are unknowing members of criminal botnets. Maybe a point of pride. This stream of issues isn't necessarily about these standalone apps. It is rather more focused upon applets that run within a Web browser. CrashPlan isn't (at least to my knowledge?) built as a browser applet. Even if it were to suffer technically from the same vulnerability, it might not be nearly as practical to exploit it. When Java is enabled in the Web browser, that browser becomes a potential "open window" on to the operating system for anyone able to exploit such a vulnerability. The "problem," as I see it, is applets, not Java standalone apps. Organizations that require Java to be enabled in the browser are helping to keep this issue alive since going through the browser seems an increasingly-common central attack vector. If Java simply didn't exist in the browser—if Applets were dead for good—people with apps that have Java dependencies (CyberDuck, CrashPlan, etc.) might not get locked out as often once something like this comes to light, as the level of risk, I feel, would likely be lower. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Quote:
Speaking for the three of us using Safari...thanks so much for the suggestion to join Ping.
__________________
Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. -- Albert Einstein |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Quote:
Sorry for the new be questions and thanks for any help
__________________
go #88 go
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Wait? People still use safari?
Buggiest browser I've ever used. Prefer Firefox and Chrome thanks. |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.










VAIO Z i7-QM
Linear Mode
