|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
iMac Shipping Estimates Improve to 'Within 24 Hours' in Apple's North American Online Stores
![]() Just days after experiencing a dramatic improvement in shipping times for new orders through Apple's online stores in North America, the iMac has seen its availability improve once again with stock configurations now shipping "within 24 hours". The rapid improvement in availability indicates that Apple is quickly reaching supply-demand balance for the new iMac some three months after its debut. ![]() Even in the countries such as the United States and Canada where stock configurations are being quoted nearly immediate availability, build-to-order configurations are still seeing rather lengthy build times with quotes of 7-10 business days. The disparity suggests that Apple has been prioritizing the building of stock configurations in an effort to fill distribution channels, with custom orders holding lower priority. Simple build-to-order customizations such as the addition of RAM or a different hard drive typically only add a few days to shipping estimates, so the current quoted timeframes should drop as availability continues to improve. Likewise, Apple's international online stores should also see their availability improve as increased stock filters throughout the company's distribution channels. Article Link: iMac Shipping Estimates Improve to 'Within 24 Hours' in Apple's North American Online Stores |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Good
Thats Great News
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Probably won't be in the market for a new iMac for a few more years.
They really do make my 2010 iMac look old though.
__________________
Smiley Blast! game play video http://youtu.be/N0QD4KS5Ccw Like this:http://facebook.com/smileyBlastGame Follow: http://twitter.com/smiley_blast Buy This: http://appstore.com/smileyblast |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Brazilian site - www.apple.com.br - too has the 27" model available within 24 hours, whilst the smaller one is taking 3-4 days.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
![]() At least mine can run ML smoothly still. I did upgrade the ram to 4 GB when I first bought it though. As tempted as I can by these new Macs I'll be picking up a 2nd gen Retina MBP next I think. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
They updated the Swedish store yesterday from 4-6 weeks to 1-2 weeks.
Bummer for me i have been waiting for 8 weeks now. The 21,5" is updated today to 5-7 days.
__________________
27" iMac 2012 Apple TV 2nd gen Apple TV 3rd gen White Macbook 2009 16 GB iPhone 4 8GB iPod Nano 5th gen 16 GB iPad 4 Mac mini G4 with MorphOS
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Luxury of living in the Usa/Canada
I have order my 27" with Fusion drive on 15th december , I didn't receive it yet .
I have check with the reseller today and nothing ( they blame Ireland). And by the way with all taxes the iMac cost me around $3300 so I think there you have another reason why living in the USA pays off. I am in Romania by the way. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I'm still seeing 2-3 weeks on my particular BTO configuration (3.2GHz + 2GB Video RAM + 3TB Fusion drive). When I placed my order on January 28th, I called Apple and found that the actual times were well beyond the 3 weeks estimated for this configuration. My expected ship date is March 21st.
To head off any questions or comments about my configuration or why I am willing to wait so long.... the specs meet my needs and I don't really care how long it takes because this is replacing an existing machine. Sure, I would have loved to have seen it in January. But I don't see any other way to get this as a BTO from Apple any sooner. This is encouraging news to see the lead times continue to shrink. Crossing fingers.
__________________
-David Think 8-bit.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
this post just reminded me that I have to get my HD replaced by Apple... weird
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I want to add a Magic Trackpad INSTEAD of Magic Mouse and the delay is 2-3 weeks! So it isn't even adding anything in the Mac!
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Any customizations is still 2-3 weeks (in Canada).
My 2009 is feeling dated (technically the longest I've ever owned a single PC!), plan on ordering a somewhat-deck-out new one (27", 3.4 GHz, 1 TB Fusion, 2 GB video; will do RAM aftermarket and got a NAS so don't need 3 TB, also want to Boot Camp once in a while for gaming) with tax refund, not liking the wait time though! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
now just make fusion stock please...
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I just ordered one earlier today and it said two weeks???
edit: Guess I should read. I ordered with with a wired keyboard. I guess that makes it a custom order... Last edited by spazzcat; Mar 5, 2013 at 12:19 PM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Last edited by drlove907; Mar 5, 2013 at 12:31 PM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 |
|
improved supply chain or weak demand ?
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#17 |
|
How are people supposed to complain about shipping delays now?
I guess they can complain that their iMac arrived too soon. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Quote:
. It's not like things in your country aren't easier and cheaper for you to get over people that live in the U.S.
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 |
|
You must be one of those analysts
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Not in the market for a new Mac until their all standard configurations go SSD. HDDs are so XX century!
__________________
C:\>Bad command or file name
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Quote:
Apple has done a great job on making some of the masses believe that ever-thinner is some kind of major benefit- even when to achieve that thinness, Apple must remove hardware utility and/or shift that utility to separate accessories. I suppose eventually all Apple gear will be as thin as a single sheet of paper, at which point the focus could perhaps shift to other targets that actually make newer models do more than older models (not just a little faster or via accessory attachments). Frankly, in my own case, I could almost care less how good (or thin or fat) my Mac looks as opposed to how well it helps me do what I need done. The 2010 model also still runs Snow Leopard which is a bridge back to any legacy software dependent on Rosetta while the 2013 model pretty much put legacy software out of its misery. There's pros & cons in moving on, but the leanings are entirely in the subjective: if you need something that runs on Rosetta, you need Rosetta. If an upgrade is not available, the older SL-capable Macs are THE way to go. I have a few crucial applications that require Rosetta (no upgrades available), so I appreciate being able to still use those programs. I hope that someone at Apple will eventually decide that how pretty the case looks is only important to the aesthetics crowd or the first impression "grab". It's the invisible engine inside that is much of what drives the lasting experience for Mac buyers. Sure, we want good-looking computing devices... but not to the point (IMO) where we overly sacrifice the muscle to squeeze a few more millimeters out of the shell. I want Macs that help me get more things done, not something to enter in "who has the thinnest desktop?" contests. |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 |
|
That is NOT North America. Get the facts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America |
|
|
|
1
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.










Apple TV 2nd gen
. It's not like things in your country aren't easier and cheaper for you to get over people that live in the U.S.
Linear Mode
