Would be nice for file transfers across the network though?
Does anyone here have a connection faster than 300mbps?
A lot of those things still connect to a remote IP server. Don't expect anything amazing.
Yeah, I have Gigabit fiber. Although I live in Japan.
That's beside the point though. What I want is faster LAN connectivity which is what this provides. Right now, downloading from steam I get about 4-5 megabytes (bytes not bits) per second over wireless, but plug in an ethernet cable and that immediately goes up to about 25-30MB/s. If I could cut the need for the cable, it would be great, especially for rooms in my house where there's no socket.
Once one buys a new WAP, which will be pricey at first for sure. And new computers to get the newer standard. Oh and then a few months later once a dozen neighbors are using it too, the interference will shoot it all to hell anyway.Not to mention, as Wifi ac becomes more popular. Computer to computer transfers will be amazingly fast. And dont forget if the iPhone 5S has wifi ac than syncing wirelessly will be bearable.
Yes, if you know Apples history regarding the 802.11 WLAN standards.Wow, big surprise, Apple is continuing to support advancing 802.11 standards. This is newsworthy.
:: yawn ::
Seriously? These responses are getting so tedious.Wow, big surprise, Apple is continuing to support advancing 802.11 standards.
This is newsworthy.
:: yawn ::
I'm personally looking forward to it simply because it's 100% intended for the less congested 5 GHz band. With 802.11n you're often not sure what kind of performance you're going to get, simply because of the prevalence of 2.4 GHz-configured routers (and many don't even support 802.11n on 5 GHz).Does anyone here have a connection faster than 300mbps?
Meh. Obviously they advance support for standards and technology, but are you seriously not interested in hearing when they do so? If not, what's the point of MacRumors? Only want the big news? Maybe you should look for a less niched site.Wow, big surprise, Apple is continuing to support advancing 802.11 standards.
This is newsworthy.
:: yawn ::
Although speed increase with the new 802.11ac is the feature most focused on, for me the most practical will be standardized beamforming techniques used to improve transmission over range. Vanilla 802.11n sends out signals in all directions. 802.11ac would be able direct/focus the energy towards the connected device, resulting in better signal strength and range.
I'm still running a 802.11g network, on a WiFi base station from 2001. Apple standardizing new hardware would make this an opportune time to start switching over to 802.11ac.
Cheers.
Exactly. If speculation on upcoming Apple hardware features bores them, I have to wonder what they're here for.