each generation starts with the first digit 6xxx, 7xxx ect. the second two numbers are steps up and down in that series, the lowest being x350 the highest being x990
in each x*xx there is a corresponding xx*x i.e. 6670 6770 or 6650 and 6670
As i said the first number is the generation, the second number is a sub group and the third number is a subgroup of that, the higher the number the better the card.
there it is in a nut shell.
each generation starts with the first digit 6xxx, 7xxx ect. the second two numbers are steps up and down in that series, the lowest being x350 the highest being x990
in each x*xx there is a corresponding xx*x i.e. 6670 6770 or 6650 and 6670
As i said the first number is the generation, the second number is a sub group and the third number is a subgroup of that, the higher the number the better the card.
there it is in a nut shell.
each generation starts with the first digit 6xxx, 7xxx ect. the second two numbers are steps up and down in that series, the lowest being x350 the highest being x990
Slightly on topic - do you think that Mac Pro will only have FirePro cards (they are insanely expensive) or will there be cheaper for normal cards? What do you think?
Slightly on topic - do you think that Mac Pro will only have FirePro cards (they are insanely expensive) or will there be cheaper for normal cards? What do you think?
Yes because the FirePro have
1. higher VRAM limits than the mainstream cards. The 7980 can optionally match at 6GB ( with W9000), but the W8000 and W7000 have higher upper limits. If primarily intend to push substantive computation loads to these cards more VRAM is better since they can work on larger problem subsets.
2. better driver alignment. In BootCamp Windows mode, these machines will have GPU aimed at higher end software apps that are not being ported to Macs in a supported configuration. They will also have similar drivers that are not primarily focused on games and ultra high frame rates. The FirePro drivers and optimizations are likely much closer to what the Mac drivers have been all along. It should be easier to keep those in sync.
That the Mac Pro isn't a super duper Crossfire Gamer box ....... Apple isn't going to loose any sleep over that. That is not the objective. Never has been.
Apple doesn't "hate" gaming. But not going to bend over backwards to chase gaming spec porn. Gamer spec porn is not a high growth sector of the volume that Apple needs to have viable products.
ok, but do you think I could still expect reasonable performance in games?
I hope it will be reasonably priced. I miss my 12core mac pro I had to sell few months back )))
...
At work I have workstation with Nvidia Quadro 4000 with 256CUDA cores and 2gb of ram.
Can I please ask how slow/fast is it to current lineup of the FirePro that Apple could use?
I'm asking just to get an idea as my chars are still not at full speed when hitting the play button. )
Thank you