I only use Rolex.
Nice! And yours still tells the time no better than my $100 G-Shock.
I only use Rolex.
I've said it before and ill say it again.
Apple is playing a game on this one!
Apple want to keep everyone thinking they are making a watch when really they just want to see Samsung and google waste money on a product like a smart watch that will never work.
Watches are not tech, they are jewellery plain and simple. Yes it's a massive market but even thinking about features a watch could have that a phone etc could not have, I'm left cold with the idea.
The watch is in apples remit but its the one area that is very well established as a market and tech watches always sell badly no matter how well designed or featured they are. I know the same was said about tablets but I can't help but feel its different as tablets were purely a tech market this is a jewellery market.
Anyone else thinking an iwatch would be a massive error in judgement when apple actually need to just revolutionise the TV market or go deep into developing battery tech or anything else but this.
I can't really get used to the fact that so many people out there believe what apple is to release is just "a watch".
I know most of you could not study at MIT, but still you could understand is more than a watch
iWatch... I stopped wearing a watch when my phone became smart; the idea of going back to wearing a watch is not appealing at all.
I'm still trying to wrap my mind about having a smart watch. What would I do with it that I can't all ready do?
Nice! And yours still tells the time no better than my $100 G-Shock.
You and me are very different people. I'm checking time constantly. I have a meeting at 10.... It's 9:45, good - I can do 10 minutes of work before spending 5 minutes to get prepared for the meeting, etc. etc.
I can imagine teenagers who follow Twitter 24/7 would enjoy a watch - more convenient to watch twitter feeds without the need to hold a device.
I think it will change things like football. Can a QB hold a cell-phone type device before the snap? No. He CAN glance at his watch and look at the play clock to get his snap off, or read on the watch what play the coach calls instead of spending time interpreting the signals and relaying it to all the players. Instead of the QB telling everyone what the play is, everyone glances at their watch to see what their role in the play is. Things like that.
You know the name of the site you are on?
iRadio = Music
iWatch = TV
Maybe not for a wristwatch at all???
This made me laugh so hard (bold portion). I am going to apologize proactively because my post may sound as if I am attacking but I promise I am not. No watch, by any company is going to make it into football. There's just so much "impossible" and impractical to overcome for this to even make it to the realm of possibility.
-It would have to made from darn near indestructible material. Football is a contact sport. 1st play of the game. Helmet hits watch. Watch dead.
-Looking at a watch for the play clock? The play clock is in each end zone, right above the defense. Defense is what the QB will be watching, not a watch. Looking at anything but the defense is a recipe for your 2nd string QB to become your starter.
-Play calling is not an interpretation scenario. They know the plays. That's why they practice.
-Plays are relayed from the sideline to directly to the QB's helmet.
There are many, many more reasons this is not a good idea. I applaud your creative thinking but this idea is not fully developed. The twitter feed is pretty cool though.
Nice! And yours still tells the time no better than my $100 G-Shock.
Nice! And yours still tells the time no better than my $100 G-Shock.
Watches are not tech, they are jewellery plain and simple.
I would not stereotype and denigrate everyone that wears one as a "poser," any more than I would stereotype someone who uses a Galaxy S or iDevice, a BMW, a Prius, store brand milk, or anything else.
iDontCare.
I wish Steve Jobs was still alive, he'd be able to convince me I need a watch.
Introducing the new "iWatch". PRISM, only better.