Wrong. CPUs are not fast enough.
There's simply no reason to upgrade for 2011-2012 owners.
Probably because Apple takes FOREVER to update their line, particularliy the iMacs.
These should be out every 6 months, not once a year (or more) that they've been doing.
Furthermore, the current iMacs are gimped. The baseline 21.5 should have 512MB 650M in it AT LEAST. Fusion drive should have been standard, not an extra $250! For those that need more RAM, they want another $200 for only 8 gigs!. So suddenly the baseline iMac jump from $1299 (already $100 higher than normal) to $1749. No thanks to outright gimping the system then tacking on the proper upgrades that should have been there in the first place.
iMac upgrade pricing is ridiculous, especially when they done everything in their power to stop you from upgrading yourself - in effort to get another $200+ out of you. People aren't stupid.
I waited until the refurb model I wanted showed up and saved some cash. 21.5" with fusion, 16GB RAM and a 650M. Even still, the GPU could have been better. We'll see how it does when it arrives on Thursday.
I think its because everyone is holding out for the Haswell versions of the pros
Probably because Apple takes FOREVER to update their line, particularliy the iMacs.
These should be out every 6 months, not once a year (or more) that they've been doing.
Furthermore, the current iMacs are gimped. The baseline 21.5 should have 512MB 650M in it AT LEAST. Fusion drive should have been standard, not an extra $250! For those that need more RAM, they want another $200 for only 8 gigs!. So suddenly the baseline iMac jump from $1299 (already $100 higher than normal) to $1749. No thanks to outright gimping the system then tacking on the proper upgrades that should have been there in the first place.
iMac upgrade pricing is ridiculous, especially when they done everything in their power to stop you from upgrading yourself - in effort to get another $200+ out of you. People aren't stupid.
I waited until the refurb model I wanted showed up and saved some cash. 21.5" with fusion, 16GB RAM and a 650M. Even still, the GPU could have been better. We'll see how it does when it arrives on Thursday.
I think this really is the core of the issue outside the pro laptop and desktop consumers. The pro numbers reflect the lack of updates.
I think it's simple.... Computer sales are bad across the board for the most part. Their lasting longer and it's just not needed to upgrade a computer all the time. Plus, I think many customers are moving to mobile computing which again is slowing desktop and laptop sales.
Apple needs to continue it's focus on iPhones and iPads to win and they need to give their current customers a good reason to upgrade their workstations and laptops... maybe that will come soon?
Most of the public has no idea what haswell will even do for them. Imo price is the big factor
When you have a company only concerned with making desktops thinner - and reducing functionality (removal of optical drives etc), instead of addressing other issues, it's hardly surprising!
I think so too, the rMBP is just a bridge to far.
They have a serious hole in their lineup as people are still resistant to drop the optical drive. I don't mind not having one on a laptop but many people do and the old style pro just looks ancient next to the air (no optical drive) and the rMBP (too expensive and no optical drive). The iMac never should have lost its drive as it was simply to make it APPEAR thin which was imo a very poor choice. Also the less cool that iPhones are the less people will want to buy macs and imo iPhones are appearing less cool all the time due to their stale hardware. Apple needs to take this seriously, they still make a ton of money but the slope is slippery just ask RIM
Yep, I think people feel their desktop should have an optical drive. The forced $80 for the external drive is insane. I'm sure homes use the optical drive for movies and CD rips. iMac has no business being thin.
Wrong. CPUs are not fast enough.