"it's likely he will be given free reign to work whatever hours and on whatever projects he wishes."
This is what I aspire to.
This is what I aspire to.
only problem I see is that visionary and youthfulness ofttimes come hand in hand...time
for Apple to bring in the new???
Good. Their current products are stale, no reason to upgrade type of products.
iPhone and iPad can't do all the work for too much longer.
Woz 2.0 ?
Head of the Apple Pie division I'd say
there actually used to be an Apple PIE division? Certainly here in the UK, anyway.
Back in the early-mid 90's I used to have some involvement with the PIE (Personal Interactive Electronics) team when Newton was introduced to the market.
RTP.
only problem I see is that visionary and youthfulness ofttimes come hand in hand...time
for Apple to bring in the new???
Yes, but then Mansfield had probably more to do with the design of the new Mac Pro than Schiller, thus we might say that Mansfield deserves the 'innovator' cap at least to the same degree. (Sure, we'll likely never know how much Schiller, Ive, Mansfield, or Cook contributed to that design but it's likely Mansfield played an important role.)It was Schiller that said that, not Mansfield.
Has Apple put out a press release for every addition to or removal from the SVP list?OK I don't get why Cook created this new role when he did the re-org last year. Why didn't he just say Mansfield would be working on special projects (even if internally he was still managing teams that weren't ready to transition to Riccio or Williams). It just seems odd to create a new SVP role only to get rid of it 8 months later. And then not say anything to the media until after someone questioned why Mansfield was removed from Apple's website. Very strange all around.
Looks like he is more invaluable than the Jobs himself?
Mansfield's role might be to setup and start their semiconductor business. I was thinking that all the rumors and facts surrounding Apples foray into chip design and now perhaps manufacturing will be Mansfield's role to lead. This would be a separate entity within Apple and since it's not the consumers or developers that would be this department's foremost customer, then this division might do best to not act directly under Apples's primary management structure.
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave...
The website justia.com has some of the depositions from the Apple/Samsung trial. In one deposition with a mechanical engineer he says of the industrial design team:Yes, but then Mansfield had probably more to do with the design of the new Mac Pro than Schiller, thus we might say that Mansfield deserves the 'innovator' cap at least to the same degree. (Sure, we'll likely never know how much Schiller, Ive, Mansfield, or Cook contributed to that design but it's likely Mansfield played an important role.)
I wonder if the new MacPro fell into this category at one point. I've no doubt Bob played a big role in making that product reality."there are things that they ask for that are industrial designs that I've never seen a mechanical design for, because sometimes they ask for certain things we just don't know how to do the mechanical design for."
They did when Bob retired. I think they also did when Bertrand Serlet left.Has Apple put out a press release for every addition to or removal from the SVP list?
i think he's working on the rumored apple gaming console. cant wait to see it.
OK I don't get why Cook created this new role when he did the re-org last year. Why didn't he just say Mansfield would be working on special projects (even if internally he was still managing teams that weren't ready to transition to Riccio or Williams). It just seems odd to create a new SVP role only to get rid of it 8 months later. And then not say anything to the media until after someone questioned why Mansfield was removed from Apple's website. Very strange all around.
only problem I see is that visionary and youthfulness ofttimes come hand in hand...time
for Apple to bring in the new???
It would be lovely but Apple has, for decades now, always been weak on graphics.
They basically killed off any chance they ever had to become popular as a gaming device ever and let the PC romp home due to this fact.
I would even go so far as to say, it was a major reason why they almost died off. PC's were THE games machine and people bought them in their millions to run games on, upgrading buying faster one for faster games every few years, Doom, Quake etc etc.
Apple just did what Apple does best, dig it's heels in and think it's knows better than everyone else, and it almost killed them off.
And they still have not learned even to this very day, trying to downgrade games quality to their devices, as opposed to make their computers lead the way and drive the graphics quality forwards
Putting the Wii and the disasterous Wii U to one side, Top performing Consoles and Apple just don't go together.
It's a dam shame, but they just don't want to get into this arena. Perhaps they feel they can't, and have never been able to compete?
I don't know if you realize that Apple's hobby, the Apple TV, has been outselling XBox for several quarters now? That one year of iPad sales, and half a year of iPhone sales, are about the same as _total_ XBox sales? I think you really overestimate the importance of the "gaming" market. It's easy to overestimate because the people who are in this market would be the ones most likely to post on the internet and complain loudly, but that doesn't mean there are actually that many of them, and that they have any real importance.