Take-Two CEO Says XCOM's iOS Success Shows Consumers Willing to Pay Premium Prices on Mobile

I hope more big devs see this and start producing more console type games. I would pay 20 to 30 dollars for big titles. Hats off to take two for taking a chance with their pricing model.

Yes! Mobile game developers, please keep making more premium titles and less freemium games.

Especially important now that iOS 7 is bringing gamepad support.

pipa said:

I hope more big devs see this and start producing more console type games. I would pay 20 to 30 dollars for big titles. Hats off to take two for taking a chance with their pricing model.

Click to expand...

I feel like this'll be happening more and more when iOS 7 comes out and there are MFi gamepads. Next gen iOS devices should be able to play games close to PS3/360-quality games, which will be awesome.

The question is how many more copies would they have sold at $10 or $5. As the cost of distribution is the same either way being a straight percentage. Would they have sold more than twice as many or more than four times as many respectively? It may be that they would have made more money in volume sales.

velocityg4 said:

The question is how many more copies would they have sold at $10 or $5.

Click to expand...

I've done this experiment, lowering the price of an app to see if more copies would sell. What happens is there is an initial burst of downloads for about two days. Then the number of sales drops to where I am averaging less revenue per day than at the higher price, resulting in me making almost 2X lower daily income for a price drop of 2X or more (but increasing my potential support costs because of all those additional customers). The additional number of copies sold don't make up for the lower price.

This seems to prove to me that most real buyers for my apps are willing to pay significantly more than 99 cents. So, IMHO, many iOS developers should raise their prices if they are using their app business to help feed their families and pay the rent. $19.99 seems like a perfectly good price point for a well polished and reasonably unique iOS app.

I hope companies like Nintendo are seeing this and realizing the huge market they're missing out. Some of those DS games would translate pretty well on an iPhone.

RoboWarriorSr said:

I hope companies like Nintendo are seeing this and realizing the huge market they're missing out. Some of those DS games would translate pretty well on an iPhone.

Click to expand...

That'd be nice, but the chances of Nintendo releasing any of their games on a platform besides one of their own are about slim to none. They'd probably make their own smartphone before doing that.

I hope this leads to an era of very powerful games on mobile devices.

I can't wait to see what devs end up doing with the game pad interfaces that are planned

firewood said:

I've done this experiment, lowering the price of an app to see if more copies would sell. What happens is there is an initial burst of downloads for about two days. Then the number of sales drops to where I am averaging less revenue per day than at the higher price, resulting in me making almost 2X lower daily income for a price drop of 2X or more (but increasing my potential support costs because of all those additional customers). The additional number of copies sold don't make up for the lower price.

This seems to prove to me that most real buyers for my apps are willing to pay significantly more than 99 cents. So, IMHO, many iOS developers should raise their prices if they are using their app business to help feed their families and pay the rent. $19.99 seems like a perfectly good price point for a well polished and reasonably unique iOS app.

Click to expand...

I concur with this. Infact I found increasing my price has INCREASED sales as if people see a quality product with a proper price tag and good reviews it makes more sense to them than something offering the earth for 99c (to good to be true).


The age of the 99c app/game has to end as unless you have a massive (and I mean MASSIVE) hit you don't make enough to survive.

RoboWarriorSr said:

I hope companies like Nintendo are seeing this and realizing the huge market they're missing out. Some of those DS games would translate pretty well on an iPhone.

Click to expand...

Nintendo probably don't care because... well... they're Nintendo. They never have.

Very excited to see some grade a titles to follow. Honestly I think some of gamelofts games are already pretty good but hopefully this pushes even them.

I've already got it for Shooterbox 360, but the game would be fantastic for iPad. I wish I didn't already have it so I could play it for the first time again on tablet.

I hope games can soon use Airplay as a second screen. Playing Civilization on iPad, using my 1080p screen as a larger tactical display, would be brilliant.

They've just dropped the price to $14.99. And that's my cue to buy it.

It's still a lot but I've no problems paying around 15 for an excellent game. Now if only RR3 would have ditched the iAP model and gone this way instead...

This is a great game, which I already own on PC/Mac.

I'm waiting to get the iOS version until they are clearer about the future of DLC for iOS. There's something big coming...

Great news, I too hope more devs act on this (yes, Civilsation ( a good version) please!).

That said, XCom still crashes a lot for me. I would put this down to iOS 7 beta, but a lot of people have complained about it who I doubt are all using iOS 7.

firewood said:

$19.99 seems like a perfectly good price point for a well polished and reasonably unique iOS app.

Click to expand...

While I agree with you 100%; the problem is that too many developers (mostly independents) think that their game is awesome and deserves the $19.99 price. When in reality it's just another tower defense game or something hacked together and really isn't that good. What happens then is that people don't buy it, and they turn around and make the claims that people aren't willing to pay $19.99 for a good game.

XCOM is a big name, high quality game. Well worth the price tag. But other games that are trying to establish their genre, name, style, etc, $2.99, $4.99, or $9.99 may be a better place to price the app. Generally, if it's not moving, there's a reason why.

Proof that a GOOD quality AAA title with no microtransactions can sell well, IF its well done.

X-Com, Baulders Gate, the upcoming Space Hulk, all games i will happily pay £10-£20 for on iOS

this , however, does not open up the rights to increase the price of "throwaway" games like Angry Birds to those sorts of price ranges.

Now, EA, release a version of Real Racing 3 for £19.99 with no microtransactions or enforced wait times and ill buy it !


Can we now have, Eye of the Beholder (1 , 2 and 3) , Day of the Tentacle (talkie version), Ultima Underworld 1 and 2, ZooL, Turrican, and pretty much any of the space quest series ... people will pay , !!!

CylonGlitch said:

Generally, if it's not moving, there's a reason why.

Click to expand...

Not always. Almost all app don't move. Around 99% of all paid apps are well below the top 200 of their category. But a lot more than that top 1% are useful to somebody. So there's still good money to be made in the top 5% to 10% of all those apps that "don't move". Especially if the app is priced well above 99 cents.

99 cents is only a sales tactic to get or stay in the top 200 to 500. But kicking for a well defended goal from mid-field is pretty stupid. So a better pricing strategy may well be a fairly high price to bring in more revenue per for that limited number of downloads, unless an app is already close to scoring position near the top of the rankings. A low price for a non top selling app is rarely beneficial to the developer.

For me the big issue is really the quality of the game play experience. I use steam for my game playing and while I wouldn't call my self a hard-core gamer (mostly because I'm not very good) I am definitely not a casual gamer.

There have been many games that I bought for .99, that after playing I felt like I had over paid (I know that sounds terrible, but the games were also terrible).

If I can have an experience that is comparable to my PC/Mac on an iPad, I don't see an issue with paying more for iPad apps. The problem has been that most good games utilize both hands and multiple fingers. To have the same experience using just your thumbs is a tall order.

I also am really cheap when it comes to games. Steam's summer sale spoils me so it takes a while before I can spend much on games. I spent a lot this summer but I got a ton of good games. Yeah, some were a year or two older (or more) but I hadn't played them so, who cares?

So, I'm not sure that I can pop even $14 for an iPad game. I wish I could try it out and then buy.

Renzatic said:

That'd be nice, but the chances of Nintendo releasing any of their games on a platform besides one of their own are about slim to none. They'd probably make their own smartphone before doing that.

Click to expand...

I wasn't just mentioning Nintendo, it was just one of the companies off the top of my head that haven't ventured in the smartphone department.

it's more of "forced" than "willing", these apps are the future, we have to adapt with time (and all of us love playing games, dont we?), one thing i really dislike about apple and it's partners is that they price their products way too high, about 30-40% higher than the competition. all of these companies need to think about this, stop screwing us.