I know right? Fighting against the white minority, who cracked down on the black majority for wanting things like protection under the law, voting and property ownership. How dare he.
Yes, he committed acts of terrorism, so did the American colonists.
I think the point that was being made is that these days, people who take up armed resistance against the government (like Mandela did) are labelled terrorists and are portrayed as inhuman monsters bent on senseless killing. They can end up with
even less rights than black people under Apartheid if they end up in Guantanamo or some extraordinary rendition centre.
History is written by the victors, as they say. Mandela went on from being designated a terrorist to winning the Nobel Peace Prize and US Medal of Freedom, and becoming an icon for peace and freedom all around the world.
The US Congress voted for sanctions on the Apartheid regime, but they were vetoed by Reagan because the ANC was considered a terrorist organisation at the time. What about the organisations considered terrorists today? Will the PLO one day be considered heroes against a brutal regime in the same way the ANC is today? What about ETA?
Let's take a recent news article about the ANC's past:
Forbes said:
Clearly there were those who, back in 1986, viewed the ANC as a terrorist organization. And it is true that the ANC did engage in some violent acts. However, none of the violence perpetrated by the ANC was as heinous as the violence and acts of terrorism carried out by South Africa’s apartheid government. It was, after all, President P.W. Botha who gave the order to bomb the South African Council of Churches in 1988 just as it was with the many South African government leaders preceding Botha who, for decades, killed and maimed black South Africans by the thousands, whether they be political activists or small children.
Now, let's substitute ANC = PLO, South Africa = Israel, and see if it sounds like something that we could be reading in the future. To me, it sounds remarkably plausible.
The future? said:
Clearly there were those who, back in 2008, viewed the PLO as a terrorist organization. And it is true that the PLO did engage in some violent acts. However, none of the violence perpetrated by the PLO was as heinous as the violence and acts of terrorism carried out by Israel's occupation government. It was, after all, the Israeli Defence Forces who massacred hundreds of Palestinian civilians in Lydda in 1948. For decades to follow, the IDF continued to kill and maim Palestinian civilians by the thousands, whether they be political activists or small children.
Note: We at SpringsUp enjoying interacting with the MR community. Usually, we wouldn't get involved in sensitive discussions like this, because it could offend some of our customers. However, we'd like to point out that we're not expressing support or condemnation for any particular side (PLO/IDF); we're trying to make an abstract point using a concrete example.