Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:23 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Consumer Group Calls for Recall on iPad-Equipped Newborn 'Apptivity' Seat




A consumer group is campaigning for a recall on an infant bouncy chair that comes equipped with an iPad stand, reports AllThingsD. The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC) is calling on parents and supporters to sign a petition directed at Fisher-Price Vice President David Allmark asking parent company Mattel to stop selling the Fisher-Price Newborn-to-Toddler Apptivity Seat for iPad.

The Apptivity seat, which is priced at $80, has an adjustable three-position seat designed to fit both infants and toddlers.

Quote:
If you insert and lock your iPad® into the mirror's case, the visual display provides another way to stimulate and engage baby while protecting your device from baby's sticky fingers and preventing unintentional navigating to other apps.
According to the CCFC, which backs the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation discouraging screen time for kids under age two, the iPad blocks the baby's view of the world and encourages parents to leave infants alone with iPads.
Quote:
There are so many awful screen products for babies these days, but the Fisher-Price Newborn-to-Toddler Apptivity(TM) Seat for iPad® device is the worst yet. It's a bouncy seat for an infant - with a place for an iPad directly above the baby's face, blocking his or her view of the rest of the world. And because screens can be mesmerizing and babies are strapped down and "safely" restrained, it encourages parents to leave infants all alone with an iPad. To make matters even worse, Fisher-Price is marketing the Apptivity Seat - and claiming it's educational - for newborns.
"It is wrong to create a product whose very existence suggests that it's fine to leave babies as young as newborns alone and with an iPad inches from their face," says CCFC, while urging consumers to support the petition demanding the product be removed from store shelves. Josh Golin, associate director for the group, says the toy is the "worst of the worst."

Currently, the CCFC's petition had garnered nearly 2,000 signatures. The group is hoping for a total of 3,000 signatures

Article Link: Consumer Group Calls for Recall on iPad-Equipped Newborn 'Apptivity' Seat
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:25 PM   #2
WiiDSmoker
macrumors 65816
 
WiiDSmoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hermitage, TN
Wow. Wall-e is truly becoming real.
WiiDSmoker is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:26 PM   #3
dannys1
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Nearly 2000 signatures? Thats pretty pathetic to be honest.
__________________
iMac 27" Raid0 SSD Vertex 3 MAX IOPS (240gb 1000mbps R&W) 16gb ram rMBP 2.8ghz i7 16gb ram Mac mini Server iPad mini Retina iPhone 5S Grey
dannys1 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:26 PM   #4
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 601
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiiDSmoker View Post
Wow. Wall-e is truly becoming real.
All we need now is to stick some wheels on that chair and let it grow as the baby grows.

Edit: And motorize the chairs, of course.
__________________
Battery Status - On the Mac App Store
The only app that'll estimate when your wireless devices will need their batteries changed.
Including the ones paired with other Macs on your network.
ArtOfWarfare is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:27 PM   #5
freedevil
macrumors 6502a
 
freedevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
It's not meant to left there 24/7. Over reacting much? Distract the baby for a hour or two. Even a screensaver like app would excite a baby.
__________________
An  a day keeps the dark ☁ away!
freedevil is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:27 PM   #6
Z400Racer37
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
... This thing is probably a bid extreme, but who cares what I think? or what the CCFC thinks for that matter? If people don't want it, then they won't buy it and then they'll stop making it. Simple.
Z400Racer37 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:27 PM   #7
END3R
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
I would agree with this recommendation to some extent. Yes, we don't need to plug-in our children, this will happen on its own as we all know. Parents will leave their children in front of a TV anyway so this is more of a call to parents to be more forthcoming in paying attention to your children. Not to say that this product screams that as all parents need that time to tend to other children, too, sometimes with two hands.
END3R is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:28 PM   #8
IGregory
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Please, shouldn't this be parent decision? I'd be complaining more about the price.
__________________
“The will to win, the desire to succeed, the urge to reach your full potential… these are the keys that will unlock the door to personal excellence.” ~ Confucius
IGregory is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:29 PM   #9
woogy12
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Really? What a waste of time. If its a bad product, then don't buy it. That will make the company not sell products like this.

We need an activist group to tell us this. Wow!! Stupid!
woogy12 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:30 PM   #10
OneBagTravel
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: USA
Be even more absent with your child's upbringing with the new Apptivity seat!
__________________
OneBagTravel.com will guide you through tips on traveling light. From booking hostels to train schedules, I'll help you prepare for a memorable, inexpensive, and life changing trip.
OneBagTravel is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:30 PM   #11
Albright
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Perhaps it's pedantic, but halting the selling of something is quite different from a recall. The petition is only asking for the former, but the article title implies the latter.
Albright is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:34 PM   #12
jclo
Editor
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albright View Post
Perhaps it's pedantic, but halting the selling of something is quite different from a recall. The petition is only asking for the former, but the article title implies the latter.
The text of the form letter to Allmark does ask for a recall:

"Dear Mr. Allmark,

I am writing to urge you to stop selling the Fisher-Price Newborn-to-Toddler Apptivity™ Seat for iPad® device. It’s troubling enough when companies promote screen time for babies – the American Academy of Pediatrics discourages any screen time for children under two. But this product is clearly designed to occupy infants alone and free parents up from interacting with them. Placing an iPad directly above baby’s face blocks his or her view of the rest of the world. And to make matters even worse, Fisher-Price is marketing the Apptivity Seat -- and claiming it’s educational -- for newborns.

Babies need laps, not apps. Fisher-Price should focus on developing products that actually facilitate learning and development instead of encouraging parents to strap down babies -- even those too young to sit up -- inches from a screen.

Please immediately recall the Fisher-Price Newborn-to-Toddler Apptivity™ Seat for iPad® device. "
jclo is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:36 PM   #13
thatisme
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Let the market decide.

My first thought when seeing this earlier was that there would be a recall for the iPad coming dislodged from the arm and hitting the baby in the chair.
thatisme is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:44 PM   #14
starbird
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Not sure I agree with their reasoning...

My first thought (mainly because it said recall) was that there was concern that the iPad could fall and hurt the kid. Oh well. I guess I was just not so attention seeking and pious in my views. I'll try harder next time.

Personally, I think we need to prepare our kids for the future. When they are "40"

__________________
 20" iMac Core2Duo  13" MacBook Air (2012) 
 Verizon iPhone 5 Black (32GB)  iPad (32GB Black WiFi 3rd gen)  3rd gen TV 
starbird is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:47 PM   #15
pscl
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
this is insane.
babys now see angry birds for the first time, instead of real birds in the sky. this is ridiculous.
__________________
iMac 27" late 2013, 780m / rMBP 15" late 2013, 750m
pscl is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:48 PM   #16
macduke
macrumors 68020
 
macduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
My wife is due with our first child in just a couple months and there's no way we would buy this thing. All a baby needs are some dangling, brightly colored objects to paw at. If I had to guess, it probably helps develop coordination. Staring at a screen from the time you pop out of the womb sets you up for a lifetime of sedentary behavior. I feel like too many parents babysit their kids nowadays with an iPad and/or a Netflix subscription.

When my daughter gets older she can use Macs (if they still exist, yikes) and iPads but there will be limits. I had my NES when I was little, and today I have my Xbox One and iPad—but my mom was smart enough to make me go outside and play with my friends. Our neighborhood wasn't exactly poor—maybe lower middle class at best. So with a lack of shiny new toys we got pretty creative with coming up with imaginative games to play. Later on in middle school the internet was developing, and I was able to use it to learn lots of stuff about how to do graphic design and program apps and websites, which led to my future career in app and web design. So I can see the benefits of both. I think a good balance of spare time (outside of homework and chores) will be about ⅓ on devices and ⅔ outside playing, or inside if it's cold playing with legos or reading. Though I bet a lot of the reading will be done on devices, so that might have to be adjusted.

I hope iOS continues to add new and refine existing parental controls, especially filters for Safari. Or use TouchID to set daily time limits—especially for certain app categories such as games. Their fingerprint won't work, say, after 2 hours of use until the next day. That could be overridden by the parent, of course. But could keep them from sneaking in extra device time here and there.

I'd love to hear from other (responsible) parents on how they manage the time spent on devices vs. other types of play. I feel like a lot of it will be trial and error, and it probably depends on the kid.
__________________
MacBook Pro R-Type / Quad 2.6GHz Core i7 / 2880×1800 / 16GB / 512GB SSD
Canon 7D w/grip / 24-105L / 100-400L / Sony RX100
64GB iPad Mini Retina LTE / 64GB iPhone 5 / 8GB Original iPhone / Xbox One
macduke is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:50 PM   #17
IGregory
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by starbird View Post
My first thought (mainly because it said recall) was that there was concern that the iPad could fall and hurt the kid. Oh well. I guess I was just not so attention seeking and pious in my views. I'll try harder next time.

Personally, I think we need to prepare our kids for the future. When they are "40"

Image
Now, if only they made this in my size.
__________________
“The will to win, the desire to succeed, the urge to reach your full potential… these are the keys that will unlock the door to personal excellence.” ~ Confucius
IGregory is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:52 PM   #18
JackieInCo
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Colorado
I don't see anything wrong with this. It's up to parents to decide how they want to raise the baby.
JackieInCo is online now   5 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 03:57 PM   #19
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
This screen thing would make your baby dumber by the hour. They need to see and explore the real 3D world. It literally does make then dumber, hour by hour. I fthe screen is more attractive than the world it is harmful.

TV is the same way with older kids it makes them passive rather then active problem solvers. We like being passive as it requires less work. This is why TV is so addictive. But mental effort is like physical effort it makes you stronger.

So let the baby do baby things like touch things and drop them and taste them and make noise and listen to sounds in the environment.

If you want the baby to be smarter carry him/her around with you all the time as you do normal activities. It actually works the baby is exposed to more. later as they become pre-schoolers take them 1,000 different places. no need for "educational stuff" they need a variety of experience.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackieInCo View Post
I don't see anything wrong with this. It's up to parents to decide how they want to raise the baby.
But many parents are ignorant of what's best. I would not ban these things but I'd get the word out that there is counter productive and like I wrote almost suck IQ number of to kid's brains. All passive entertainment has that effect but it is worse the younger you are.
ChrisA is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:02 PM   #20
designgeek
macrumors 65816
 
designgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: "Town"
Quote:
Originally Posted by freedevil View Post
It's not meant to left there 24/7. Over reacting much? Distract the baby for a hour or two. Even a screensaver like app would excite a baby.
The problem is that parents are likely to leave the children alone for long periods of time which is not ok. Another problem is that children have not been shown to respond to screens under the age of two so in all actuality it's quite pointless. That said, it's probably better to just not buy it, no need for an actual recall.

Here's a study about this.

http://crx.sagepub.com/content/31/3/288.short
__________________
Always, always, always question everything.

Last edited by designgeek; Dec 10, 2013 at 04:09 PM. Reason: added link to study
designgeek is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:04 PM   #21
rhett7660
macrumors 604
 
rhett7660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sunny, Southern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiiDSmoker View Post
Wow. Wall-e is truly becoming real.
That is funny you said that, this was the first thing that I thought of when I read and saw this! Poor kid is going to be blind by the time he/she is 10!
__________________
"It's quite an experience to hold the hand of someone as they move from living to dead."
"Times are looking grim these days, holding on to everything, it's hard to draw the line"
rhett7660 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:05 PM   #22
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatisme View Post
Let the market decide.
Good idea as long as you also approve sell heroin and machine guns. If it is harmful then people will see it and not buy it right? The "let the market" decide ONLY works if buyers are informed and educated.

This toy is not quite so harmful as a machine gun. Not as bad as tobacco. But it would likely cause some hard to a baby's development.

Maybe we compromise and ask them tom place a warning label on the box.

At the VERY LEAST they should be required to remove any claim that this is "educational". Not unless they have good data to back up the claim.
ChrisA is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:06 PM   #23
MigueldelRio
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Consumer groups are there to protect you from your own stupidity

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatisme View Post
Let the market decide.

My first thought when seeing this earlier was that there would be a recall for the iPad coming dislodged from the arm and hitting the baby in the chair.
I cannot believe how idiotic some of these comments are. "Let the market decide". Do you always let the market decide if a product is safe, no matter what the experts say? So if someone tries to sell a power drill that experts say will spin out of place shooting the bit through your eye, and a consumer group raises the alarm, you should shut them up and let the market decide. Right? Why not let the market decide about kiddie porn, for that matter? No, I am not going out on a limb. Just take this sentence to an extreme and you will realize how blatantly stupid it is.

The fact that society is blindly going into a world mediated by a screen is not to be taken lightly. I mean, we can joke about it as much as we like, but at some point someone must get serious about it. And the Wall•e scenario looks pretty terrible to me, even if we are talking about adults. But children? I will not explain the psychological reasons for not letting children use screens at such a young age (if you're so techie jfgi), but let us just agree that people need people to know they're people. You follow?

Hopefully, those above that so magnanimously concede their wits to the "market" (ie corporations willing to make big bucks at the expense of your children's psychological development) don't have children and have no f idea about their needs - hence their genius remarks... Hopefully. For everything else - consumer groups. They protect the braindead from their own stupidity.

Last edited by MigueldelRio; Dec 10, 2013 at 04:27 PM.
MigueldelRio is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:07 PM   #24
theBB
macrumors 68020
 
theBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albright View Post
Perhaps it's pedantic, but halting the selling of something is quite different from a recall. The petition is only asking for the former, but the article title implies the latter.
Yes, during a recall, the people who have purchased the item are asked to return them to the retailers or manufacturers in addition to the company halting sales. It may take a few more minutes of editing, but it is till better to avoid using (mildly) technical terms incorrectly. Judging by the length of the headline, author did not seem to be under that much pressure to minimize the number of words, so it cannot be that difficult to describe the campaign accurately.
theBB is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2013, 04:10 PM   #25
MigueldelRio
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackieInCo View Post
I don't see anything wrong with this. It's up to parents to decide how they want to raise the baby.
Sure. It's up to parents to give them a stupid, harmful education of they so wish. But consumer groups are there to prevent that from happening if they can. Apparently they weren't successful in some cases, and I am not replying to your comment in particular for any reason at all.
MigueldelRio is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC