Haven't done this on Southwest, but I definitely get iMessages through some of the underground wifi signals in the subway here in NYC — the networks themselves often are free but require jumping through really irritating hoops like watching videos and crap like that. I never bother to log in, but it's nice to get messages in and out.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Southwest Airlines Offering In-Flight iMessaging for $2 Per Day
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Haven't done this on Southwest, but I definitely get iMessages through some of the underground wifi signals in the subway here in NYC — the networks themselves often are free but require jumping through really irritating hoops like watching videos and crap like that. I never bother to log in, but it's nice to get messages in and out.
I'm curious how they achieve this...
iMessage uses standard secure HTTP port 443. Do they open the port then rate limit it? That would make sending photos really slow. It really seems like you could just browse anything through 443 if they have opened that port.
iMessage uses standard secure HTTP port 443. Do they open the port then rate limit it? That would make sending photos really slow. It really seems like you could just browse anything through 443 if they have opened that port.
Pretty much every airplane wi-fi service I've ever used limits access to streaming sites. Airplane wi-fi just doesn't have the bandwidth.
I'm pretty sure this revelation is a result of THIS:
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/11/21/fcc-proposes-permitting-in-flight-voicedata-cell-phone-use/
Seems likely that Southwest is fully aware that passengers will soon be allowed to use their devices during flights and are cashing in as much as they can before the FCC says it's ok.
Sad.
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/11/21/fcc-proposes-permitting-in-flight-voicedata-cell-phone-use/
Seems likely that Southwest is fully aware that passengers will soon be allowed to use their devices during flights and are cashing in as much as they can before the FCC says it's ok.
Sad.
The best part is I am on a southwest flight right now. I am a-list preferred. I get free wifi. I just iMessaged my wife and then had a 10 min FaceTime conversation with her too!!!!
Actually, this is good to know. This tells me that they aren't blocking every port, and that some good things are allowed with the WiFi access they have.
I'm thinking along the lines of LiveATC while in flight, so you could basically create your own version of United Airlines' Channel 9.
BL.
iMessage also uses port 5223.
Additionally, it has to talk to configuration.apple.com, which they could block.
The proposed use of phones during flight would NOT be to the out-of-range towers far below you. It would be to an onboard mini-cell, which the airline would charge you to access.
Nothing a VPN tunnel probably couldn't fix. Send all data over the tunnel and you're golden.
You know they have to pay for infrastructure, right?
No, no, no -- it's all about you saving SIX DOLLARS.
Let's give it up for the hacker over here, who is so clever he can save SIX WHOLE DOLLARS! Whoo hoo! SIX DOLLARS that will buy him two coffees or half a movie ticket! BUT HE'S CLEVER.
don't you still have to pay more $$$ for data access just to get the VPN to connect?
No they don't.
----------
If airlines advertise free wifi inflight, they would have more business I think in this modern world. Then other airlines would hopefully follow
It's not going to affect anyone's decision to fly...
I was kinda referring to using the $8/day Internet + VPN as a means of defeating the block on video streaming.
Let's give it up for the n00b who thinks VPN usage instantly = hacker.
Last edited:
I must be tired.
I initially read the title of this thread as Southwest Airlines Offering In-Flight Massaging for $2 Per Day.
I initially read the title of this thread as Southwest Airlines Offering In-Flight Massaging for $2 Per Day.