Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:06 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
CA Bill Requires Antitheft Technology in Smartphones




California State Senator Mark Leno is introducing a bill that would require all cellular phones sold in the state to include antitheft technology, reports The New York Times. This measure is being introduced as a way to curb smartphone thefts, which are on the rise in major metropolitan areas like San Francisco and New York City.
Quote:
"With robberies of smartphones reaching an all-time high, California cannot continue to stand by when a solution to the problem is readily available," Senator Leno said in a statement. "Today we are officially stepping in and requiring the cellphone industry to take the necessary steps to curb violent smartphone thefts and protect the safety of the very consumers they rely upon to support their businesses."
Co-sponsored by San Francisco's district attorney George Gascón, this kill switch requirement could go into effect as soon as January 1, 2015, if passed by the state legislature and signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown.

Apple likely won't be affected by the bill as it introduced its own antitheft technology with iOS 7's Activation Lock feature. This feature locks the device to the user's iCloud account and is automatically turned on when Find My iPhone is enabled. Thieves are prevented from turning off Find My iPhone, signing out of iCloud or wiping the device without supplying the original account credentials. This feature appears to meet the antitheft requirements of Leno's bill.
Quote:
Any advanced mobile communications device that is sold in California on or after January 1, 2015, shall include a technological solution that can render the essential features of the device inoperable when the device is not in the possession of the rightful owner. A technological solution may consist of software, hardware, or a combination of both software and hardware, but shall be able to withstand a hard reset. No advanced mobile communications device may be sold in California without the technological solution enabled.
Gascón and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman expressed interested in Activation Lock when it was introduced at WWDC 2013. After reviewing the technology, Gascón and Schneiderman were impressed with the feature, praising Apple for taking "an important first step towards ending the global epidemic of smartphone theft."

Cellular industry trade group CTIA will likely oppose the bill and its terms that require a $2500 fine for every phone sold without antitheft technology. The group has argued against kill switches and offered a nationwide database of stolen phones as an alternative. Law enforcement officials, however, claim the US-based blacklist is ineffective as many stolen phones are sold overseas.

Article Link: CA Bill Requires Antitheft Technology in Smartphones
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:10 PM   #2
sulpfiction
macrumors 68030
 
sulpfiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia Area
Even if devices have anti-theft technology, they are still going to be stolen. iPhone is still the most stolen phone. Even with iOS 7.
sulpfiction is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:11 PM   #3
bushido
macrumors 603
 
bushido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: España y Germany
will it come with a taser inside
bushido is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:14 PM   #4
UnfetteredMind
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by bushido View Post
will it come with a taser inside
And an armed bodyguard. Expect prices to go up, and prepare a spare room in which they can reside (one for each iOS device)
UnfetteredMind is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:15 PM   #5
Z400Racer37
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
This is a perfect example of the government jumping in front of a parade and pretending to lead it. The FREE MARKET was taking care of this problem JUST FINE. Thank goodness they were there to waste all that money though. They must really care.
Z400Racer37 is offline   21 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:17 PM   #6
Smartass
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z400Racer37 View Post
The FREE MARKET was taking care of this problem JUST FINE. Thank goodness they were there to waste all that money though. They must really care.
No they werent.
Smartass is offline   18 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:20 PM   #7
Tumbleweed666
macrumors 65832
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near London, UK.
Bring on the lawsuits about what an "advanced communication device is"......
__________________
27" late 2013 iMac, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, OSX 10.9.2
Tumbleweed666 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:20 PM   #8
The Doctor11
macrumors 68030
 
The Doctor11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: USA
If I want I sell a phone that doesn't have anti theft tech. why can't I? What if I don't want to put the time and money in to that? I hope this does not become a law
__________________
iPhone 6, iPad 3rd gen, Apple TV, Airport Express
Ebola?! Kiss your ass good bye!!!
Please subscribe to me on YouTube
The Doctor11 is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:22 PM   #9
CBJammin103
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana, United States
And if a company that has "anti theft" software built into their phones fails to locate or remotely kill a stolen device is that company now criminally liable?

Come on legislators....
__________________
iMac 27" Core i7 15" Retina Macbook Pro iPhone 5
CBJammin103 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:24 PM   #10
mhilferty108
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Still can turn off my pass code enabled iPhone without a pass code.
mhilferty108 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:27 PM   #11
herr_neumann
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco
Send a message via AIM to herr_neumann
Why address the underlying causes of crime when you can propose a politically expedient bill instead?...
herr_neumann is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:27 PM   #12
scaredpoet
macrumors 603
 
scaredpoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
I can give the benefit of the doubt to the folks who proposed this law, as being well-intentioned.

But I also can't help but think that there's some clear pandering going on here to the one smartphone vendor that is headquartered in that state, and who by the way, has this technology in place. It's very easy to require this sort of thing with little home state backlash, when your own constituents are already abiding by the proposed law.

Smartphones should have anti-theft technologies in them. Any little bit helps, or at least won't hurt. But one state doing their own thing and writing their own laws that are different from the 49 other states and the rest of the world, isn't the way to go about encouraging it.
__________________
If you're not a clairvoyant, then you shouldn't be speaking for a dead guy.
I'm here to talk about Apple stuff, and related tech stuff. Your political beliefs? I really couldn't care less about.
scaredpoet is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:34 PM   #13
charlituna
macrumors G3
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by bushido View Post
will it come with a taser inside
no joke. Because a kill switch doesn't stop the theft, it just means that the thief can't profit easily by it. But lets face it, even if I still your iPhone and you 'activation lock' it by erasing it, I can still sell it to one of those sleazy 'i fix it' shops for a few bucks so they can use the screen, the battery, the camera etc. they just can't perhaps use the storage or logic board because those would be encoded with the ID codes that the server would match to 'lock' the phone.
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )
charlituna is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:35 PM   #14
parish
macrumors 65816
 
parish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wilts., UK
Here you go, this should make them happy :-)

http://mobile.geek.com/latest/205543-darpa-asks-ibm-to-build-a-processor-that-can-self-destruct
parish is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:36 PM   #15
charlituna
macrumors G3
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z400Racer37 View Post
This is a perfect example of the government jumping in front of a parade and pretending to lead it. The FREE MARKET was taking care of this problem JUST FINE. Thank goodness they were there to waste all that money though. They must really care.
yes and no. They weren't previous to the last year or so doing anything. But yes then Apple added the whole lock thing, mainly to shut up those demanding they do something. But as I said it doesn't really stop the stealing anymore than the whole IMEI black list idea (since that is not global). Just makes gaining a profit a tad harder perhaps.
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )
charlituna is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:38 PM   #16
Flood123
macrumors 6502a
 
Flood123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Living Stateside
I don't think the proposed law goes far enough. I think they should make your phone ping the server every 15 minutes giving your exact location so just in case your phone is stolen or you lose it, a elite task force of specially trained cell phone detectives can come and find it. It would also be a great way for our government clandestine overloads to add a layer of protection for us.
__________________
Yada, yada, yada.
Flood123 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:44 PM   #17
Renzatic
macrumors 604
 
Renzatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Who puts the washers in the woods?
We should fund for more stuff like this for the private sector.

Cuz what's the point of stealing a phone if it's just gonna disintegrate on you after a couple of days?
Renzatic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:45 PM   #18
Ray Brady
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Doctor11 View Post
If I want I sell a phone that doesn't have anti theft tech. why can't I? What if I don't want to put the time and money in to that? I hope this does not become a law
The logic here is that failure to install this technology is costing the State money, therefore the State has the authority to require it. It's the same logic that allows the government to set safety standards for cars.
Ray Brady is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:46 PM   #19
subsonix
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post
no joke. Because a kill switch doesn't stop the theft, it just means that the thief can't profit easily by it.
It depends if you consider theft of personal information, you may have auto login on websites and apps with registered credit cards and so on.
subsonix is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:47 PM   #20
ThisIsNotMe
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Heaven forbid people have personal responsibility.
ThisIsNotMe is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:50 PM   #21
charlituna
macrumors G3
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsonix View Post
It depends if you consider theft of personal information, you may have auto login on websites and apps with registered credit cards and so on.
There is that as well. But a passcode stops that issue, as does a remote wipe. so how about we add to the laws that all smart phones MUST require the user to have a passcode of a minimum of 8 characters and no two side by side characters can be the same or sequential and no dictionary words from any language are allowed including common personal names, plus legally it must auto wipe the device if more than five attempts are made within a set period that use the wrong passcode. And said passcode must be required to power off the phone, turn off any form of online connection etc.

oh and lets make it a law that any device not used for over so many hours must auto wipe itself. that way if someone has a passcode and the thief leaves it setting there unused for like 24-48 hours trying to figure out password without the auto wipe kicking in from too many bad attempts, it just kills itself. Mandatory, can't be turned off by the users (sure hope they are backing it up or remember to at least pick it up and key in once a day to reset the clock or they will be screwed)

That will protect user data. But it still doesn't prevent the initial theft etc. My phone was still stolen, my carrier is still going to make me pay full price or some deductible if I was smart enough to get their insurance (which will end up costing me a fortune between that and monthly fees)
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )

Last edited by charlituna; Feb 7, 2014 at 12:57 PM.
charlituna is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:52 PM   #22
MindBen
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Salisbury.MD
Phone theft software a good idea...

I think the idea of this being mandatory in each state is a good idea, One they cannot profit from the theft of a device and second it will slow the thieves down from stealing the devices. I personally think its a great idea, Stop these young punk kids from taking advantage of people. After they get software to do this then they also need to up the laws to actually punish the the their actions with stricter laws!!!
MindBen is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:56 PM   #23
Daalseth
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z400Racer37 View Post
This is a perfect example of the government jumping in front of a parade and pretending to lead it. The FREE MARKET was taking care of this problem JUST FINE.
No, the free market was happy to sell people replacement phones.
Daalseth is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:56 PM   #24
sixrom
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by sulpfiction View Post
Even if devices have anti-theft technology, they are still going to be stolen. iPhone is still the most stolen phone. Even with iOS 7.
True, it's another opportunity for Big G to partner with Apple. They love it, and droves of faithful followers will open their wallet and buy into the ruse.
sixrom is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2014, 12:57 PM   #25
Daalseth
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Doctor11 View Post
If I want I sell a phone that doesn't have anti theft tech. why can't I? What if I don't want to put the time and money in to that? I hope this does not become a law
For the same reason you can't sell a car or aircraft without seat-belts. Because it's the law. Government sets standards and manufacturers follow them.
Daalseth is offline   4 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old smartphones Dontazemebro Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 24 Apr 9, 2014 02:43 PM
Satya Nadella Appointed Microsoft CEO as Bill Gates Shifts from Chairman to 'Technology Advisor' MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 261 Mar 14, 2014 03:42 PM
Federal Bill Would Mandate Anti-Theft 'Kill Switch' in All Smartphones MacRumors Politics, Religion, Social Issues 207 Feb 22, 2014 11:00 AM
Longtime Apple Board Member Bill Campbell Says Technology Coming to 'Intimate Objects' MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 136 Apr 22, 2013 08:35 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC