I think there's no doubt the iWatch will be using sapphire glass. Watches are far more prone to scratches than a phone since it's always out in the open and moving around.
I think they say 2nd hardest naturally occurring on earth next to diamond, all those ones you listed are synthetic things we made in a lab, right?
I've started to wonder more and more how much energy goes into the production of a single iPhone, and when I first started reading about sapphire furnaces I wondered how much energy is going into the production of sapphire.
Sapphire is NOT REPEAT NOT the "second hardest mineral after diamond".
What confuses people is that they often refer to the Mohs hardness scale, which rates hardness in relation to ten common minerals. In that list, yes, sapphire is reference mineral #9, and diamond is reference #10.
But that does not mean there's nothing in-between them.
Materials such as silicon carbide (carborundum aka the mineral moissanite), tungsten carbide, titanium carbide, boron, boron nitride, rhenium diboride, stishovite, and titanium diboride ARE HARDER THAN SAPPHIRE. That is, they are 9+ on the Mohs scale.
For that matter, there are now materials harder (10+ on the scale) than diamond .
According to Corning, it takes 100 times as much energy to produce a sapphire cover, as it does to produce Gorilla Glass.
Which is no doubt why the sapphire plant was moved from the Northeast to the Southwest, where electricity is half the cost.
I was trying to look up where Mesa AZ gets its electricity from. It seems to be either from dams or nuclear. They also have a big push to go solar there.
They are far ahead in software, not sure where you get your misinformation.
.
I wish Apple designed their products with an even longer lifespan.
I wish the Internet didn't keep making our computers NEED to be faster, when in actuality we hardly use our computers to their full potential more than once or twice a month, or year, or ever.
Obviously the power users on this site (like myself) will tell me they do a lot, which I know people do, but I just feel we really took a wrong turn somewhere in the 90s.
I'll bet shipping to China will cost almost nothing. I've been told out here on the west coast that you can fill an entire shipping container destined for China for only about $250. All the containers emptied here have to go back (full or not) so they can carry more goods from China.
Funny thing is, my first thought was (similar?) are they really going to make 100 million sapphire components and ship them all to China?
Last thing, meaningless words aside, I would assume a wearable product from Apple would be called iBand not iWatch. There's no way they would want people to think of it as only a watch.
Yeah, but the idea is to get transparent materials. Non transparency doesn't work here.
Wow. I never thought about that. Of course it is cheap to ship stuff back in that direction.
I don't think this is for the iphone. Is gorilla glass not strong enough?
(expensive) watches, however, have used saphire for decades. You're going to bump into things with a watch and so saphire makes sense here.
I'm not saying saphire iPhone displays are impossible, I just don't think they are needed.