Really, I would love to make $50,000 a day! Seriously, that's about 1.8 million if that kept up for a year.
So, really, I would think that there's something more to this story.
you mean 18 million!
Really, I would love to make $50,000 a day! Seriously, that's about 1.8 million if that kept up for a year.
So, really, I would think that there's something more to this story.
Really, I would love to make $50,000 a day! Seriously, that's about 1.8 million if that kept up for a year.
So, really, I would think that there's something more to this story.
As promised, Dong Nguyen, the developer of Flappy Bird, has removed the popular game from the App Store. Flappy Bird has been the number one downloaded free app on Apple's App Store for almost a month. The game was generating $50,000/day in revenue from in-app ads.
I wish people would learn the difference between revenue and profit.
It was part of a twitter "worst review" type thing so people piled on. At least that's the theory:
http://www.thechocolatelabapps.com/is-twitter-the-fuel-behind-the-success-of-the-1-app-flappy-bird/
it's like the amazon milk review phenomenon: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09milk.html?_r=0
people try to outdo each other.
You don't get it do you? With the media these days and their desperate attempts to have something "news worthy," He's probably being harassed non-stop about the death that the game brought.
what expenses does he have tho? besides the 30% apple share
You're asking the wrong question. The ad provider was seeing the $50k in revenue. The correct question is what expenses does the ad provider have in relation to that $50k? I'm sure they can substantiate their resulting profit margin to be in the neighborhood of 8% (whether or not its accurate) and pay Dong a cut of that.
So it's abnormal to value anything else, like peace and privacy, over the great god money.
Very interesting concept of normalcy...
It certainly is in the minority here, but putting aside that this is not exactly a random sample, being in the minority in one's values does not constitute being abnormal in any way that I know.
It's abnormal to put anything over the basic need to feed yourself.
To those without $$$, it's everything. Try bring poor and see how it is.
What a drama! I think it's a stunt to get more people to download it before it's gone from the Appstore "temporarily".
what expenses does he have tho? besides the 30% apple share
News update: The creator of Flappy Bird is so upset with so many people reporting the removal of Flappy Bird from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store that he's putting the game back up for sale."
A huge tax headache.
I'm not clear where any information about the guy said he was so penurious that he couldn't feed himself. One doesn't need more than the purported $50,000 per day earns to feed themselves.
It is not my impression that he is without money, so I'm not sure where the discussion is going. Forgive the cliché, but this is a straw man argument. We are talking about a specific person, not a general issue of whether being poor makes money important.
What exactly is your point? I'm willing to bet a poll would favor my opinion to yours.
Because the popular opinion is always the right one.
Regardless of what your opinion actually is, haven't read, don't care.
It's actually really simple. All that income is coming from one source. He would just need to pay estimated quarterly taxes. It's all stuff he could hire somebody to do for next to nothing compared with how much he's making.