Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:21 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Targeted 'CarPlay' Trademark Protection Beginning in May 2013




As part of Apple's announcement earlier today regarding the launch of its new iOS vehicle integration at the Geneva International Motor Show, the company revealed that it has rebranded the feature from "iOS in the Car" to "CarPlay".

Curious about whether Apple had previously sought to protect the CarPlay name with a trademark application, MacRumors has investigated the situation and determined that Apple appears to have registered a shell company by the name of Carplay Enterprises LLC on November 14, 2013.

Delaware corporate registration for Carplay Enterprises
The company has no obvious link to Apple aside from the fact that it is headquartered at 1209 Orange Street in Wilmington, Delaware, where other Apple-related companies have also been listed. The building is, however, essentially a mail stop that serves as the headquarters for hundreds of thousands of companies seeking to take advantage of Delaware's business-friendly laws.
Quote:
Its occupants, on paper, include giants like American Airlines, Apple, Bank of America, Berkshire Hathaway, Cargill, Coca-Cola, Ford, General Electric, Google, JPMorgan Chase, and Wal-Mart. These companies do business across the nation and around the world. Here at 1209 North Orange, they simply have a dropbox.
Less than a week after its formation, Carplay Enterprises began filing for trademarks on the "CarPlay" name, with applications in Australia, Norway, and a number of other countries coming on November 19 and the United States and several more countries following a day later. Apple's U.S. application seeks protection in three classes: Computers (including handheld devices, peripherals, and software), GPS navigation, and Computer programming.

The U.S. application lists as contact information a Gmail address and an attorney by the name of Robert Friedman who has no obvious connection to Apple, while the signatory on the application is listed as "not provided", suggesting that Apple was working quite hard to cover its tracks. Prior to the introduction of the iPad, Apple was discovered to have filed for a trademark on the name "iSlate" under a different shell company, with one giveaway being that the application was signed by an Apple employee.

U.S. trademark filing for "CarPlay"
Apple's apparent efforts to protect the CarPlay name extend back even further, however, as the November trademark applications all cite a May 20, 2013 application in Trinidad & Tobago as priority. Apple commonly uses Caribbean countries such as Trinidad & Tobago and Jamaica to establish trademark priority, taking advantage of filing systems that receive little attention and are difficult to search.

Apple introduced "iOS in the Car" at its Worldwide Developers Conference in early June, but it remains unclear whether that name was simply a placeholder with Apple intending all along to launch the feature as "CarPlay" once relevant trademark applications had been made throughout the world. Alternatively, Apple may have been considering several possibilities for the name and filed the application in Trinidad & Tobago to preserve that option before moving forward with the CarPlay name late in the year.

Article Link: Apple Targeted 'CarPlay' Trademark Protection Beginning in May 2013
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:26 AM   #2
Lepton
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
I guess it's SOP to do this for a big corporation with a big trademark. But what is the advantage? Suppose the world learned in November that "iOS in the Car" was to be branded "CarPlay"? What is the advantage in going to such lengths to hide it?
__________________
Mac OS, iOS, what else is there?
My stuff is at myallo.com
Lepton is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:28 AM   #3
Rizzn
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Sounds like something you do with your girlfriend in the backseat.
Rizzn is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:33 AM   #4
mrgraff
macrumors 6502a
 
mrgraff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Albuquerque
Somebody has been watching too much "House of Cards." This isn't one of those once-in-a-lifetime stories that every investigative journalist dreams about. I think we can dial down the sensationalism a little bit.
mrgraff is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:44 AM   #5
WildCowboy
Administrator/Editor
 
WildCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrgraff View Post
Somebody has been watching too much "House of Cards." This isn't one of those once-in-a-lifetime stories that every investigative journalist dreams about. I think we can dial down the sensationalism a little bit.
Haven't seen House of Cards.

And it's just a blog story for a reason...an interesting little tidbit, nothing more.
__________________
Editor in Chief, MacRumors
WildCowboy is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 09:56 AM   #6
i.mac
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCowboy View Post
Haven't seen House of Cards.

And it's just a blog story for a reason...an interesting little tidbit, nothing more.
Same here. TV viewing isn't universal, and macrumors is a rumor site about apple. Cannot be taken more serious than this.
i.mac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 10:24 AM   #7
mrgraff
macrumors 6502a
 
mrgraff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Albuquerque
Wow. Talk about needlessly taking things seriously. I was only making a joke about the level of detail and careful research in the story. I certainly wasn't suggesting that everyone watches the same TV shows.
mrgraff is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 10:42 AM   #8
Cuban Missles
macrumors 6502a
 
Cuban Missles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Coast, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lepton View Post
I guess it's SOP to do this for a big corporation with a big trademark. But what is the advantage? Suppose the world learned in November that "iOS in the Car" was to be branded "CarPlay"? What is the advantage in going to such lengths to hide it?
My guess is that because of all the countries and long process required to register there is a risk that if someone found out they could get ahead of apple and then register the name on their own. Later sue for money. In my imagination this is the same as domain squatting and can cost companies time and money to get it resolved. Therefore by doing this covertly, they avoid the issue and when they come out publicly, it is too late for the trolls and squatters to try and take advantage.

That is my conspiracy theory and I'm sticking to it.
__________________
I have a collection of Apple stickers from all my Apple product purchases - they are white (the stickers not the products)
Cuban Missles is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 11:37 AM   #9
anomie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Sound like a google product.
"PlayStore".
anomie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 01:37 PM   #10
JHankwitz
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to JHankwitz
I guess we now know for sure why Tim spent a day at Tesla last month.
JHankwitz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2014, 06:06 PM   #11
Solomani
macrumors 68000
 
Solomani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Was AutoPlay already taken? It would have sounded much better.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by anomie View Post
Sound like a google product.
"PlayStore".
The sounds more like a Sony product, e.g. PlayStation.
Solomani is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pioneer Talks CarPlay: Working with Apple, Pricing, and the Future MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 79 May 29, 2014 08:56 AM
Apple May Be Using 'Brightflash' Shell Company to Pursue iWatch Trademark Protection MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 50 Apr 25, 2014 08:03 AM
Here we go again... Note and S3 targeted by Apple. Wrathwitch Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices 5 Sep 1, 2012 08:25 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC