Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:49 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Neil Young to Debut 'PonoPlayer' High-Definition iPod Competitor This Week




Musician and songwriter Neil Young, who also has experience directing, has been working on a competitor to Apple's iPod for several years now, which is now close to seeing a release date.

The PonoPlayer is a $399 digital music player that is designed to offer high quality sound, beating out Apple's iPod. The sound is described as "master-quality digital music at the highest audio fidelity possible," which allows listeners to feel the true emotion and detail of the music, "the way the artist recorded it."

Young initially unveiled plans for the higher-quality digital music in 2012, after he revealed in an interview with AllThingsD that he had discussed high definition music formats with former Apple CEO Steve Jobs ahead of his death. Young has been in favor of higher definition music formats for several years, but such formats require larger files, which may have held Apple back from jumping on board.
Quote:
When asked if Young had approached Apple about the idea, Young said that he had, in fact, met with Jobs and was "working on it," but that "not much" ended up happening to the pursuit.

Of note, Young made mention that Jobs was a vinyl fan, despite having helmed the company that would spearhead the way people listened to and purchased digital music.
Apple offers iTunes music in an AAC format at a quality of 256 kbps and while the company does support a lossless audio format, the files take up more space than AAC files and are not sold on the iTunes Store.

Young's PonoPlayer works in conjunction with the yet-to-be-released PonoMusic service, which pledges to "significantly improve the way you get to hear and feel your favorite music." The PonoPlayer itself will ship with 128GB of memory, storing from 100 to 500 high resolution albums.

As for Apple's line of iPods, several of the devices, including the nano, the shuffle, and the classic, have gone more than three years without an update. Apple did introduce a minor color change for some of the devices, but it appears the company may be planning to phase out several models. The exception may be the iPod Touch, which was updated with a new design in 2012.

During a recent conference call, Tim Cook called the iPod a declining category for the company, which has been overtaken by more popular offerings such as the iPhone and the iPad. "All of us have known for some time that the iPod is a declining business," he said.

The $399 PonoPlayer will be introduced to the public via a Kickstarter project that is set to go live later this week.

Article Link: Neil Young to Debut 'PonoPlayer' High-Definition iPod Competitor This Week
MacRumors is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:50 AM   #2
Michaelgtrusa
macrumors 601
 
Michaelgtrusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere And Nowhere
Geeks will buy this.
__________________
iMACAll life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better.
TWITTER TUMBLR
Michaelgtrusa is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:50 AM   #3
Sky Blue
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
10 years too late
Sky Blue is offline   85 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:51 AM   #4
jonblatho
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Missouri
Is that a Pono in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

In all seriousness…whoever advised this business decision deserves a pink slip. Far, far, far too late to make a splash.

Last edited by jonblatho; Mar 10, 2014 at 11:57 AM.
jonblatho is offline   48 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:52 AM   #5
Z400Racer37
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
MP3 Players are dying... Even Apple says so... Epic. Fail.
Z400Racer37 is offline   31 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:53 AM   #6
MrXiro
macrumors 68020
 
MrXiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelgtrusa View Post
Geeks will buy this.
How much can even the greatest amp on earth help a lossy compression format sound better? This thing looks terrible in all aspects.
__________________
Whole lotta Apples, very little $.
MrXiro is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #7
jsw
Moderator emeritus
 
jsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Andover, MA
To me, the viability of this comes down to the DAC and whether or not it can drive higher-end headphones. If it cannot, this is an epic fail, not unlike being able to store 4K videos and then showing them on a 320x240 screen. If it can, though... I want one. Well, probably. The capacity is quite good, and if the DAC (and battery life) are adequate, this would enable audiophile music while out - in a simpler way than the current hodgepodge of equipment you need to carry. A balanced output would be great, but... this could still be worthwhile.

Edited to add: yes, the file formats matter, but it's also true that the digital-to-audio converters and amps in smartphones are getting better but are still somewhat lacking, so if this does in fact provide a much better DAC and amp, then it will absolutely be worth $400 to people who want the highest possible quality while out... although likely few others would notice or care about anything beyond the high price and odd shape.
__________________
You'll be the one moaning for me to give you some. - THC(taken out of context)
jsw is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #8
Razeus
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Someone tell Neil that these devices aren't in anymore. It's about streaming music these days. What? I'm suppose to carry an iPhone (an object already built into my lifestyle) and this? And for $400?
__________________
Pictures & Tweets
Razeus is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #9
Solomani
macrumors 65816
 
Solomani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Not really interested investing myself in yet another music ecosystem. But I welcome this news for only one thing: it might just give Apple a kick in the pants to start upping its game for iPod/iTunes (instead of resting on its laurels).
Solomani is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #10
jakebot
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Are you sure this news story didn't get lost in a queue from 8 years ago and then accidentally get posted to the site today?
__________________
jakebot is offline   35 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #11
commander.data
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
I wonder if they plan on including high quality earphones with their high quality music player? I guess most people would use their own, but packing in cheap ones sends the wrong impression.
commander.data is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #12
carjakester
macrumors 68000
 
carjakester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Lagrange Park, Illinois
great now too bad i have this thing called an iPhone and doesn't look like a toblerone bar
__________________
Late 2013 rMBP iPad 4 Retina Ipad Mini Iphone 5s Apple TV 3
carjakester is offline   56 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:54 AM   #13
johncarync
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Fail

Too expensive, too big, too late.

Oh...and kids today don't care that much about quality. They're happy watching a crappy video with crappy sound quality on YouTube. And they're happy with using the cheap earbuds that come with whatever device they buy.

And I'll be the first to ask...Does it come in Zune brown?
johncarync is offline   22 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:55 AM   #14
Nickerbocker
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
The casing, design, and overall presentation does not scream "high quality". Maybe in the same way those crappy Cowon players did....uhg, I still regret that Cowon D2 I purchased based on "audiophile" recommendations. What a steaming pile of crap that thing was.

Learned my lesson. I'm obviously not an audiophile or care to spend my hard earned cash on this overpriced crap.
Nickerbocker is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:55 AM   #15
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
I only have one question - Why??
I think he's like 10 years too late
__________________
~Mike Flynn
maflynn is online now   7 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:57 AM   #16
SJism23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
I hope Apple sees this and considers making an iPod Classic Pro with better sound chip. Also: lossless music on the iTunes Store.
SJism23 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:57 AM   #17
tshrimp
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Admittedly it will probably have better sound than the iPod as Apple has never been the choice for audiophiles, but that case design and assumed worse interface and crazy price = no way.
__________________
Christianity: In the beginning there was an ultimate being. Which created everything.
Atheism: In the beginning there was nothing. Which exploded.
tshrimp is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:57 AM   #18
Chupa Chupa
macrumors G3
 
Chupa Chupa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
No use for the player but I welcome a digital music service that sells decent bit rate lossless albums; essentially CDs w/o the CD.
__________________
Walled Garden ≠ Prison:
"People who use Apple products considered their options, and chose Apple. If they regret their decision, they can dump it at any time." -- Harry McCracken, Technologizer.com
Chupa Chupa is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:58 AM   #19
Meicyn
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Flop product will flop.
Meicyn is online now   10 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 11:59 AM   #20
Cole Carrera
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Foxconn?
__________________
ccarrera.tk
Cole Carrera is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 12:01 PM   #21
n-evo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Amsterdam, NL
$400 for an iPod classic-like player. Year 2004 is that you?

Last edited by n-evo; Mar 10, 2014 at 04:45 PM.
n-evo is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 12:01 PM   #22
Codyak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
I think this guy turned the clock too far back yesterday.
Codyak is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 12:02 PM   #23
McTaste
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chupa Chupa View Post
No use for the player but I welcome a digital music service that sells decent bit rate lossless albums; essentially CDs w/o the CD.
I absolutely agree. A triangular media player doesn't fit in anyone's pocket (and what's up with tha apparent lack of balanced output?), but I would love a store that sells high bit- and sample rate FLACs or other file formats. HDTracks is good but the selection is limited...think of what they could do if they had all the major labels allowing HQ rips of EVERYTHING.

Which, admittedly, may be a pipe dream.
McTaste is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 12:02 PM   #24
MacVista
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
He could have pitched it to iTunes for it to offer a high-resolution premium version of music downloads and champion an update to the iPod Classic.
Otherwise, I don't think there is a market for a 'portable' audiophile product.

Last edited by MacVista; Mar 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM.
MacVista is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2014, 12:03 PM   #25
iVoid
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Um... yeah, that shape will make it easy to carry in a pocket... not.
iVoid is offline   7 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amazon's Apple TV Competitor Expected to Debut at April 2 Media Event MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 56 Apr 2, 2014 04:40 PM
Facebook Appears Set to Debut iPhone Competitor Built on Android on April 4 MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 232 Apr 3, 2013 01:18 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC