Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

switcher3365

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 5, 2008
164
17
I have a Netgear WGR614 router (http://amzn.com/B00008SCFL). I can't remember when I bought it, though I know it is at least 4 years old. It's been on the market since October 2007.

Anyway, I upgraded to 30mbps cable internet, and realized that the reason I could never break 20mbps was because of the router. When I hook directly up to the cable modem, I'm fine.

Does a router's age impact performance significantly? Is there a cycle as to how long one should keep a router?

Thanks
 

velocityg4

macrumors 604
Dec 19, 2004
7,329
4,717
Georgia
There's no set age. When it's not fast enough for your needs, keeps failing or some other deficiency it is time to replace it. In your case it seems it is time.
 

Asuriyan

macrumors 6502a
Feb 4, 2013
622
23
Indiana
That's a 802.11G router that supports a maximum of 54MBPS. The best Wireless-N routers are rated for up to 450MBPS and the newest 802.11AC routers support up to twice that.

WiFi has come a long way since 2007, and that Netgear was a budget router even then. I typically replace mine once every two to three years, or every other generation of AirPort Extreme.

There are other factors to consider- including the fact that a router contains a basic CPU and its performance as a router is tied to its computing ability.

It's definitely time to upgrade. ASUS and Apple make the best options on the market, assuming you don't mind shelling out $150-200 for a router that should last you several trouble-free years.
 

switcher3365

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 5, 2008
164
17
If it's worth mentioning, I do live in an apartment, so there's lots of networks shooting out signals nearby. Could that play a role as well?
 

paulrbeers

macrumors 68040
Dec 17, 2009
3,963
123
If it's worth mentioning, I do live in an apartment, so there's lots of networks shooting out signals nearby. Could that play a role as well?

Some degree you could be experiencing interference; however, due to packet over head, encryption, and packet loss it is well known that you generally only end up with about half the maximum bandwidth. Therefore only getting 20mbps is about right if you have a g router.
 

Altemose

macrumors G3
Mar 26, 2013
9,189
487
Elkton, Maryland
If it's worth mentioning, I do live in an apartment, so there's lots of networks shooting out signals nearby. Could that play a role as well?

If you purchase a dual band N or AC speed router, then you will see an improvement. The 2.4 GHz spectrum is overcrowded with portable home telephones, microwaves, certain radio waves, and other wireless networks. The 5 GHz signal degrades a lot easier through walls and other obstructions, but is alot cleaner and more open.

I recommend a router like an AirPort Express or an Extreme if you want the additional features. Coupled with drop dead easy configuration, general reliability, and dual band wireless-n you should see a great increase.
 

mneblett

macrumors 6502
Jun 7, 2008
369
0
If you are going to upgrade, you may want to consider spending a bit more and getting an 802.11ac router. Of course, if money's tight go .11n for now -- .11n will handle your ISP's current 30Mbps service.

ac is the "next gen" wifi standard. You may not have any ac devices now, but over the next 3-4 years you likely will.

If you think you may want the 3x speed of .11ac (with 3x3 devices) to pass information across your network (for things like transfers between computers or backups to devices on your home network -- ac it won't speed up your internet access), you'll have to replace an .11n router, i.e., you'll end up buying two routers (.11n now and .11ac later) instead of one .11ac router now that should hold you for the next few years.
 

satcomer

Suspended
Feb 19, 2008
9,115
1,973
The Finger Lakes Region
If it's worth mentioning, I do live in an apartment, so there's lots of networks shooting out signals nearby. Could that play a role as well?

Then on a Mac use the free program iStumbler Beta to figure out what channel your neighbors routers are broadcasting and change you channel to use the offset channel for less interference.

Plus trust me that other poster are correct about getting a dual-band router. Most of them will heave a USB2 port to share a USB2 drive/printer across the network.
 

switcher3365

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 5, 2008
164
17
Thank you all for your help. I think I am going to go ahead with a dual-band n router for now.
 

switcher3365

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 5, 2008
164
17
So, I actually went with an AC router since I'll be replacing my computer this year. NewEgg had a $99 deal ($179 regular) on a Netgear R6250 Wireless AC1600 router. It has great reviews. I'm getting a little over the 30mpbs I'm paying for now on both bands. Awesome! Thanks for the tips.
 

brentsg

macrumors 68040
Oct 15, 2008
3,578
936
Anything I owned that's sub "N" has been recycled. I'd like to spring for AC, but only for streaming uncompressed Blu-ray rips.

I haven't given that a close look just yet, but my existing N network handles most of them (but not all) well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.