Apple's listed "maximum" isn't an actual technical limitation. It's just that Apple doesn't want to get sued if anything goes wrong with a configuration they haven't tested. They've been burned before suggesting that larger RAM capacity is possible than what they've tested, though that was a long, long time ago.
I'm sure we'll see 128 GB at full clock speeds before too long. Obviously somebody just has to make the chips dense enough. Only four RAM slots is a bit disappointing, but that's the cost of having such a tiny box. Why did Apple make such a tiny box again?
I'm sure we'll see 128 GB at full clock speeds before too long. Obviously somebody just has to make the chips dense enough. Only four RAM slots is a bit disappointing, but that's the cost of having such a tiny box. Why did Apple make such a tiny box again?