Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 8, 2014, 09:54 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Narrows Gap in U.S. Advertising Spending With Rival Samsung




Samsung is the leader in mobile advertising, significantly outspending all its rivals on commercials that target the U.S. market. Though still number one, the Korean company's advertising dollar lead is shrinking, reports the Wall Street Journal, with Samsung's rivals increasing their advertising spending by 33 percent year over year in 2013.

According to ad research company Kantar Media, the top seven U.S. smartphone makers spent over $1.3 billion in 2013 on advertisements for print, TV online, radio and outdoor venues. Apple spent $351 million last year, with the bulk of that money ($339 million) going toward TV ads.

While Apple increased its spending 5 percent year over year on mobile phone ads, Samsung scaled back its advertising efforts, reducing its U.S. advertising by 10 percent in 2013 to $363 million. The gap between Samsung and Apple now has narrowed to $12 million, which is less than the $68 million gap in 2012.


Samsung is known for its aggressive Galaxy marketing campaigns, which routinely target rival devices. Samsung's clever tagline "The next big thing" reportedly infuriated Apple executives and lead to a tense email exchange between Apple's head of marketing Phil Schiller and the company's longtime ad agency, TBWA/Media Arts Lab.

Despite outspending Apple in advertising dollars, Samsung trails Apple in U.S. smartphone subscribers, with 26.7 percent market share as compared to Apple's 41.6 percent. Apple's market share continues to grow, but the overall rate of adoption is slowing as the smartphone market approaches saturation.

Article Link: Apple Narrows Gap in U.S. Advertising Spending With Rival Samsung
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 09:57 AM   #2
JayCee842
macrumors 6502a
 
JayCee842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
This is not a surprise. People bash me when I say the success of Samsung's Galaxy line is an affect of their drastic marketing.
JayCee842 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 09:58 AM   #3
keterboy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Earth's Core
Joke of the day
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0793.PNG
Views:	156
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	467781  
keterboy is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 09:59 AM   #4
Nebrie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Now work on international advertising. Outside of the tier 1 countries, Apple advertising is almost non-existent while Samsung is everywhere.
Nebrie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:00 AM   #5
bbeagle
macrumors 65816
 
bbeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCee842 View Post
This is not a surprise. People bash me when I say the success of Samsung's Galaxy line is an affect of their drastic marketing.
Instead of ignoring Samsung, Apple needs to combat them.

In a nice, funny, way though.

Hello, I'm an iPhone. Hello, I'm a Samsung Galaxy.
bbeagle is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:01 AM   #6
MartinAppleGuy
macrumors 65816
 
MartinAppleGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbeagle View Post
Instead of ignoring Samsung, Apple needs to combat them.

In a nice, funny, way though.

Hello, I'm an iPhone. Hello, I'm a Samsung Galaxy.
You got it
__________________
2014 Highest End 21.5" iMac, 2.9 - 3.6Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, Nvidia GeForce GT 750m w/ 1GB GDDR5 VRAM
MartinAppleGuy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:04 AM   #7
MarkMS
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Apple might be narrowing the gap in phone advertising, but Samsung still spends a boatload overall.
MarkMS is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:05 AM   #8
realeric
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: United States
I was told Samsung have been spending money on task force teams for reviews or comments.
realeric is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:06 AM   #9
Xerotech
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkMS View Post
Apple might be narrowing the gap in phone advertising, but Samsung still spends a boatload overall.
If this is advertising budget in general, Samsung has many different products.
Xerotech is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:12 AM   #10
tasset
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkMS View Post
Apple might be narrowing the gap in phone advertising, but Samsung still spends a boatload overall.
Image
Thanks for posting this chart, I was about to go search for it. Narrowing the gap on TV/radio marketing may be happening but I guarantee you Apple is not giving store flunkies and operators the same kickbacks/spiffs to push their products that Samsung is which makes up a chunk of their budget.
tasset is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:14 AM   #11
bbeagle
macrumors 65816
 
bbeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebrie View Post
Now work on international advertising. Outside of the tier 1 countries, Apple advertising is almost non-existent while Samsung is everywhere.
Might be a reason why Apple's profits are so much higher. Apple doesn't pay the $3 billion additional that Samsung pays for advertising.
bbeagle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:15 AM   #12
Rad99004
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCee842 View Post
This is not a surprise. People bash me when I say the success of Samsung's Galaxy line is an affect of their drastic marketing.
I say yes and no.

Apple needs to concentrate on their feature lists.

At this point Samsung is so far ahead.

I like Apple for its ease of use. This is great but that yesterdays feature.

OS wise Microsoft is even ahead. I can't count how many times I try swiping down from the top of the screen to close an app. I like having two apps open on the screen at the same time.

Apple just catch up, pass them up and do what you do.
Rad99004 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:17 AM   #13
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasset View Post
Thanks for posting this chart, I was about to go search for it. Narrowing the gap on TV/radio marketing may be happening but I guarantee you Apple is not giving store flunkies and operators the same kickbacks/spiffs to push their products that Samsung is which makes up a chunk of their budget.
No - different model. Instead of offering incentives - Apple contracts the carriers to sell a guaranteed amount or the carrier eats the cost. And the margins on their phones are slim.

So I wouldn't want to be a carrier store manager. On one side you have great profits you can make with Android OEM incentives (and your employees make money) on the flip side, you have to make sure you're hitting your Apple iPhone numbers or you're costing corporate money.
samcraig is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:23 AM   #14
andrew0122
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Springfieldvilletownvilleton, Missouri
. . . But is this the line for apps??
__________________
AL iMac 24" 2.8 Extreme C2D, 750GB HD, 6GB RAM
Boxee Box
Nexus 4
andrew0122 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:25 AM   #15
tasset
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
No - different model. Instead of offering incentives - Apple contracts the carriers to sell a guaranteed amount or the carrier eats the cost. And the margins on their phones are slim.

So I wouldn't want to be a carrier store manager. On one side you have great profits you can make with Android OEM incentives (and your employees make money) on the flip side, you have to make sure you're hitting your Apple iPhone numbers or you're costing corporate money.
Therein lies the problem- the carriers exist (or 'should' exist) to sell mobile service. End of story. They should be nothing but a passthrough for device sales and only be incentivized to direct customers to the device that best fits their need and sells their service. Perhaps this is the way things are heading now with no contract plans in the US and device costs are broken out from service.
But when you have OEMs profit sharing with retail employees, their managers, and carrier HQ, their motivations change from satisfying the customer to their own interests in the short term. I get that is the way the sales game is played, I just long for a day when it is not.
tasset is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:27 AM   #16
wigby
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rad99004 View Post
I say yes and no.

Apple needs to concentrate on their feature lists.

At this point Samsung is so far ahead.

I like Apple for its ease of use. This is great but that yesterdays feature.

OS wise Microsoft is even ahead. I can't count how many times I try swiping down from the top of the screen to close an app. I like having two apps open on the screen at the same time.

Apple just catch up, pass them up and do what you do.
Sorry but you kind of sound like a marketing douche. Ease of use is "yesterdays feature"?

Ease of use will always be the number 1 feature for the general consumer of electronics and software.

Why are you trying to close an app by swiping down? Not sure I understand your problem.

So instead of complaining about the iPhone's 4" screen being too small, you want two apps open on it at the same time???
wigby is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:28 AM   #17
brendu
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
I must not watch the right shows. I see a ton of Samsung commercials but very rarely see apple commercials. Really I only see apple ads when watching live sports. I hope this money is worth it. Apples advertising isn't all that great anymore. I have seen teenagers who made better mockup ads than these million dollar ad agencies
brendu is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:28 AM   #18
Popeye206
macrumors 68030
 
Popeye206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NE PA USA
Apples best advertising has been word of mouth… one you can't buy. So, for Apple to get it's "mojo" back, they need to make the iPhone 6 not just meet the other larger phones, but beat them in some cool or innovative way.

Honestly, I don't think this would be hard for them to do… all the phones seem to have reached a peak in features. Quality, performance and ease of use is where Apple can really shine.
Popeye206 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:28 AM   #19
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasset View Post
Therein lies the problem- the carriers exist (or 'should' exist) to sell mobile service. End of story. They should be nothing but a passthrough for device sales and only be incentivized to direct customers to the device that best fits their need and sells their service. Perhaps this is the way things are heading now with no contract plans in the US and device costs are broken out from service.
But when you have OEMs profit sharing with retail employees, their managers, and carrier HQ, their motivations change from satisfying the customer to their own interests in the short term. I get that is the way the sales game is played, I just long for a day when it is not.
I agree. But if there are no incentives, there should also not be contracts with OEMs to sell a specific amount either. The problem with that is - that affects manufacturing because no one wants to have a short supply, nor does anyone want to massively over-produce...
samcraig is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:29 AM   #20
wigby
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasset View Post
Therein lies the problem- the carriers exist (or 'should' exist) to sell mobile service. End of story. They should be nothing but a passthrough for device sales and only be incentivized to direct customers to the device that best fits their need and sells their service. Perhaps this is the way things are heading now with no contract plans in the US and device costs are broken out from service.
Now try telling that to cable companies too. Seriously, do you blame them? No one wants to be just another data pipe.
wigby is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:30 AM   #21
reden
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
I have always been an iPhone user. I decided to go into the android world unbiassed by switching over to the HTC One first, then the S4. Both are good phones, but their downfalls is Android, and the User Experience that both companies implemented with their customer interfaces. NFC is useless, all the eye stuff for the S4 are just gimmicks. Both phones can get annoying to use. The only thing I miss from both phones are the Bigger screens, and the swipe to text features. Other than that, I don't see why Samsung likes to bash Apple when their Galaxies are full of flaws that far surpass the iPhones. The build quality of the HTC is an illusion as well. It's a beautiful phone, but some of the plastic parts are just pathetic quality, even dye from your jean pockets will get stuck to it, and it will be hard to take off. I had the silver HTC One with white trim, and wore some red cargo shorts I had once, had it in my pocket, it turned into an silver HTC one with a pink trim.

Last edited by reden; Apr 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM.
reden is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:34 AM   #22
tasset
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
I agree. But if there are no incentives, there should also not be contracts with OEMs to sell a specific amount either. The problem with that is - that affects manufacturing because no one wants to have a short supply, nor does anyone want to massively over-produce...
I will concede Apple's minimum order demands is both ruthless and even a bit self protectionist. The product can and should stand on its own. However they are dealing with phone companies who would like to have the iPhone to not be at a competitive disadvantage but then in turn try to sell as absolutely few of them as possible were it not for this guaranteed order amount.
tasset is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:34 AM   #23
H2SO4
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerotech View Post
If this is advertising budget in general, Samsung has many different products.
THIS, This!
__________________
MP1,1. 30"ACD. 11GB
H2SO4 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:37 AM   #24
tasset
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by wigby View Post
Now try telling that to cable companies too. Seriously, do you blame them? No one wants to be just another data pipe.
I agree. But who blames them? I DO. As should everyone else This topic would diverge into something else, so I'll briefly say that America's broadband infrastructure will slink further and further behind the rest of the world until it's realized en masse that "just another data pipe" is in the country's best interest.
tasset is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 10:37 AM   #25
bbeagle
macrumors 65816
 
bbeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by reden View Post
The only thing I miss from both phones are the Bigger screens, and the swipe to text features. Other than that, I don't see why Samsung likes to bash Apple when their Galaxies are full of flaws that far surpass the iPhones.
True.

The SIZE of the phone is the main feature that makes the purchasing decision of an Android over an iPhone - not what the phone can do.

Galaxies are full of flaws, but you can't count on the media to report it. Apple needs to step to the plate and ADVERTISE the flaws.
bbeagle is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tim Cook: Apple 'Spending an Enormous Amount' on 'Macs of the Future' MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 212 Apr 23, 2014 11:04 AM
Second Apple-Samsung Patent Trial Begins with Focus on Apple's 'Holy War', Advertising Envy, and Phil Schiller MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 90 Apr 9, 2014 10:31 PM
'Think Different' Campaign Creator Suggests Apple Needs to Step up its Advertising Game to Counter Samsung MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 318 Mar 13, 2013 10:37 AM
BBC News: Apple's iPhone launches no longer excite. Apple now spending only 2% on R&D iPad 2 iPhone 1 Sep 12, 2012 09:24 AM
Apple Reportedly Interested in Acquiring 'The Fancy', a Pinterest Rival MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 81 Aug 7, 2012 09:47 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC