Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:14 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iWatch to Come in Two Sizes With 'Fashionable Appearance', Top End to Cost 'Several Thousand' Dollars




In a 2014 product roadmap that outlines all of Apple's plans for the year, KGI Securities analyst Ming Chi Kuo revealed his predictions for Apple's much-rumored iWatch, which may ship as soon as the third quarter of 2014.

According to Kuo, the iWatch will come in two separate sizes to accommodate different sized wrists: 1.3 inches and 1.5 inches. Multiple sizes for the device were first predicted in late 2013, though the original rumor pointed towards displays of 1.3 and 1.7 inches. Both watches will include flexible AMOLED displays with sapphire covers to protect the device from scratches.

Along with a multitude of biometric sensors, coupled in a system-in-a-package design, Kuo predicts the iWatch will include integration with the iPhone, iPad, and Mac, along with a "fashionable appearance," an NFC chip, and a slim and light design.

Traditional watch-style iWatch concept based on TRIWA's Havana Nevil Brown watch, by Gábor Balogh
Quote:
We are confident on Apple's ability to make wearable devices with good fashion sense, which sets Apple apart from rivals.
Kuo believes many of the iWatch's mechanical parts may be constructed using liquid metal and that it may include an "innovative" antenna design that allows for wireless charging functionality.

Battery life has been a major challenge for Apple when it comes to iWatch development and Kuo forecasts a 200 to 250mAh battery for the device that will provide at least a one day of operating power. Earlier reports have suggested the company is aiming for three to four days of battery life, however, and Kuo does note that the battery will be longer than "most wearable devices" due to the company's "vertically integrated operating system and key components."

Kuo suggests Apple will release the iWatch at multiple price points and in a variety of materials, competing with low and high-end watches alike. At the high end, Kuo suggests Apple's iWatch could sell for thousands of dollars.
Quote:
Fashion is the name of the game; most expensive model likely priced at several thousand US dollars. Referring to the rules of the fashion market, we predict the iWatch casing and band will come in various materials. The most expensive model of the iWatch line will carry a price tag of several thousand US dollars.
Apple's iWatch is not expected until the end of the year, but Kuo believes it will be the most important product of 2014, outshining even the iPhone 6. He is estimating shipments of 5.5 million units in 2014, which will rise to 30 to 50 million units in 2015.

Article Link: iWatch to Come in Two Sizes With 'Fashionable Appearance', Top End to Cost 'Several Thousand' Dollars
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:15 PM   #2
SJism23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
A top-end iWatch at several thousands of dollars? No chance in hell.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro (early 2011), 2.0 GHz i7, 16GB RAM; iPad 4, 32 GB; iPhone 6 Plus, 128GB
SJism23 is offline   128 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:15 PM   #3
jonyive4
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
aaaaaand my shares in liquid metal are going to go up tomorrow. yay.
jonyive4 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:15 PM   #4
iBlazed
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Home of Gov. Chris Crispy
When we look back at these mockups after the real product is out, we will laugh the same way as we do now when looking at iPhone mockups before the original came out.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	iphone-mockup.jpg
Views:	1226
Size:	28.8 KB
ID:	467980  
iBlazed is offline   89 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:16 PM   #5
Orlandoech
macrumors 68040
 
Orlandoech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Lol.... So no one will buy the top end model besides maybe ridiculous fans and Oprah?
Orlandoech is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:16 PM   #6
NachoGrande
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Several thousand for a watch that will be obsolete in two years, sure

No thanks...
__________________
27" iMac(2010) // 13" MBA (2011) // iPad // iPad 2 // iPad 3 // iPhone 5&6 // ATV2
NachoGrande is offline   59 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:18 PM   #7
penajmz
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York City
Wait.... Several thousand?

Nope.
penajmz is online now   23 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:18 PM   #8
luckydcxx
macrumors 6502a
 
luckydcxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
I'll get one
__________________
Write the code. Change the world.

http://youtu.be/eywi0h_Y5_U
luckydcxx is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:18 PM   #9
Applefan 2013
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Too close to all the politicians in DC
Several THOUSAND dollars for the top-of-the-line iWatch? Even though this is Apple, would people ACTUALLY pay that?
__________________
 MacBook Pro 13" Mid-2012, 16GB RAM/512GB Crucial MX100
 iPhone 5C, 32GB, Blue, Verizon
🇺🇸 'Merica
Applefan 2013 is offline   21 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:19 PM   #10
Icaras
macrumors 601
 
Icaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California, United States
There is no way ever that a wearable device is going to cost more than a Mac with a display.
Icaras is offline   34 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:19 PM   #11
jonyive4
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachoGrande View Post
Several thousand for a watch that will be obsolete in two years, sure

No thanks...
first gen iPhone new in box is worth several thousands of dollars today. this is probably the last product that steve worked on too.
jonyive4 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:19 PM   #12
poppe
macrumors 68020
 
poppe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Woodland Hills
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachoGrande View Post
Several thousand for a watch that will be obsolete in two years, sure

No thanks...
I think an expensive watch that can be upgraded is great - Say an expensive band and then a normal priced face. The reason I bring this up is because I think there is a good amount of people still that have expensive watches and while they want a smart watch, they do not want some pebble looking $200 watch.
__________________
In Stereo
where supported
poppe is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:20 PM   #13
Foss
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
LOL @ several thousand dollars. With all the rumored bells and whistles, the obvious price point is about $300 - $500. Why would they put NFC in the watch but not any of their other devices? That and the several thousand remark shows how much common sense analysts have compared to your average techie...
Foss is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:20 PM   #14
rorschach
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Several thousand dollars?

Reminds me of all those reports that were sure the iPad wouldn't go for under $999.
__________________
MacBook Air 13-inch (Mid 2012), iPhone 6
rorschach is offline   34 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:21 PM   #15
bmt134
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJism23 View Post
A top-end iWatch at several thousands of dollars? No chance in hell.
For sure, tech is upgraded every year (even more than once at times). So who wants an outdated watch of several thousands of dollars? No way it can compete with timeless classics like the Omega Speedmaster, Rolex Submariner, etc.
bmt134 is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:22 PM   #16
3bs
macrumors 603
 
3bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icaras View Post
There is no way ever that a wearable device is going to cost more than a Mac with a display.
That's probably the best way I've seen someone put it.

Unless it's made by some huge brand like Rolex or something.. but that wouldn't appeal to the masses (or maybe it would if they could afford it).
3bs is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:23 PM   #17
AceMason
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Definitely not going to be "several thousands of US dollars".
AceMason is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:24 PM   #18
dannyyankou
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Actually wouldn't surprise me if they had a low end model for a couple hundred bucks, and if they partnered with a company like Rolex for the high end model.
dannyyankou is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:24 PM   #19
afsnyder
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Yea, I don't believe this lol.
__________________
Owner of a Retina Macbook Pro (late-2013) and an iPhone 5
afsnyder is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:25 PM   #20
kds786
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
I'll stick with Bulova, Movado, Rolex, and Tag Heuer. The iWatch just doesn't appeal to me.
kds786 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:26 PM   #21
Frankied22
macrumors 65816
 
Frankied22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
I would not pay more than $100 for the iwatch. Nothing it could potentially do warrants more money than that. It's just an accessory.
__________________
iPhone 5S 64GB Silver 2012 13" MBA i7/8/256
Frankied22 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:26 PM   #22
sfwalter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
I bought into this rumor until I heard "most expensive model likely priced at several thousand US dollars."
sfwalter is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:27 PM   #23
Bodygard
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
I stopped reading at several thousands...-.-
Bodygard is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:27 PM   #24
kdarling
macrumors Demi-God
 
kdarling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Device engineer 30+ yrs, touchscreens 23+.
Reminds me of the "I'm Smartwatch" from Italy.

It comes in $350 plastic versions, $900 titanium, and gold versions starting from $2,000 up to $20,000 for a jewel encrusted version.

I wonder how many they've sold of the higher end models.

Name:  im_watch.PNG
Views: 8274
Size:  95.1 KB
kdarling is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 08:28 PM   #25
rp2011
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
"Flexible AMOLED displays with sapphire covers to protect the device from scratches."

How does that even work? It has to be one or the other, but not both.
rp2011 is offline   10 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Larger iPhone 6, 'iPad Pro' and iWatch Could Tap New Display Sizes in Development MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 399 Feb 6, 2014 04:21 PM
Apple's 'iWatch' Said to Arrive in Separate 1.7- and 1.3-Inch Display Sizes for Men and Women MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 167 Dec 19, 2013 09:29 AM
Apple's Lower-Cost iPhone As a 'Mid-End' Device MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 165 Jun 22, 2013 02:58 PM
Unibody top case replacement cost? UPDATE: I fixed it! Quicksilver867 MacBook Pro 6 Jun 22, 2013 09:19 AM
top-end 27" iMac vs top-end 15" rMBP chelch iMac 1 Feb 20, 2013 12:54 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC