Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:18 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
How Apple Could Make the Move to 4.7" iPhone Displays




Amidst the flurry of iPhone 6 rumors coming from KGI Securities' report last week, Ming-Chi Kuo presented the first possible screen resolution for Apple's 4.7" iPhone 6. Kuo lists it as a 1334x750 Retina display with a pixel density of 326 pixels per inch.

Historically, Apple has been very cautious with resolution changes in their iOS devices. The original iPhone was launched with a 320x480 resolution. Eventually, Apple moved to 640x960 Retina display, doubling the linear resolution in each dimension. That allowed existing apps to simply be pixel-doubled to fill the entire screen. Developers could then take their time to update their apps to fully support the higher resolution display. When Apple moved from 3.5" to 4" screens in the iPhone 5, they simply added vertical resolution. This allowed existing apps to run in a letterboxed format with black bars at the top and bottom of the screen.

Relative iPhone display sizes by Redtech
Right before the 4" iPhone releases, Apple began encouraging developers to use AutoLayout in designing their apps:
Quote:
Auto Layout is a system that lets you lay out your app's user interface by creating a mathematical description of the relationships between the elements. You define these relationships in terms of constraints either on individual elements, or between sets of elements. Using Auto Layout, you can create a dynamic and versatile interface that responds appropriately to changes in screen size, device orientation, and localization.
AutoLayout paves the way for apps to more easily adapt to changes in display sizes and resolution in the future.

If Apple were to adopt a 1334x750 4.7" display as predicted by Kuo, it would preserve the same pixel density (326 ppi) as the iPhone 5s. That means that all existing user interface elements, such as icons, would be the same size but would allow for more screen space.

Our designer found that using the exact same icons and spacing them out to fill the screen, 1334x750 pixels allows Apple to fit exactly one extra row of icons onto the iPhone home screen. This mockup shows the relative size of the 4.7" iPhone screen and how much extra room there would be using the exact same icons as on the current iPhone:

4" home screen (left) vs 4.7" home screen (right)

Meanwhile, existing unoptimized apps could function in a "letterbox" style with black borders for unused screen space. TheVerge forum user Pi is exactly 3 created a mockup showing this exact scenario. This image shows how an "unoptimized" app would appear (left) compared to one that has been optimized for the 4.7" display (right):

Mockup by Pi is exactly 3
Given Apple's past reluctance to blur or break existing apps, it seems that this resolution choice could provide Apple and developers a reasonable upgrade path for a larger factor iPhone. Apple has acknowledged that customers want larger iPhones and all iPhone 6 rumors are pointing to a larger iPhone device this year.

Article Link: How Apple Could Make the Move to 4.7" iPhone Displays
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:21 AM   #2
Yvan256
macrumors 601
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
I'd rather see a lower PPI than different resolutions.
Yvan256 is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:22 AM   #3
lars666
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Another row! Yeah!
lars666 is offline   35 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:22 AM   #4
edgonzalez32
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
I really like that a lot. I'd love to see the screen at that resolution.
edgonzalez32 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:22 AM   #5
bushido
macrumors 601
 
bushido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Espaņa y Germany
yay more space for another row of icons
bushido is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:23 AM   #6
iCore24
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Michigan
I still think they will double the iPhone 5s resolution, 326 ppi on a 4.7" is good but is not future proof. If they make a bigger iPhone in the future like 5" it would have around only 300 ppi, then will need to get ANOTHER resolution change! I talk about this in detail in a thread I made if your interested.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1699542

The iPhone can also handle the higher resolution, just look at the Retina iPad Mini, same specs and much higher resolution.

And they better come up with something more productive and creative to take up the extra space on the iPad and the iPhone 6 with IOS 8. The iPad just got the hand me down features the iPhone got on IOS 7, The iPad needs features that take advantage of the huge landscape,
Split screen? Widgets? Live larger icons? SOMETHING!!!!!

Last edited by iCore24; Apr 17, 2014 at 08:47 PM.
iCore24 is offline   25 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:23 AM   #7
JaySoul
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Maybe they should introduce on-screen buttons.
JaySoul is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:24 AM   #8
arian19
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
that letterbox looks terrible...
arian19 is offline   18 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:25 AM   #9
AppleAlex!
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
As an iOS developer I cant wait to have a new screen size (or two) to play about with when designing apps, the additional real-estate could pave the way for making similar UI's for both the iPhone and iPad
AppleAlex! is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:26 AM   #10
evilrt
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Jersey USA
remember when the trend was to build smaller and lighter? wth? so friggin ghetto.
__________________
2011 21.5" iMac 2.5GHz. The New? iPad VeriZon 5S 64GB Silver Unlimited AppleTV 3rd Gen.
evilrt is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:26 AM   #11
Tiger8
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by arian19 View Post
that letterbox looks terrible...
would look even worse if the graphics are stretched and blurred
Tiger8 is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:26 AM   #12
dlewis23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaySoul View Post
Maybe they should introduce on-screen buttons.
No.

A 1334x750 is stupid and doesn't make any sense. It will make app development harder since there is really no relation to any of the other devices.
__________________
SpeedSmart - The ultimate iOS speed test utility
FireFile.io - Cloud storage for all
dlewis23 is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:27 AM   #13
D.T.
macrumors 68020
 
D.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vilano Beach, FL
I mentioned this in a previous post: that using a 326PPI display would allow apps to retain the retina assets (they’d be slightly scaled relative to the display area). I believe this would give a 4.7-ish sized device touch targets that comply with Apple’s HID guidelines.

Then a little AutoLayout magic - that I’d assume will improve with iOS8 ( let’s say I _hope_ it will improve ) - and conventional UIs would work OOTB.

Some adaptive UI in the new OS/SDK, like the [...] nav overflow knowing it can add an additional icon to the bar, simple width expansion on canvas areas, table rows, etc.
__________________
"It is not daily increase but daily decrease; hack away the unessential." ~Bruce Lee
D.T. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:28 AM   #14
jabingla2810
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
They will just double the pixels, like they did on the iphone, like they did on the iPad, like they did on the Macbook etc etc.

Apple have always been developer friendly, and while this may seem like overkill, it will mean apps just work full screen day one, and it will put them just over the pixel density of the current 1080p screens, so it's not unfathomable.
jabingla2810 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:28 AM   #15
irfaanfaki
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
I wonder what the media and the "Apple is doomed" crowd will say about the screen not being "at least 1080p"

Personally I will be happy with 1134x750

Time will tell
irfaanfaki is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:29 AM   #16
kyjaotkb
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Paris, France
Seeing this 4.7" thing, I sorely regret the time when i was rocking my Nokia 8310...
__________________
13" MBA '11, 1.7/4/256 ; 16GB iPad 4 Wifi ; 16GB 3GS ; 160GB iPod Classic '07 ; 8GB nano 3G ; 1GB Shuffle 2G
kyjaotkb is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:29 AM   #17
Skika
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yvan256 View Post
I'd rather see a lower PPI than different resolutions.
So you want existing resolution stretched out to 4.7" or even 5.5"?

Top kek m8 thats horrible.
__________________
MacBook Pro, iPad, iPhone
Skika is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:32 AM   #18
redscull
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
I'd like to see Apple make auto layout mandatory for apps submitted to the App Store going forward. This layout concept of constraints and anchors has been in Windows since the early 1990s. That iOS didn't even support it until recently is just absurd, but now that it has it, it should be required. We should no longer have to worry about screen resolution fragmentation; hardware shouldn't have to continue being limited by this consideration.
redscull is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:32 AM   #19
shareef777
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by iCore24 View Post
I still think they will double the iPhone 5s resolution, 326 ppi on a 4.7" is good but is not future proof.

The iPhone can more then handle the higher resolution, just look at the Retina iPad Mini.


And they better come up with something more productive and creative to take up the extra space on the iPad and the iPhone 6 with IOS 8. The iPad just got the hand me down features the iPhone got on IOS 7, The iPad needs features that take advantage of the huge landscape,
Split screen? Widgets? Live larger icons? SOMETHING!!!!!
Having nothing but rows of icons on your home screen made sense when the original iPhone came out because the power just wasn't there. Phones these days are desktop class machines of yesteryear and Apple needs to get you more functionality out of the home screen. People multitask and having to go to the home screen every time I want to do something else is getting very bothersome.

The only reason I still have an iPhone is that my jailbreak gets me the functionality I want (and allows me to stick with the wonderful ecosystem). Apps like BiteSMS, activator, flipcontrolcenter, springtomize are the only reason I'm still using an iPhone!
__________________
MacBook Pro (mid 2012) | Retina 15.4" | 2.7GHz i7 | 16GB RAM | 768GB flash
iPhone 5S | Black | 64GB
iPad Air | Black | 128GB | T-Mobile
shareef777 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:33 AM   #20
jrswizzle
macrumors 601
 
jrswizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by jabingla2810 View Post
They will just double the pixels, like they did on the iphone, like they did on the iPad, like they did on the Macbook etc etc.

Apple have always been developer friendly, and while this may seem like overkill, it will mean apps just work full screen day one, and it will put them just over the pixel density of the current 1080p screens, so it's not unfathomable.
Problem is, 500+ ppi displays at 4.7" don't exist at this point. I think JDI's 500+ ppi display is a 5.5".
__________________
"Innovation, my ass!" -Phil Schiller

iPhone 5S, 5C | Lumia 520 |iPad rMini, Air | Kindle Fire 7" HDX
jrswizzle is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:33 AM   #21
D.T.
macrumors 68020
 
D.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vilano Beach, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by jabingla2810 View Post
They will just double the pixels, like they did on the iphone, like they did on the iPad, like they did on the Macbook etc etc.

Apple have always been developer friendly, and while this may seem like overkill, it will mean apps just work full screen day one, and it will put them just over the pixel density of the current 1080p screens, so it's not unfathomable.
From the current resolution? That would be 2272 x 1280, and on a 4.7” display would result in a ~555 PPI. I believe that would be severe overkill, from sourcing that resolution display, to the GPU, power overhead required to drive that kind of display.

I believe the only developer friendly move Apple might make is to retain the current PPI to reduce the number of assets required - that would also help to control package sizes as well.
__________________
"It is not daily increase but daily decrease; hack away the unessential." ~Bruce Lee

Last edited by D.T.; Apr 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM. Reason: Corrected doubled resolution, i.e., 1136 * 2 ... math is fun ...
D.T. is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:33 AM   #22
lars666
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by jabingla2810 View Post
They will just double the pixels, like they did on the iphone, like they did on the iPad, like they did on the Macbook etc etc.
What has that to do with the problem of the new size? The doubling was to upgrade the existing screens (which stayed the same size) to "Retina"-density. Or am I missing something?

EDIT: Ah sorry - just calculated that the ratio stays the same. I'm still too used to my iPhone 4S screen ...
lars666 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:34 AM   #23
GroundLoop
macrumors 65816
 
GroundLoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Just make them 1080p. Standard resolution for a lot of display panels. Developers with Android versions of their apps likely already have 1080p optimized assets.

Then let iOS 8 letterbox and/or scale existing apps as necessary.
GroundLoop is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:35 AM   #24
snappyfool
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jabingla2810 View Post
They will just double the pixels, like they did on the iphone, like they did on the iPad, like they did on the Macbook etc etc.

Apple have always been developer friendly, and while this may seem like overkill, it will mean apps just work full screen day one, and it will put them just over the pixel density of the current 1080p screens, so it's not unfathomable.
Why do you think just doubling the pixels it is friendly? The screen size is not staying the same size nor is increasing at the same rate. This means different scaling and developers creating new assets, doesn't it?
snappyfool is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2014, 10:36 AM   #25
green tea
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
but Apple and all the fan boys said 3.5" is the perfect size
green tea is offline   26 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will apple make Cinema / Thunderbolt displays as thin as the new iMac? carmeyeii Mac Peripherals 22 Jun 3, 2013 04:58 AM
About to make a move on a refurb 13", have a financing question aooga12 MacBook Air 31 May 12, 2013 02:42 AM
Make cursor move seamlessly between displays Sound214 OS X 3 Feb 18, 2013 06:22 AM
"Apple wouldn't make a two-tone iPhone" deuxani iPhone 19 Sep 9, 2012 01:14 AM
Could Apple make the Iphone 5 3.5" with 16:9? gadget123 iPhone 7 Jun 8, 2012 11:47 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC