Mac Pro 2009 set-up

Hi, I remember when I had the same questions but after trying different setups i came down to this one;

Ended using the original 640 which was later replaced with a 2 tb Red drive for bootcamp and installed Windows 7 after cloning the mac osx to an Samsung 840 pro SSD (128 gb for OS and apps).

Removed the optical drive and placed the SSD there. Also moved the 640 there as well so then I had 2 drives in the optical bay area.

In the other 4 lower drive bays in 2 of the 4 installed 2 Western Digital RE4 ( 1 terabyte x2) drives in software raid 0. - This my working drives so they are fast in this setup.

In the last 2 drive bays are 2 Western Digital Red drives (2 terabytes each) used for redundancy and backup. Each 2 tb Red drive mirrors whatever I produce in the working drives ( WD RE4 x2) so they are exact copies in both Red drives.

Hope this helps.

Levina said:

Thanks very much for your reply, Whaditis. Appreciate it.

Okay, so I could install an SSD for OS and apps.
Install 2 x 2TB drives in raid 1.
Install another 2TB drive for back-up. Could I back up with Time Machine on that one? Or is an external option better?

And I would still have my external drives for extra back-up of course.

So if I go with this, then which drives would be best: WD Red or WD Black? I know that Reds are best in a raid set-up and for continuous use, but my Mac Pro is turned off at night. And I also read something about a parking head problem with the Reds (like every couple of seconds)? I do like that they are silent and cool and are "greener" than the Black drives.

Click to expand...

As a WD fan, I can tell you that the Black drives are best for use in a system drive configuration. They have the best read/write performance of any drive in the WD family, which makes them great for installing an OS on or using in a Fusion Drive, etc. As far as the backup drives go, I wouldn't spend the extra $ on a Black. Greens are quieter and more energy efficient than other drives, and you wouldn't really need the performance boost for backups. The legend is basically:
Blacks - Performance
Reds - NAS, Constant Use
Blues - Middle of the Road
Greens - Quiet, Less Performance, Less Energy Consumption

Levina said:

Hello all.

I've always had iMacs and don't know much about the tech stuff and so I could use some help with upgrading my Mac Pro. It is a 2009 2 x 2.26 8-core. I have installed 24GB of RAM after I bought it but now the 640GB HDD is filling up and I want to expand. However, I am unsure as to what would be the best set-up for me and which drives would be the best for that set-up.

I am not a heavy user, just some surfing, some emailing etc. I am a passionate photographer and edit my pics using Photoshop and Lightroom. I may also convert movies using Handbrake or ffmpegX or some such app. I also use other apps in Adobe's Creative Suit, but that's about it.

Right now I still have the original 640GB HD, an external drive for TM and two external drives for my images (one on site, one off site).

I was thinking of getting two 2TB (possibly 3TB) drives for a mirror set-up but am wondering if I need that at all. Would it be sufficient to just get one drive as my working drive (OS, Apps and data) and another as an internal Time Machine Backup. Or is that odd or maybe even impossible?

I also looked at SSD's but I'm lost here. I understand how you can put the OS and apps on a SSD and use a hard drive for the data, but I have no idea how you would back up a set-up like that.

As you can see I'm quite lost. I've read a lot but the more I read the more I'm lost it seems. So I'd appreciate any and all help and suggestions. Thank you in advance.

Click to expand...

I have almost the same Mac Pro which I upgraded with a 250GB SSD boot plus 128GB SSD scratch drive. I have a 500GB Western Digital drive for working storage and a 1.5 TB Green for time machine. External drive enclosure for near/on line storage. 16GB RAM. My use is generally light as well; I also do digital photography (CS-6, Lightroom) and find this setup more than adequate speed-wise. Running from an SSD is the biggest plus and the fast scratch (optimally 4XRAM) is also worthwhile. With generous RAM, any decent HD will do because everything else is so fast; your just reading and writing to the mechanical disk minimally so it's not the bottleneck in this kind of setup.

Levina said:

Thanks, macmesser!
I was thinking about a scratch drive, thinking that maybe I could use the old 640GB drive for it. Is a 128GB SSD large enough for a scratch drive and will it be much faster than a HDD?

I've read a bit more and am starting to think that maybe I won't use a raid set-up after all, but do what you did: a 2 or 3TB WD Black with a ditto WD Green for Time Machine. In addition I would like an SSD for System and Apps and as said, maybe another SSD as scratch drive for Photoshop. So my final set-up would be pretty much what you have. It would save me money and with the external back-ups I think it would work well.

I was wondering though. The Black drives use "no-touch head technology." Does this mean they too are constantly parking heads, like I read the Greens do? I know WD have some downloadable firmware on their site, but the drives I'm about to buy are not included in the list of drives you can use it on.

Click to expand...

Probably your first upgrade after SSD boot drive should be to put in as much RAM as you'll want or need. This will effect the size of your SSD scratch disk, which should be 4 times the amount of RAM. (I have 16GB RAM but my scratch is 128GB simply because I thought I might want to bring the RAM to 32GB and I found a 128GB SSD for a very low price.) After RAM, go for SSD scratch if desired. For CS-6 and digital image processing I don't think RAID is necessary as one tends to work with a limited amount of data on the working drive and then transfer it off the working drive to some kind of external storage. If you were running a production line perhaps that would be different, but even my pro photographer friends (I'm not a pro), who are processing one wedding or shoot at a time, tend to eschew RAID for a setup like I have. It was talking to them that led me to my own setup. RAID would probably be a performance hit, anyway. Even striped drives would not be very useful since your work will be done from and on the SSD drives and basically only saved to the HD (or array). I like my setup because it's simple, cost-effective and if I decided to get a new Mac tomorrow every component could be reused in a snap.

I don't know about "no touch". Couldn't find anything detailed even on WD web site. If it were that revolutionary I'd expect it to be featured prominently. Anyway, I wouldn't think a performance oriented drive would be constantly parking heads; more likely it can in some way sense a shock via accelerometer or it's own gyroscopic effect and go into a protective parking mode quickly enough to forestall damage. The Green drives spin down more frequently but honestly if you used them for a main drive they'd be OK and there would be just a barely perceptible lag when accessed after being idle. As for the drive firmware, generally that's just a slight tweak and is very simple. It shouldn't really factor into your purchase decision one way or the other.

You might want to consider the "Apricorn Velocity Solo" card for approx
70 bucks.
If you fit this PCIe card with the SSD installed on it ( 2 minute job ) you will
have SATA III speeds and boot up / app launch etc will be super fast.

At the moment you would fit your SSD to a SATA II port running much slower.

For the sake of $70 you would save a drive bay / awkward fit into the optical
bay and gain speed

M.

Levina said:

Cool! Thanks for the tip.

There seem to be two cards, the Apricorn Velocity Solo x1 that costs $ 70, and the Apricorn Velocity Solo x2 that costs $ 150. Transfer speeds double (up to 800MB/s) when using the 2x card with two drives, which is very nice, but with just the one drive there isn't too much difference with the cheaper 1x card. On the other hand I do plan to buy another SSD later this year. Hmmm... Any thoughts on this?

Click to expand...

I can highly recommend the Solo X2, now that you've planned to buy another SSD later this year. Keep in mind that the extra SSD needs to be connected to sata connector / powered separate with cables. See this thread for more info's on 2x SSD on the Solo X2:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1675846/

BTW; Apricorn has now the DUO X2 in beta test fase, it fits 2x SSD on one PCie card for (much more) easy install, so perhaps you could find time to wait for it to come out. NO idea when...

CL & Cheers on your upgrades!

I just finished configuring my Leopard Mac Pro, Levina, and I'm really pleased with the outcome. I have an OWC Accelsior 480 GB SSD PCI card as my boot, with a 960 GB as a scratch disk and a 4 TB internal. The Accelsior has eSATA outs, so I can connect my external mirrored external and read and write at blazing speeds. All of my apps and fonts (things that don't change) are on the boot, and access is super fast…in fact I'm finding that optimizing my performance settings for the project are not at all an inconvenience because Photoshop launches so fast, so my actual efficiency improvement is remarkable.

Levina said:

Cool! Thanks for the tip.

There seem to be two cards, the Apricorn Velocity Solo x1 that costs $ 70, and the Apricorn Velocity Solo x2 that costs $ 150. Transfer speeds double (up to 800MB/s) when using the 2x card with two drives, which is very nice, but with just the one drive there isn't too much difference with the cheaper 1x card. On the other hand I do plan to buy another SSD later this year. Hmmm... Any thoughts on this?

Click to expand...

I just wanted a fast SSD "Boot" drive so went for the Solo x1.
All my data and working files are on either a WD Black 1tb or a WD Velociraptor
10,000rpm 1tb drive.

M.

Levina said:

Cool! Thanks for the tip.

There seem to be two cards, the Apricorn Velocity Solo x1 that costs $ 70, and the Apricorn Velocity Solo x2 that costs $ 150. Transfer speeds double (up to 800MB/s) when using the 2x card with two drives, which is very nice, but with just the one drive there isn't too much difference with the cheaper 1x card. On the other hand I do plan to buy another SSD later this year. Hmmm... Any thoughts on this?

Click to expand...

The x1 is slower than the the x2 and will work in the early Mac Pros. In the US prices are $49. and $90 respectively.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=apricorn+solo&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ma&Top+Nav-Search=

For such a small difference in price I see no reason for anyone with a late oMP to buy the x1, when the x2 works so well.

Lou

Levina said:

Well, you know, over here the x2 is double the price of the x1 so it's not really "a small difference in price". However, I will get the x2. Just waiting for the DUO X2 to hit the streets. Hopefully it is in the shops by the time I am ready to buy the second SSD.


I have two more questions:

How do I test my new drives? I've googled and saw stuff for Windows but for OSX not so much. Anything anybody can recommend? Preferably something open source (i.e. free)?

Also, I'm not sure how to migrate my stuff properly. The logical thing would be to simply clone my old hard drive to the SSD and then move the home folder to the new working drive and that will be used for data. But of course the boot SSD is 250GB and my old hard drive of 640GB is almost full so it doesn't exactly fit.
I could do a clean system install, but I dread at the thought of having to reinstall all my applications. So do U use Time Machine maybe, or Migration Assistant? Any advice would be most welcome.

Click to expand...

With both the Apricorn x1 & x2 cards, adding the second SSD is a PITA, they both have
the extra SATAIII data connector but no power !
So you have to physically fit the SSD somewhere and grab power from one of the 4 x
drive bays or from the optical bay.
Running cables thorough the oMP is not easy or pretty !

The x2 says 800MB/s but that's only in raid 0 configuration, you would need to backup
those 2 x SSD's regularly !

I would wait for the Duo card where 2 x SSD's are on one PCIe card.

So you cannot fit 640gb data onto 250gb

Personally, I would go with a fresh clean install and migrate the items that
you really need.

I think "Migration Assistant" is your best bet if you really can't face a re-install.
I just went through this and decided to not migrate, I wanted a new and clean install of just the
really important stuff and not 4 years of "invisible" crap moving over to my brand new Mac & SSD!!

I have several WD drives, both external and Internal and they have all been great.
Seagate don't get such a good rep these days ... I hope that's wrong as I have 2 x 3TB's as my
TM Backups !!

M.

I have read that 2.5in drives seem to be more "robust" for some reason.

I must say that I have several 2.5in drives that are still going strong after
many years ... one is an 80gb from about 1993 !!

I have just bought 2 x HGST 1tb 7200rpm 2.5in drives and I'm using one as
a backup and one in a Lacie Thunderbolt enclosure, having swopped it for the
slower 5400 that was in .... in a TB enclosure WHY ???

I have 4 x WD "Elements" drives from 3 or 4 years ago that are fine, other
than they just have one mini USB2.0 connection and are a tad slow.

Best of luck with it, perhaps do some "drive googling" before you commit ?

M.