Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 14, 2014, 10:32 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple May Adopt 1704 x 960 Resolution Display for Upcoming iPhone 6




Apple's next generation iPhone 6 may adopt a higher resolution display, jumping from the current iPhone 5s resolution of 1136 x 640 to a sharper 1704 x 960 resolution, reports 9to5Mac. On the rumored 4.7-inch model, this would result in a display with 416 ppi and the same 16:9 ratio of the iPhone 5/5s/5c, while a 5.5-inch model at the same resolution would carry a density of 356 ppi.

With Apple's rumored move to larger displays in the iPhone 6, much discussion has been centered around what resolution Apple will use and how any changes would affect developers. Some speculation had suggested Apple might simply maintain the same resolution as on the iPhone 5s, making a seamless transition for developers. This stretch process would, however, drop the pixel density of the display below Apple's criteria for a "Retina" display.

Alternatively, Apple could boost the resolution to maintain or increase the pixel density, although this move would require work from app developers to maintain compatibility with the new devices. KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggested last month that Apple would maintain the current 326 ppi density, which could be achieved by bumping a 4.7-inch display to 1334 x 750, and we previously explored how that might work.

But according to 9to5Mac, Apple may adopt an even higher-resolution display that triples the base number of pixels of the iPhone screen in both length and width. This "3x" mode would take the base "1x" resolution of 568 x 320 and expand it to 1704 x 960. Using this method, Apple would retain the Retina branding at 416 ppi and keep the current 16:9 ratio of the iPhone 5/5s/5c.
Quote:
This means that Apple will likely be tripling the aforementioned "base resolution" (568 x 320) of the iPhone screen in both directions, and that the iPhone screen resolution will be scaled with an increase of 150% from the current 2X resolution of 1136 x 640. Of course, Apple tests several different iPhones and display technologies, so it is possible that Apple chooses to take another route for display specifications for the 2014 iPhone upgrade.
Apple has allegedly been testing this 1704 x 960 resolution and while the design specs for the iPhone 6 are undoubtedly complete, it is not known for sure if Apple has elected to proceed with this resolution. Apple may be preparing to launch the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 sometime this fall with a faster A8 processor and improved camera technology.

Article Link: Apple May Adopt 1704 x 960 Resolution Display for Upcoming iPhone 6
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:35 AM   #2
Extrusionary
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2014
That's still the best rendering of a possible "iPhone 6". I hope it looks similar to that, but it probably won't.
Extrusionary is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:36 AM   #3
sualpine
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2013
Who cares what the resolution is?

All I want to know is how iOS is going to scale up. I don't want a pathetic new row of icons again.
sualpine is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:37 AM   #4
furi0usbee
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
I won't be happy until I have 1000ppi. Anything less than 1000 won't impress me at all. I want *really* crisp.
__________________
YouTube - Apple iPhone Support Hotline (Actual Phone Call Recording)
MacBook Pro 15" (Retina) 2.3GHz i7 / 8GB RAM  iPad mini (AT&T) (16GB)
furi0usbee is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:38 AM   #5
CosmoFox
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
So in other words... We have no idea what the resolution will be.

That's just macrumors being macrumors.
CosmoFox is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:38 AM   #6
Michael Goff
macrumors 68040
 
Michael Goff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by sualpine View Post
Who cares what the resolution is?

All I want to know is how iOS is going to scale up. I don't want a pathetic new row of icons again.
Maybe there will somehow be TWO new rows of icons instead.
__________________
Surface Pro 3 i5/256gb
Windows 8.1
Michael Goff is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:39 AM   #7
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
It’s been a year since I started speculating that the iPhone 6 would have an @3x display, and so far a common reaction is always “But Steve Jobs said pixel-doubling was necessary when introducing the iPhone 4!”.

It’s important to understand why @2x made sense to also understand why @3x does:

1) It was an integer scaling multiplier.

Xcode/Cocoa use a “points” system for every possible coordinate/dimension. Those don’t represent pixel values unless you’re using a non-Retina display (@1x). For everything else, the pixel dimensions of elements are found using points * scaling multiplier. For example, an iPhone 5 is seen as being 568x320 points * @2x = 1136x640 pixels.

If you had a floating point scaling multiplier, say @2.5x, you’d end up with floating point pixel dimensions as well. For example, a 85x45 points UI element * @2.5x = 212.5 x 112.5 pixels. Oops, fractions of pixels! Since the screen can’t render those directly, multisampling will be applied to “blend” fractions of pixels (think of anti-aliasing). What it would look like is this (on the right):



You don’t want this blurry mess. Therefore, you don’t want your UI elements to end up with non-integer pixel dimensions. That’s why you want an integer scaling multiplier. In 2010 with the iPhone 4, @2x was chosen in large part because it was the next integer after 1, not because it’s the double. That means @3x would be an equally good scaling multiplier as far as keeping integer pixel dimensions goes.

2) It didn’t require scaling interpolation on older displays

Steve Jobs explained that one pretty clearly at WWDC.



One pixel would become a 2x2 pixel grid. No fancy math had to be done to “scale” older apps on the iPhone 4. But why does this matter? Because scaling interpolations often reduce quality (not for performance reasons, that’s insignificant). Keep in mind however that unlike with the @1x -> @2x transition we had in 2010, this time we’d only have a 50% enlargement rather than 100%.

The thing is, a 50% enlargement with interpolation doesn’t look worse than a 100% enlargement with pixel-doubling, despite the loss of details due to the interpolation.

See those examples I made with bilinear interpolation (iOS’ default interpolation when scaling images):



As you can see, older non-@3x-optimized apps would actually look better on an @3x iPhone than non-@2x-opitmized apps did on an @2x iPhone. Add to this the fact that the screen's pixel density would be higher this time around, and the perceived image quality difference would be even smaller.

Another common comment has been "But shouldn't developers be using AutoLayout constraints, which make apps pretty much resolution-independent? Therefore, who cares about the exact resolution?"

Yes, they should. But the reality is that most apps (even those using AutoLayout) wouldn't magically scale well to a bigger display like it was a responsive website. They would require significant tweaking before they could do that, and I can't see Apple forcing AutoLayout everywhere just yet. That would essentially force developers to redesign/test their app in around a month, unless which their app would probably look like crap on the iPhone 6. Since that's kind of an unrealistic timeframe, it's the consumers that would end up paying in the end. I think Apple will go through a smoother transition than that.

With the recent introduction of Asset Catalogs in Xcode, I think it's pretty clear that Apple wants to introduce a new resolution. The fact images are still labeled by "@1x" and "@2x" also leads me to believe they're not ready to drop the points system just yet.

Last edited by pgiguere1; May 14, 2014 at 03:30 PM.
pgiguere1 is offline   64 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:41 AM   #8
regkilla
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California
No 1080p at least? Come on Apple get it together!
regkilla is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:41 AM   #9
barkomatic
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manhattan
I really don't see how Apple could possibly release an iPhone with a resolution below what is considered "retina" at this point. All major competitors have high resolution screens which are standard now. My guess is they go for 1704 x 960 at least. Anything less opens them up for unfavorably comparisons.
barkomatic is online now   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:42 AM   #10
perealb
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by sualpine View Post
Who cares what the resolution is?

All I want to know is how iOS is going to scale up. I don't want a pathetic new row of icons again.
Look at yourself! Why do you have to be so whiny?! "Who cares what the resolution is?" You make it sound like that's an irrelevant feature. If you are getting a bigger screen, of course a bigger resolution is an important feature.
perealb is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:42 AM   #11
amirite
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
I can't make sense of this news without a mockup compared to an iPhone 5!
amirite is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:42 AM   #12
Mapex
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Central New Jersey / New York City
Good chance we get 1704x960. This means iPhone 5-compatible apps will automatically be iPhone 6 ready at launch. The only thing developers and designers will need to do is include higher resolution graphical assets as these do not scale up the way UI elements do.
Mapex is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:42 AM   #13
DipDog3
macrumors 6502a
 
DipDog3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
 
Would you really be able to tell a difference if the screen was 1080p?
__________________

Interactive Phone - Try out the new Virtual iPhone 5s (Download Code @ RedRome.com)
DipDog3 is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:42 AM   #14
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by irfaanfaki View Post
Lol one of my friends sent me the 9to5mac article earlier and said
"So Apple iPhone 6 is gonna fail because the great bigger screen isn't big enough since 5" is the minimum these days"

Followed by
"And now we see the screen isn't even 1080p, meanwhile over here at Samsung the note 4 will probably be 4k"


Wasn't sure how to reply to him 😏
Something about lag usually shuts them up lol
Jsameds is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:43 AM   #15
brunosh
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by sualpine View Post
Who cares what the resolution is?

All I want to know is how iOS is going to scale up. I don't want a pathetic new row of icons again.
Just look at how much space is wasted in the iPad and you'll have the answer.
brunosh is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:43 AM   #16
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
Itís been a year sinc
marketing bull crap
Anti-Lucifer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:44 AM   #17
3bs
macrumors 603
 
3bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by DipDog3 View Post
Would you really be able to tell a difference if the screen was 1080p?
Yes. And no I don't mean if you're holding it an inch from your eyes.
3bs is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:44 AM   #18
BvizioN
macrumors 68020
 
BvizioN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manchester, UK
Send a message via Skype™ to BvizioN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Lucifer View Post
It's 2014 and not even 1080p.
Ignorance is bliss!
__________________
Born Albanian.
BvizioN is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:45 AM   #19
Anti-Lucifer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by brunosh View Post
Just look at how much space is wasted in the iPad and you'll have the answer.
Ios on ipad is just pathetic waste of screen space it's purely blown up iPhone os. Terrible.
Anti-Lucifer is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:45 AM   #20
furi0usbee
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
In other news, my iWatch better be 4k, that's all I have to say.
__________________
YouTube - Apple iPhone Support Hotline (Actual Phone Call Recording)
MacBook Pro 15" (Retina) 2.3GHz i7 / 8GB RAM  iPad mini (AT&T) (16GB)
furi0usbee is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:46 AM   #21
snebes
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Goff View Post
Maybe there will somehow be TWO new rows of icons instead.
Think of it this way. 1 new row, and 1 new column of icons. *bewm* I just blew your mind!
snebes is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:47 AM   #22
drew0020
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
I would make the change to 1080p now. At some point developers are going to make a significant change (and deal with this pain) so now is as good a time as any.

On a 5.5" screen the minimum resolution should be 1080p in my opinion. It doesn't seem to make sense to have anything less than that.
drew0020 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:48 AM   #23
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
I remember when people said that 1080p was pointless on anything 32" and below...
Jsameds is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:48 AM   #24
Nickerbocker
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Previously "new" iOS resolutions were supported by app developers so fast, I really don't think it matters much if they choose some multiple of an existing resolution or just come up with a new one that makes sense.

Early adopters will have to go a month or two with some pixel stretching. No biggie .
Nickerbocker is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2014, 10:48 AM   #25
cmChimera
macrumors 68000
 
cmChimera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
Snip
I remember this. Good call!
cmChimera is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transition to '3x' iPhone 6 at 1704 x 960 Likely Smoother Than Move to Retina MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 140 May 30, 2014 10:36 PM
Apple Predicted to Adopt NFC in iPhone 6 as Core Technology for Mobile Payments System MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 194 May 28, 2014 09:58 AM
Would Apple add HDMI-in to the upcoming Thunderbolt Display refresh? PatriotInvasion Mac Peripherals 17 Mar 25, 2014 02:21 AM
iPhone 6 Said to Adopt 'Bezel-Free' Display MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 280 Feb 17, 2014 01:23 PM
Is Grapher able to display values in the x-axis as π, 2π rather than 3,14, 6,28...? domenicop Mac Applications and Mac App Store 1 Jun 26, 2013 07:18 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC