Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 19, 2014, 07:51 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple and Samsung Negotiating Agreement to Settle Patent Disputes Out of Court




Apple and Samsung may be close to reaching an agreement that would settle all patent infringement lawsuits out of court, claims Kim Yoo-chul of The Korea Times (Via Fortune). This account follows a previous report from late last week that Apple and Google/Motorola have reached an agreement to drop all ongoing litigation between the two companies.

Samsung and Apple are reportedly in the early stages of negotiation with some key details on royalty payments still under negotiation.
Quote:
"Samsung has recently resumed working-level discussions with Apple and the key issue is how to dismiss all lawsuits," one source said, declining to be named.

[...]

"Some more time will be needed to fix terms of details such as royalty payments in return for using patents owned by each before reaching a full agreement."
Apple and Samsung recently faced off in a California court as part of the second US patent infringement lawsuit between the two companies. In the case that concluded earlier this month, the jury found that Samsung willfully infringed on three of the five Apple patents involved in the lawsuit and ordered the Korean company to pay Apple a sum of $119.6 million. Apple also was found guilty of infringing on one of Samsung's patents with damages totaling $158,400.

Article Link: Apple and Samsung Negotiating Agreement to Settle Patent Disputes Out of Court
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 07:53 AM   #2
VulchR
macrumors 68000
 
VulchR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scotland
A sad day for lawyers everywhere....
__________________
My first was a Mac+. Now I own an iPhone with 3.5x the pixels, a colour display, WiFi, 512x the RAM, >1500x the data storage, and 100x the speed. And it fits in the palm of my hand.
VulchR is offline   25 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 07:58 AM   #3
longofest
Editor emeritus
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
It is past time that this happened. Get er' done!
__________________
Never falling under anyone's Reality Distortion Field: Tech Perfect
longofest is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 07:58 AM   #4
Jynto
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
This is almost TOO good to be true.
__________________
15'' AirBook Pro (late 2018) with 5.1 GHz Core i9, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB SSD, and iOS X 10.12 (jailbroken)
Jynto is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 07:59 AM   #5
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
Hopefully this will happen, both companies probably spent more money in lawyer fees/court costs then what either ever gained.
__________________
~Mike Flynn
maflynn is online now   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:00 AM   #6
Cuban Missles
macrumors 6502a
 
Cuban Missles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Coast, USA
It would be great to see this resolved so that Apple can focus on developing new products.

Having said that, I will miss the mud slinging. Wait... no I won't.
__________________
I have a collection of Apple stickers from all my Apple product purchases - they are white (the stickers not the products)
Cuban Missles is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:01 AM   #7
thirumalkumaran
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Though its been said for a while...

But..

Steve jobs wouldn't have allowed this.....
__________________
Disclaimer: The opinions / Ideas given are my own. It does not relate to Apple, its vendors or subsidaries. Any resemblance to upcoming products are purely coincidental.
thirumalkumaran is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:03 AM   #8
miniroll32
macrumors 6502a
 
miniroll32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by maflynn View Post
Hopefully this will happen, both companies probably spent more money in lawyer fees/court costs then what either ever gained.
The outcome is less to do with money, more for personal pride and establishment. While Apple had every right to sue Samsung, one can't help but feel that there are double standards involved based upon the market share of a competing product.

Samsung haven't been the only company to emulate Apple design, but the nature of their successes (in particular, the Galaxy line) has clearly ruffled the board's feathers.
miniroll32 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:07 AM   #9
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by VulchR View Post
A sad day for lawyers everywhere....
Well, there are still all the hours involved in drafting the paperwork.

My guess is that the turning point was the last lawsuit. Apple reached the point of diminishing returns such that the lawsuits no longer paid for themselves. At the same time, they were still costly enough for Samsung that fighting on made no more sense, either. Add Google's inability to gain much traction in its lawsuits and so all parties have a motive to settle.

So patents won't be the thermonuclear battleground Steve Jobs thought they'd be. In the end Apple may get a nice little income stream for a few years, and maybe a chance to patch things up with the rest of Samsung.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by miniroll32 View Post
The outcome is less to do with money, more for personal pride/establishment. While Apple had every right to sue Samsung, one can't help but feel that there are double standards involved based upon the success and/or market share of a competing product.
I think the courts have been reluctant to allow software patents to be used as weapons to gain sales injunctions, and see royalties as the best solution. The decisions in cases involving Apple, Samsung, Motorola, Google, Microsoft and Nokia have mostly reflected that.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:09 AM   #10
Sunday Ironfoot
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by VulchR View Post
A sad day for lawyers everywhere....
You win the Internet!
Sunday Ironfoot is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:13 AM   #11
J.gerbes
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Wait, isn't this all part of Samsung's infringe now > stall > pay later strategy?

What's the bet that no settlement can be reached, with many months trying wasted
J.gerbes is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:18 AM   #12
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
You know some people are going to be all

samcraig is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:23 AM   #13
Tiger8
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirumalkumaran View Post
Though its been said for a while...

But..

Steve jobs wouldn't have allowed this.....
Of course he wouldn't! I mean afterall he never settled with Microsoft... oh, wait...
Tiger8 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:23 AM   #14
linuxcooldude
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.gerbes View Post
Wait, isn't this all part of Samsung's infringe now > stall > pay later strategy?

What's the bet that no settlement can be reached, with many months trying wasted
Since Apple already made an agreement with Google, I'm wondering if Samsung realized they needed to do the same as Google would not protect them any more. They also can't blame Google like they did with the previous trial.
__________________
Techshow:http://www.justin.tv/linuxcooldude
linuxcooldude is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:25 AM   #15
Razeus
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
So Samsung's strategy really does work.
__________________

Website, Pictures & Tweets
Razeus is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:27 AM   #16
ghostface147
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: May 2008
Excellent to hear.
ghostface147 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:29 AM   #17
MacSince1990
macrumors 65816
 
MacSince1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Fisticuffs, I hope.
__________________
Beige G3 w/1 GHz Sonnet G4, 768 MB, 400 GB HDD + 2x120GB, Radeon Mac Edition, ATA/133 PCI, 4-Port USB 2 PCI, 18x DVDRW, MacOS 10.4.11
15" Mid 2012 2.7 GHz Hi-Res/AG MBP 16 GB RAM, 1 TB 7200RPM 10.9.2
MacSince1990 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:32 AM   #18
John.B
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flyover Country
Samsung is going to do what they want anyway, regardless of any agreements that may or may not be in place. It's just how they do business.
__________________
Apple develops an improved programming language. Google copied Java. Everything you need to know, right there.

MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MD481LL/A MD388LL/A ME344LL/A
John.B is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:32 AM   #19
Mark Booth
macrumors 65816
 
Mark Booth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
If there's a cross licensing deal as part of the agreement, I hope Apple doesn't license the Samsung patent for making crappy products. Nor the one that causes the corporate culture to be one of steal first and fight court battles later!

Mark
Mark Booth is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:33 AM   #20
thirumalkumaran
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Start Stealing....

Great news...Embrace Stealing...

No wonder the world will end soon....
__________________
Disclaimer: The opinions / Ideas given are my own. It does not relate to Apple, its vendors or subsidaries. Any resemblance to upcoming products are purely coincidental.
thirumalkumaran is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:40 AM   #21
PracticalMac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exactly Samsung's tactic, as said by a previous article on the subject.

Fight until cannot fight more, then settle before getting stuck with a much bigger court imposed fine.
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible
Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2
Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster
PracticalMac is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:43 AM   #22
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by PracticalMac View Post
Exactly Samsung's tactic, as said by a previous article on the subject.

Fight until cannot fight more, then settle before getting stuck with a much bigger court imposed fine.
Of course some people are forgetting one thing. If it wasn't in Apple's best interest to settle. Why would they? Why not let it play out.

Personally I think this is a good thing for both parties involved. They should have settled many months and trials ago.
samcraig is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:46 AM   #23
captain cadet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by VulchR View Post
A sad day for lawyers everywhere....
They probably want a change from the legal battles of these companies - they probably want something less stressful than having a multi-billion pound company on there backs
__________________
Technology is the core of our World, Every person on this planet should take a interest as we are changing the human race with technology!
captain cadet is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:58 AM   #24
PracticalMac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
Of course some people are forgetting one thing. If it wasn't in Apple's best interest to settle. Why would they? Why not let it play out.

Personally I think this is a good thing for both parties involved. They should have settled many months and trials ago.
Didn't say it was good or bad, its just how Samsung does business.

Copy, get sued, fight fight fight, loose, appeal, loose, settle just before settling slapped with huge court ordered fine.
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible
Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2
Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster
PracticalMac is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2014, 08:58 AM   #25
eddieaus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
great, now Samsung phones will have a price hike, as if they are not already over priced.
__________________
2011 iMac 27", 3.1Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, Radeon HD 6970M 1GB
2012 Macbook Pro Retina 13", 2.5Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 128GB SSD
eddieaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple and Samsung Face Off in Court as Second Patent Infringement Trial Begins MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 49 Apr 5, 2014 02:59 PM
South Korean Court Dismisses Samsung's Patent Lawsuit Against Apple MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 57 Dec 20, 2013 10:32 PM
Appeals Court Rules Judge Must Reconsider Banning Samsung Devices for Apple Patent Violations MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 85 Nov 24, 2013 08:42 AM
Tokyo Court Says Samsung Infringed Apple 'Bounce Back' Patent MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 36 Jun 24, 2013 08:28 PM
Apple broiled, barbecued in court: Samsung PROVES pinch to zoom patent invalid tninety Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 12 Aug 14, 2012 02:37 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC