.....apple actually replaced their ear buds with beats ear buds and raised the price to $100, i mean you pay 3biliion for something why not do this? although most would say apple would never blah blah blah, obviously they saw something else other than streaming music, be innovative right?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
wouldnt be shocked if [apple actually replaced their ear buds with beats ear buds]
- Thread starter shawndc1
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
makes complete sense to me thats why i pushed (submit), i dont act as anything i was just making an assumption like 1,000s of people on here do daily.. it would make sense instead of giving away "free" ear buds..but hey you work for apple you know everything...and p.s beats break more than you think, the build is poor, name sells not quality of product
I agree with you that the quality is poor but Apple won't give them away for cheap. Apple is not struggling to sell iPhones and beats are not struggling to sell headphones. Why raise the price of the iPhone to include beats ear buds.
i had no idea they were that high, i try to keep the ones that come with the phone in good condition,
----------
cool, i wasnt saying thats a reason to raise it, but im reading they want to raise it 100...and no reason i read to date makes sense to me to raise it 100, they are already high price as is. i still have the iphone 5 (tmobile) waiting for the 6
The EarPods that come with devices are only $29.99. The in-ear headphones are the more expensive option.
