Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:42 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Reportedly Launching Updated iMacs with Faster Processors Next Week




Apple is planning to update its iMac line with faster processors and lower prices next week, according to a new report from MacGeneration (Google Translate). Citing the same sources that correctly predicted the MacBook Air refresh this past April, the website also notes that Apple may also include Thunderbolt 2 ports on the new iMacs and will launch them later in the week instead of the usual Tuesday release day as done for other Apple products.

Like the MacBook Air refresh, Apple may be planning to increase the processor speed of at least some configurations by 100 MHz by using a number of recently launched processors, including the 3.3 GHz i5-4590, the 3.4 GHz i5-4690, and 3.6 GHz i7-4790 for the 27-inch model as well as the 3.0 GHz i5-4590S and 3.2 GHz i5-4790S for the 21.5-inch model. It is also possible that Apple will cut the price of the standard iMac configurations to go along with these minor spec bumps.

KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo predicted last year and earlier this year that Apple would be launching a lower-cost iMac in the near future to address growth in foreign markets.

Meanwhile, recent evidence in the OS X Yosemite developer preview has also indicated that Apple is gearing up to launch Retina Display-equipped iMacs in the near future. It is possible that Apple may then initially move to split the iMac lineup, selling the Retina models at higher price points alongside cheaper non-Retina models. A lower price point for the non-Retina models may also help address growth in critical foreign markets such as China.

Article Link: Apple Reportedly Launching Updated iMacs with Faster Processors Next Week
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:44 AM   #2
Michaelgtrusa
macrumors 601
 
Michaelgtrusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere And Nowhere
So not in the fall, I wonder how big of an update.
__________________
iMACAll life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better.
TWITTER TUMBLR
Michaelgtrusa is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:46 AM   #3
zunairryk
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
So exactly like Macbook Air refresh. A 100MHz processor bump with probably like a $100 price cut.
__________________
2013 Retina Macbook pro 13" . iPad air 32gb spaced grey. HTC one
zunairryk is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:47 AM   #4
8CoreWhore
macrumors 68000
 
8CoreWhore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Big D
They'll need an adequate price gap between Retina and these non-Retina's without making the Retina's too expensive, thus these lower prices.
__________________
Late 2013 Haswell 15" rMBP... iPhone 5S iOS7... AEBS 802.11AC ... iPod Shuffle...
8CoreWhore is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:52 AM   #5
SoAnyway
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2011
The news of new iMacs has been lingering around for weeks now. At this point, I'll believe it when I see it.

Besides, my 27" 2011 iMac supped up to the max is still serving me quite well. At this point, the next Mac I want is a Mac Pro with a 4k display.
SoAnyway is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:53 AM   #6
lostngone
macrumors 6502a
 
lostngone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anchorage
If this is true, I wonder why they just didn't announce this at WWDC?
__________________
I would much rather go to my grave never needing my gun, than go there wishing I had it.
lostngone is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:56 AM   #7
Simoleon547
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2014
So... why not 5 months ago? I don't think they've launched any new Haswell chips better fitting since then. A retina iMac should warrant an event, why no invites yet? Better send the invites quick. This is just odd...
What rough beast this hour come round at last slouches towards Bethlehem?
Simoleon547 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:57 AM   #8
mad3inch1na
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
It is expected considering Broadwell delays. This could potentially mean that the updated MBA and the iMac will be released two months apart.
mad3inch1na is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:58 AM   #9
thekev
macrumors 603
 
thekev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by brdeveloper View Post
No Mac Mini?
I kind of expected one around WWDC. If they're updating the imacs, it will probably come then or maybe not. It's in kind of an odd place. They didn't update the macbook pros even though the cpus are available for a small bump. It would have made some sense if they did that and updated the minis alongside them with the same thing. The chips used in the retina macbook pros are more expensive than the old ones, and I think it has the biggest impact in the $600 model, as the price difference between the old 13" mbp chips and the new ones with iris (not iris pro) graphics is quite significant relative to the retail price of the mini. They do sometimes hold the mini back due to imac updates. As an example of that its last update didn't come until the imac was announced. The updated imacs were not available until December 2012, but the minis became available as soon as imacs were announced. The chips used had been available for several months prior to that, and the macbook pros that came out a couple months prior used the same chips. The chip price disparity and lack of macbook pro refresh are the things that make this one difficult to predict.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8CoreWhore View Post
They'll need an adequate price gap between Retina and these non-Retina's without making the Retina's too expensive, thus these lower prices.
If 4K keeps coming down, they could probably get pretty close in pricing and slowly phase the old ones out as they did with the retina macbook pros.
__________________
world's largest manufacturer of tin foil hats, none of that aluminum foil crap.
thekev is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 01:58 AM   #10
Michael Scrip
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostngone View Post

If this is true, I wonder why they just didn't announce this at WWDC?
They had a lot of materiel to cover in the 2 hour keynote at WWDC. I can't imagine them cramming in even more.

Besides... a processor spec-bump is best suited for a press release announcement... not stage time.
Michael Scrip is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:01 AM   #11
ohbrilliance
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostngone View Post
If this is true, I wonder why they just didn't announce this at WWDC?
The WWDC was all about developers and software.
ohbrilliance is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:02 AM   #12
iLilana
macrumors 6502a
 
iLilana's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
faster?

like the MBA's faster? i'd prefer an SSD price decrease than a retina screen. make the quad i7 1TB SSD 27 inch 2500.00 ish.
__________________
2010 27 inch iMac, iPad2 16gb, dual i7 11 inch late 2012 Macbook Air. iPad mini 32GB with LTE, iPad4 32gb. Still need 2 more iPads. Waiting on Mac Pro super bucket.
iLilana is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:04 AM   #13
lostngone
macrumors 6502a
 
lostngone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anchorage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohbrilliance View Post
The WWDC was all about developers and software.
Yes I agree, however if you look at past WWDCs Apple has released hardware.
__________________
I would much rather go to my grave never needing my gun, than go there wishing I had it.
lostngone is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:05 AM   #14
icyrock1
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by brdeveloper View Post
No Mac Mini?
This. I'm waiting for a new mini before I build a home server (it's going to be the "brain", and I'd rather get a slightly more powerful chip before I jump on it).
icyrock1 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:06 AM   #15
marioguarneros
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Retina iMac would mean one step closer to Retina/4k Apple Display.

I'd be very happy to see them release Retina screens on the 21"/27" sizes as this could mean the imminent release of Apple own Retina/4K displays.

I'll be ready to upgrade by the end of the year, looking forward to all the 2014 announcements. =)
__________________
My work: Dubai Photographer.
marioguarneros is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:11 AM   #16
dempson
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simoleon547 View Post
So... why not 5 months ago? I don't think they've launched any new Haswell chips better fitting since then.
Within about the last month, Intel released updated (slightly faster) Haswell desktop processors, as well as a revised series 9 chipset which is compatible with Haswell and Broadwell.

It was also rumoured that the first 10.9.4 developer seed had references to new iMac model identifiers. That points to at least a minor iMac update including the slightly faster processors, updated chipset and Thunderbolt 2 by the time 10.9.4 is released, which should be within about two months (before Yosemite). If this latest rumour about a release next week turns out to be correct, the new iMacs will probably come with a custom build of 10.9.3, and 10.9.4 would then include support for the new iMacs in the general build installed on all models, as per the usual pattern.

Quote:
A retina iMac should warrant an event, why no invites yet? Better send the invites quick. This is just odd...
A retina iMac isn't likely to be ready this soon. Apple probably needs better GPUs and good enough yields for large high resolution displays, so a retina iMac release coinciding with Yosemite or after Intel releases Broadwell processors (late in the year) seems more likely. Yosemite is probably going to be released at a special event in October, so a preview of the Retina iMac then is possible.
dempson is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:15 AM   #17
thebeeobee
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Why would someone want to waste GPU power on pushing more pixels on an imac? The resolution is fantastic, as is.

If you think you need a retina imac, then you are easily fooled by marketing gimmicks.
thebeeobee is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:16 AM   #18
mad3inch1na
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostngone View Post
If this is true, I wonder why they just didn't announce this at WWDC?
Ha, can you imagine Phil Schiller coming out on stage and unveiling a 0.1 GHz bump?

On the big screen they would have a 3.3 being crushed by a 3.4. "Can't innovate, my...yeah sorry guys, Intel is behind on their processors. I don't know what else to say. Thanks for coming today."

Last edited by mad3inch1na; Jun 11, 2014 at 02:30 AM.
mad3inch1na is offline   23 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:18 AM   #19
Simoleon547
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by dempson View Post
Within about the last month, Intel released updated (slightly faster) Haswell desktop processors, as well as a revised series 9 chipset which is compatible with Haswell and Broadwell.

It was also rumoured that the first 10.9.4 developer seed had references to new iMac model identifiers. That points to at least a minor iMac update including the slightly faster processors, updated chipset and Thunderbolt 2 by the time 10.9.4 is released, which should be within about two months (before Yosemite). If this latest rumour about a release next week turns out to be correct, the new iMacs will probably come with a custom build of 10.9.3, and 10.9.4 would then include support for the new iMacs in the general build installed on all models, as per the usual pattern.


A retina iMac isn't likely to be ready this soon. Apple probably needs better GPUs and good enough yields for large high resolution displays, so a retina iMac release coinciding with Yosemite or after Intel releases Broadwell processors (late in the year) seems more likely. Yosemite is probably going to be released at a special event in October, so a preview of the Retina iMac then is possible.
Yeah I knew about the new macs in 10.9.4. That macrumors article cited the guy who discovered the power management file differences and he's since updated it citing new information found in yosemite that one of the 3 macs will have a retina display. So it sounds like it will launch before the fall since it was mentioned in 10.9.4. A second good question to ask is how is Apple going to supply the bandwidth for a retina iMac, thunderbolt 2 still falls short of the expected bandwidth requirements. They would definitely reserve the retina for the premium model with discrete graphics though. Should be an interesting week.
Simoleon547 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:22 AM   #20
eastercat
macrumors 68040
 
eastercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX
I've been looking at getting an iMac, but the idea of a retina version is really tempting.
__________________
64 GB space grey iPhone 5S (AT&T); 16 GB space grey iPad retina mini (Verizon with T-Mobile sim); 2008 MBP 17" 2.5 GHz Penryn, 4GB RAM, 250GB HD 5400 rpm, 1920x1200 matte LED
eastercat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:26 AM   #21
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Lower SSD premiums is on my wish list, but I don't expect that to happen this time though.
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....
macs4nw is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:27 AM   #22
smiddlehurst
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostngone View Post
Yes I agree, however if you look at past WWDCs Apple has released hardware.
Yes but only when either a) they had new hardware to announce like last year's Mac Pro or, frankly, if there wasn't enough big news in the software side.

This year WWDC was entirely software driven with huge announcements across the board. Their two hour slot was so packed they were blasting by big new features in iOS with just a slide or two. Heck, they even dropped the usual 'here's how the company is doing along with a video of the latest Apple Store' opening. A spec bump iMac just wouldn't have made any sense in that context (and, indeed, would likely have generated negative headlines on the usual ludicrous 'Apple are doomed' lines).

Ultimately the PC industry currently finds itself in a slightly weird position as everyone is waiting on Intel. Broadwell is currently delayed thanks, it seems, to problems with the new 14nm manufacturing process and it's thrown schedules out of whack across the board. We're in the very weird situation of having new motherboards that support Broadwell on sale even though the CPU itself is still months away. As Broadwell is likely to bring significant power / heat improvements it's a reasonable assumption that new designs are built around those improvements so can't just be launched with the current Haswell processors. Hence most companies now putting out slightly speed-bumped versions of older equipment with any new features that they can get (in some cases thanks to being able to use the newer chipsets that should be going with Broadwell).
smiddlehurst is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:30 AM   #23
MH01
macrumors 68030
 
MH01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Meh, CPU spec bump. This is just Intel updating its CPUs, just like the airs .

A price drop is more important if true.
MH01 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:31 AM   #24
Serban
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
this update is clone of macbook air update...silent update with 100mhz and probably price cut. No TB2, i think they save for the October update
Serban is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 11, 2014, 02:32 AM   #25
bigandtasty
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
No Way!

OMG, if lowers their price by $100 that would be CRAZY! Might even wet myself. Just think of those savings! New iMac, yes Please!
bigandtasty is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC