Whew- that's good: I read the headline and thought that T-Mobile had unveiled a new tier for their JUMP! plan: upgrade your phone every week!
Nice idea. Back in March I tried the tmobile $30 plan on my old iPhone 4s and was not impressed. Had decent coverage around home, but when I took it on a trip to Palm Springs it was very spotty on the drive and while I was there. Now the 4s does not have LTE and that is the area they are improving. Might be worth a test drive again when all my phones are LTE.
If you want unlimited high speed data, pay for an unlimited high speed data plan. Your speed of access to other content is not being limited or narrowed. All data is equal until you hit your high speed cap.This isn't a good thing. Carriers should not be in charge of what gets to be "free" because those services get a tremendous advantage.
RIP net neutrality.
This isn't a good thing. Carriers should not be in charge of what gets to be "free" because those services get a tremendous advantage.
RIP net neutrality.
I mean, I guess it's cool that you get free music streaming.....
... but is it not weird that T-Mobile is going through your usage to see what apps you're using?
I mean, I guess it's cool that you get free music streaming.....
... but is it not weird that T-Mobile is going through your usage to see what apps you're using?
The potential for problems depends on how they decide to take this. As it stands, they are subsidizing the costs entirely for services they've partnered with and allow other services to contact them and sign up. Assuming T-Mobile does not cherry-pick services, then this would be a boon to all of them, particularly the ones with low amounts of data (e.g. the free, 500MB tier).
It's a difficult position for them. On the one hand, T-Mobile (seemingly) is trying many different ways to entice customers to switch to them. Paying for their customer's data usage in my opinion is a great way, as I'm now more inclined to stream on-the-go. But they apparently cannot win because of the "slippery slope" argument many seem to be making.
If All data is equal until you hit your high speed cap.
They stated in keynote, there is no business contract with music providers.
They want to do all eventually. Its manual and labor intensive to figure out all the various servers, mirrors and load balancing servers, protocols used etc and get whitelisted in their routers.
The only problem I have with this program is the $700 hold T-mobile puts on your credit/debit card. I can understand their reason for doing this, but a lot of people don't have that much money to just "put on hold" for at least one week -- probably more like one month before the "hold" is released and you have your $700 back.
I left T-mobile because of the poor reception in my neighborhood (I literally lived in a "dead zone" where any T-mobile phone would drop its call). I'd be interested in trying out their plan, but not with a temporary $700 ding on my credit card.
But that's just it. All data is NOT equal. Again, T-Mobile is giving certain services an advantage over others precisely because data is so expensive. If Service A is "free" thanks to a carrier, new service B cannot compete unless the carrier also makes its data free. Carriers should NOT have that kind of power.