Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 6, 2014, 05:55 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Report Claims 4.7-Inch iPhone 6 Will Feature 2,100 mAh Battery




Last month, new photos of a purported battery for the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 revealed a 1,810 mAh capacity for the device, which is a modest improvement over the 1,560 mAh battery currently found in the iPhone 5s. Now, ESM-China electronics analyst Sung Chang Xu claims (Google Translate, via G for Games) that the final version of the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 will actually feature a 2,100 mAh battery.

Citing sources at supply chains across China, the analyst also adds that the previous images of the battery showed test units. A capacity of 2,100 mAh for the iPhone 6's battery would put it below competing phones such as the Samsung Galaxy S5 (2800 mAh) and the HTC One M8 (2600 mAh). However, Apple's traditionally tight hardware and software integration will likely contribute to a more robust overall battery life, as iOS 8 will most certainly be optimized for the iPhone 6.

Xu has previously reported on a number of other rumors pertaining to the iPhone 6, claiming that the device will feature temperature, pressure and humidity sensors in addition to electronic image stabilization. In February, Xu also claimed that the iWatch will use optical sensors to measure heart rate and oxygen levels.

Apple will unveil the iPhone 6 at an event on Tuesday, September 9, with a launch of the 4.7-inch version likely coming a week or so after the announcement. The event may also feature the introduction of the 5.5-inch iPhone 6, which is said to ship later this year or early next year due to production issues. Both iPhones are expected to feature a faster A8 processor, an improved camera, and a thinner chassis.

Article Link: Report Claims 4.7-Inch iPhone 6 Will Feature 2,100 mAh Battery
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 05:57 AM   #2
farewelwilliams
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
would've been 3,000 mAh, but Jony Ive wanted the iPhone to be 1 mm thinner.
farewelwilliams is offline   83 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 05:58 AM   #3
GuitarDTO
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Don't care about the actual capacity, but actual real world performance with the software/hardware integration. I don't have too much problem with my 5 now though but this should make it even better.
GuitarDTO is offline   19 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 05:59 AM   #4
x-evil-x
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by farewelwilliams View Post
would've been 3,000 mAh, but Jony Ive wanted the iPhone to be 1 mm thinner.
technology evolves should everything stay the same thickness? they will continue to get smaller thats just what happens.
x-evil-x is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:01 AM   #5
Serban
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Better 2100 than 1810...because with 1810 the usage should be the same like iphone 5s...but with this extra we could get some 20-30% better usage
__________________
27" iMac late 2014, Macbook Pro 15" late 2013, 13" Macbook Air late 2012,iPad Air 2 gold&space grey,iPhone 6 Gold&Space grey,iphone 5s gold
Serban is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:03 AM   #6
ahlsn
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by farewelwilliams View Post
would've been 3,000 mAh, but Jony Ive wanted the iPhone to be 1 mm thinner.
Adding that thickness and bigger battery would also make the device heavier. Use a battery pack if you don't mind thickness and heavy devices. I want my phone to be slim and light and my 5s already have great battery performance.
__________________
 Macbook Pro Retina 13" late 2013  iPhone 6  iPad Mini Retina  Apple TV3  AirPort Extreme 2013
ahlsn is offline   39 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:09 AM   #7
GavApple
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: UK
I've never been so excited about the prospects of a new and improved battery for the iPhone honestly!
__________________
13" MacBook Air (Mid 2013) iPad Air 64GB (Space Grey) iPhone 6 64GB (Space Grey) Apple TV 3
GavApple is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:13 AM   #8
vseera
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Actually, I can't remember the last time the 5s lasted me a whole day. It usually dies down around 4pm, if I don't use an external charger.

The problem is, there is only so much optimisation you can do before the laws of physics take over.

A 4.7inch screen, no matter what optimisation iOS8 has, will take up power. Will an 1800mah or 2100mah battery last as long as an Android phone with a comparable screen, having a 3000mah battery? No. It just isn't possible to take away the power draw of the screen in software.

Of course, tasks can be optimised and the CPU can be underclocked so CPU processing tasks take less power.

I fear that the new iPhone will have a similar battery life to the current one, which is sadly not enough at all.
vseera is offline   30 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:13 AM   #9
allanfries
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada
It's all good. Already get almost 2 days on my 5S quite consistently, so I'm sure the 6 will have decent battery life.
__________________
13" MacBook pro 2.9GHz i7 ; 27" Cinema Display ; iPhone5s ; iPad mini2 ; appleTv3.
allanfries is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:16 AM   #10
Kilamite
macrumors G3
 
Kilamite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Scotland
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahlsn View Post
Adding that thickness and bigger battery would also make the device heavier. Use a battery pack if you don't mind thickness and heavy devices. I want my phone to be slim and light and my 5s already have great battery performance.
Look at what the competitors offer. Stop defending Apple for them choosing device thinness over battery capacity.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro 2GHz i7 8GB 750GB Hybrid | Mac mini 2.3GHz i7 16GB 1TB Fusion | OS X 10.10
iPhone 5 64GB | Apple TV 3 1080p | iOS 8
Home Theatre Hackintosh i3 3.5GHz 4GB 3TB | OS X 10.9
Kilamite is offline   25 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:18 AM   #11
Soy Cowboy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Is the Sep 9th date official, now?
Soy Cowboy is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:19 AM   #12
jkkool
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Apple failed to give better battery, i dont know why they are really not getting this thing done, is it that complicated.
__________________
Every thing by
jkkool is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:26 AM   #13
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by farewelwilliams View Post
would've been 3,000 mAh, but Jony Ive wanted the iPhone to be 1 mm thinner.
And the iPhone would be still be 12mm thick and would weigh 170g if people like you were in charge.
Jsameds is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:27 AM   #14
Thares
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dresden, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahlsn View Post
[...] my 5s already have great battery performance.
Really? My definition of 'great' is different.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/great

The battery performance is sufficient, at most. But it's not good. It's not better than the competition. And it's definitely not great.
Thares is offline   30 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:29 AM   #15
Fizzoid
macrumors 68000
 
Fizzoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkkool View Post
Apple failed to give better battery, i dont know why they are really not getting this thing done, is it that complicated.
If they give you a much bigger battery in the 6, then they won't be able to then sell you the 6s "with improved battery life"
__________________
"Cool... The 6th iPhone, running iOS 6, with an A6 CPU. The "5" name makes perfect sense. "
Fizzoid is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:30 AM   #16
rmbpuser
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilamite View Post
Look at what the competitors offer. Stop defending Apple for them choosing device thinness over battery capacity.
I dont care about the competitors neither do I care about the people who prefer battery over slimness I know I want slimness and no one can tell ME what should I want.

Having said that I think most people think like me and would want a thinner iphone than an iphone with 2h longer battery life, I also think macrumors isn't a real representation of most users so again I think that its irrelevant that there are people here who are crying for more battery.

Last edited by rmbpuser; Aug 6, 2014 at 02:32 PM.
rmbpuser is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:32 AM   #17
ahlsn
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilamite View Post
Look at what the competitors offer. Stop defending Apple for them choosing device thinness over battery capacity.
I do, and what Apple offer is more compelling to me. With my average use I have about 50% battery left when I go to sleep and I don't just let my phone idle in my pocket. So yes I think this rumored iPhone 6 with even better battery life yet thinner phone is a really good product.

When iOS8 releases with battery draining monitoring, I think many people will find out that bad cell coverage is their actual issue for bad battery life. When I switched carrier a year ago I saw an 50% increase in battery time and I live in a city where this shouldn't even be an issue. I can only imagine the problem in places that actually have bad coverage.
__________________
 Macbook Pro Retina 13" late 2013  iPhone 6  iPad Mini Retina  Apple TV3  AirPort Extreme 2013
ahlsn is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:34 AM   #18
keysofanxiety
macrumors 65816
 
keysofanxiety's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: In a house that defies physics by being colder than absolute zero.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahlsn View Post
Use a battery pack if you don't mind thickness and heavy devices. I want my phone to be slim and light and my 5s already have great battery performance.
Calling shenanigans on this.
__________________
"And they all lived happily ever after ... except for Pocket, who died of Hepatitis B."
keysofanxiety is offline   24 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:35 AM   #19
Fizzoid
macrumors 68000
 
Fizzoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmbpuser View Post
Having said that I think most people think like me and would want a thinner iphone than an iphone with 2h longer battery life
So no one call tell you what you should want but you can tell what most people are thinking?

Personally (and I'm sure the majority of my business users would agree based on current feedback) I'd like to see 2 more hours of battery life rather than a thinner iPhone as I find the 5 perfectly slim and light enough.
__________________
"Cool... The 6th iPhone, running iOS 6, with an A6 CPU. The "5" name makes perfect sense. "
Fizzoid is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:36 AM   #20
fardeenah
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
i actually want a bigger battery like the moto g atleast. i just hate it that my phone has to die during the day, while android phones can last for one or two days of heavy usage
fardeenah is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:38 AM   #21
Keane16
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahlsn View Post
Adding that thickness and bigger battery would also make the device heavier. Use a battery pack if you don't mind thickness and heavy devices. I want my phone to be slim and light and my 5s already have great battery performance.
Thank you.

People on this forum forget they're probably not the norm. My dad gets 2 days from his 5c - he's very light user, but I imagine there are more him then there are of 'us' on this forum. I get about 12 hours from my 5s. But I have an office job and I have a dock on my desk.

If battery was a real issue I'd get a battery pack case or one of them portable batteries. And I'd even look at other handsets.

Apple has offered 1 new phone a year. This is their trade-off. If it doesn't fit anyone's use case they need to look reduce the issue or take their business elsewhere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vseera View Post
Actually, I can't remember the last time the 5s lasted me a whole day. It usually dies down around 4pm, if I don't use an external charger.

The problem is, there is only so much optimisation you can do before the laws of physics take over.

A 4.7inch screen, no matter what optimisation iOS8 has, will take up power. Will an 1800mah or 2100mah battery last as long as an Android phone with a comparable screen, having a 3000mah battery? No. It just isn't possible to take away the power draw of the screen in software.

Of course, tasks can be optimised and the CPU can be underclocked so CPU processing tasks take less power.

I fear that the new iPhone will have a similar battery life to the current one, which is sadly not enough at all.
Your estimates are on the next iPhone are interesting.

Anandtech shows the 'tiny' battery in the 5s competes quite well against the 3000 mAh Android flagships.





More details here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7903/s...y-s-5-review/5

I think a bump from the current 1,560 mAh to 1,810 mAh would put he iPhone close to par with those flagships and 2,100 mAh would exceed them.

I guess we'll know for sure when the thing is released.
Keane16 is offline   23 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:38 AM   #22
Zxxv
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
6+ devices in 1 with the battery life for 1 device
Zxxv is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:40 AM   #23
enricopalazzo
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Considering a bigger screen and nearly 2x the amount of pixel, i don't see a battery life improvement coming.
enricopalazzo is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:42 AM   #24
ThatsMeRight
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
This could be a sign that Apple is starting to take battery life more seriously. This is a 35% increase in battery capacity.

You would only need about 10-15% extra to power a bigger 4.7" screen. And the A8 is rumoured to be a 20nm chip... so we can see significant power reduction there.

Yup, here is hoping for a real increase in battery life
ThatsMeRight is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2014, 06:44 AM   #25
Narien
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
To all the ppl who can't get through the day without charging, how many hours is the screen active?

It seems to me (as someone who is using a non-smartphone) that perhaps the phone is used too much?

perhaps some tasks could be delegated to larger screens and actually get the job done faster then on a phone?
Narien is offline   3 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC