I bought my 11 year old a very nice "dumb phone". She could call, text, and take pictures. The main reason I got it was because of all her school extracurricular activities so she could call for a ride home when she was done. Well... She hated her dumb phone because all her peers had "smart phones". Because of that, she never carried it and I was throwing money away. I gave her my old iPhone 4s and let her use it as an iPod for three months. Guess what? She always had it on her and as long as she had wifi access, I could always reach her. I went ahead and activated it for her and now she has her fully functional smart phone. She has been very responsible with it for 6 months and I know I can always reach her. By the way, it also has a Lifeproof case for those little accidents thanks to grandpa who decided he didn't need it.
Love this post.
Luddites might complain, but personal tech is a very real fashion statement. You can eschew that reality, reject it, whatever, but it doesn't change the fact that our kids are living with that. No parent has to provide their kid with a cell phone. Any parent that does, doesn't have to provide them with something as significant as an iPhone. But many parents do (myself included) and I find it surprising that there's as much incredulousness as there is over that idea.
I don't get my kids iPhones because it's a fashion statement, I do it because I can, they enjoy them, I can locate them whenever I need to (FMIP, etc), and they get great use out of them. But Old Yeller makes a very cogent observation: he/she was throwing money away because their kid was embarrassed to carry something outdated. Some people may not like it, but that's a not insignificant contributing factor to the decision of 'what device should I get my child if I'm going to get them one'.