Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

foobarbaz

macrumors 6502a
Nov 29, 2007
873
1,953
199$ - 16GB
299$ - 64GB
399$ - 128GB

would make a lot of sense. 100$ for the first additional 48GB, 100$ for the next 64GB.

(Right new it's 100$ for the first additional 16GB, 100$ for the next 32GB, which is a bit uneven, as well as expensive.)
 

TheNewDude

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2010
752
0
Yeah, I'm thinking the 16GB is for the budget iPhone.

They drop the 32GB completely and 64GB is the starting size, hence the $100 price increase. And if Apple is planning on introducing higher quality music, which usually is larger size files and requires more space, this would all make sense.

So the phones will come in two models. 64Gb and 128GB with the price being $100 higher to start with.


All speculation of course...
 
Last edited:

Locoboof

macrumors 65816
Jun 8, 2008
1,177
158
Bay Area,Cali
I honestly hope the only thing to separate the 5.5 from the 4.7 is the larger screen and storage capacity options. If it's got a faster processor or better camera etc,that I won't like. I wouldn't want to purchase the larger phone to get all of the features.
 

Serban

Suspended
Jan 8, 2013
5,159
928
Yea maybe a wireless chargin but well made and not the bulllshhit that out there now
A range of 10 meters will be ok i guess
 

xero9

macrumors 6502a
Nov 7, 2006
863
486
What is with people and wireless charging? It's so gimmicky. Unless I can charge my phone while still moving about a room with my phone in my pocket, I couldn't care less.
 

Locoboof

macrumors 65816
Jun 8, 2008
1,177
158
Bay Area,Cali
199$ - 16GB
299$ - 64GB
399$ - 128GB

would make a lot of sense. 100$ for the first additional 48GB, 100$ for the next 64GB.

(Right new it's 100$ for the first additional 16GB, 100$ for the next 32GB, which is a bit uneven, as well as expensive.)


I really hope they stick with those prices you listed above. I doubt it,but hope they do.
 

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,741
153
199$ - 16GB
299$ - 64GB
399$ - 128GB

would make a lot of sense. 100$ for the first additional 48GB, 100$ for the next 64GB.

(Right new it's 100$ for the first additional 16GB, 100$ for the next 32GB, which is a bit uneven, as well as expensive.)

Uh no. No way they're keeping 16GB and dropping 32GB. Well, I guess they can but I doubt it.
 

b11051973

macrumors 6502
Apr 8, 2006
426
543
It has seemed ridiculous for a couple years now that Apple didn't bump up the storage space. I guess I figured they'd go from 16, 32, 64 to 32, 64, 128. I didn't really see how they'd do this. The people that paid $300 for 32 before, would now only be paying $200. So, they would lose out on all that profit for the crazy amounts they charge for more memory. I guess they beat that by keeping 16 as the low one and skipping 32 all together. 16 is not enough for me, but 32 is plenty. So, I will continue paying for the $300 phone I guess. At least I get an extra 32GB of space. Maybe I'll keep more music and videos on the phone. That is of course if any of this is true. :)
 

Trapezoid

macrumors 65816
Mar 19, 2014
1,429
0
What is with people and wireless charging? It's so gimmicky. Unless I can charge my phone while still moving about a room with my phone in my pocket, I couldn't care less.

You know when I first heard about it I thought it was cool. The g3 has the feature, but then I read about it and its meh. Doesnt really give you Any more freedom then charging with a wired charger.

Minimal convenience advantage isnt worth the price to me. I'd have to pay for the 60dollar g3 circle case AND buy the wireless charging accessory which was like 70 bucks last time I checked.
 

Trik

macrumors 6502
Jan 18, 2011
370
1,176
Washington, DC
199$ - 16GB
299$ - 64GB
399$ - 128GB

would make a lot of sense. 100$ for the first additional 48GB, 100$ for the next 64GB.

(Right new it's 100$ for the first additional 16GB, 100$ for the next 32GB, which is a bit uneven, as well as expensive.)

I agree completely. I clicked here to say this exactly. I also think it's to drive up that initial $100 price jump. 16GB just isn't enough, but the margin is SO much higher on the 2nd tier, so Apple wants to encourage that even more.
 

bushido

Suspended
Mar 26, 2008
8,070
2,755
Germany
199$ - 16GB
299$ - 64GB
399$ - 128GB

would make a lot of sense. 100$ for the first additional 48GB, 100$ for the next 64GB.

(Right new it's 100$ for the first additional 16GB, 100$ for the next 32GB, which is a bit uneven, as well as expensive.)

i wish but we have to remember that we are talking about apple here. the company that bothered to introduce a 8GB option in this day of age instead of just dropping the price of the 16 GB one ...

---

first i thought 128GB COOL!!! but than i realized my rMBP doesnt even fit that much on its ssd LOL
 
Last edited:

AppleInLVX

macrumors 65816
Jan 12, 2010
1,238
744
A lot of people will be happy if this is indeed true. I'm ok with my 64gb,but happy for those that want this,if indeed this is true.

Same. my 4S has never gone over 40Gig on it. 64 is the sweet spot for me, it seems.
 

Jett0516

macrumors 65816
Mar 5, 2010
1,001
878
Awesome. Now I can save all of my cute and furry cat videos and play them whenever I feel cuddly in HD! Purrs..
 

Traverse

macrumors 604
Mar 11, 2013
7,688
4,400
Here
I want 128 GB in my iPad for videos, but it seems overkill for a phone. Still, if it's true I'm glad because many people on this forum have been asking for it.
 

Born Again

Suspended
May 12, 2011
4,073
5,326
Norcal
It has seemed ridiculous for a couple years now that Apple didn't bump up the storage space. I guess I figured they'd go from 16, 32, 64 to 32, 64, 128. I didn't really see how they'd do this. The people that paid $300 for 32 before, would now only be paying $200. So, they would lose out on all that profit for the crazy amounts they charge for more memory. I guess they beat that by keeping 16 as the low one and skipping 32 all together. 16 is not enough for me, but 32 is plenty. So, I will continue paying for the $300 phone I guess. At least I get an extra 32GB of space. Maybe I'll keep more music and videos on the phone. That is of course if any of this is true. :)

Apple is just greedy
 

ArtOfWarfare

macrumors G3
Nov 26, 2007
9,557
6,058
And battery last 3 days on a single charge!

I don't think you get the joke... the increase was so small that it obviously wouldn't matter. To make a comparable joke about battery life you would have to say:

Apple is doomed for having a 10 hour battery life. They need to have at least a 10 hours and 2 minutes battery life. Going from the current half day battery life -> 3 days would actually be very impressive and would throw Samsung's entire Wall Hugger campaign out the window.
 

ptb42

macrumors 6502a
Oct 14, 2011
703
184
An accompanying part supply list contains entries for NAND flash modules from Toshiba and Hynix in capacities of 16 GB, 64 GB and 128 GB. The 32 GB storage option is notably absent from the list, although the reason for its exclusion is unknown.

Perhaps Apple is keeping the entry-level model at 16 GB, but replacing the 32G and 64G upgrades with 64G and 128G, and retaining the same prices (+$100 and +$200). It would provide an incentive for more people to upgrade, and boost revenue (and profit).

Yes, it would be better for the consumer to boost the entry-level phone to 32G. But like the automobile manufacturers that start with entry level cars no one wants, and overcharge for the "options" that everyone wants, it's a proven business strategy.
 

cmaier

Suspended
Jul 25, 2007
25,405
33,471
California
Jeez, apple. Seriously? It's 2014! They should at least have a 100TB model by now. Guess it's time to pick up a samsung droid x alpha universe pro developer's edition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.