Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:43 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Outlining the Case for 1334 x 750 and 2208 x 1242 iPhone 6 Retina Displays




Throughout the past few months, a number of rumors have suggested many different resolutions for both the 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch iPhone 6, giving a variety of reasons as to how Apple will best optimize a larger screen size for both users and developers.

Prominent Apple journalist John Gruber has now given his in-depth take on the subject, suggesting that the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 will likely feature a resolution of 1334 x 750 with 326 pixels per inch, while the 5.5-inch iPhone 6 would most likely have a resolution of 2208 x 1242 with 461 pixels per per inch. While Gruber insists that he has no specific knowledge of these resolutions for the iPhone 6, he makes a strong case for why they make the most sense for Apple.

4.7-inch and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 mockups compared to iPhone 5s

Gruber notes that keeping the current "2x" Retina resolution at 326 ppi on the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 would be consistent with Apple's previous patterns on iOS devices:
Quote:
At 4.7 inches, 1334 × 750 works perfectly as a new iPhone display, addressing problem #1, showing more content. With point dimensions of 667 × 375, this display would show 1.38 times more points than the iPhone 5. At 326 pixels-per-inch, everything on screen would remain exactly the same physical size. There would just be 38 percent more room for content.
Gruber also adds that moving to a "3x" Retina resolution at 461 ppi for the 5.5-inch iPhone 6 would display an even greater amount of content while being able to render the same Retina pixels on a larger scale:
Quote:
Everything works at these dimensions for a 5.5-inch display. With an increase in area of 68 percent and a scaling factor of 1.06, this display would address both reasons why someone might want a very large iPhone: it would show a lot more content, and it would render everything on screen, point-for-point, a little bit bigger. And at 461 pixels-per-inch, everything would be amazingly sharp.
In both of those examples, existing apps would still be able to run at such resolutions, as optimizing current apps would be made easier considering the scaled nature of the displays.

The given 1334 x 750 resolution of the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 contrasts with information shared by luxury modified iPhone vendor Feld & Volk earlier this week, which came with a photo showing the display of the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 under a microscope with a pixel density higher than 326 ppi, perhaps 1704 x 960. That resolution has also been cited in previous rumors, but Gruber claims in his post that an iPhone 6 with a resolution of 1704 x 960 would only work well for 4.0-inch displays, as it would not show any additional content compared to the iPhone 5 when measured in touch points.

Gruber also comments on the possibility of both a 4.7-inch and a 5.5-inch iPhone 6 with a resolution of 1472 x 828. The claim states that such a resolution on the 4.7-inch device would render UI elements and text about 10 percent smaller, while such a resolution on the 5.5-inch device would equal out to be 307 pixels per inch, or only marginally better than Apple's original definition of the Retina display as being at least 300 ppi.

The iPhone 6 is expected to be unveiled on Tuesday, September 9 at a media event. It is likely that the 4.7-inch version will go on sale about a week after the announcement, but the 5.5-inch may be held back due to production issues. In addition to a larger display, the iPhone 6 will likely feature a thinner design, a faster A8 processor, an improved camera, a more durable Touch ID sensor, and more.

Article Link: Outlining the Case for 1334 x 750 and 2208 x 1242 iPhone 6 Retina Displays
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:44 PM   #2
Señor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: United States
Waiting for 1080p to prove us wrong here.
__________________
iMac Retina 5K: High End Model (2014) --- iPhone 6 Plus: Silver [Sprint] (128GB) --- MacBook Air: 11-inch (2014)
Señor is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:45 PM   #3
sputnikv
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
The title should be renamed from " 4.7-Inch and 5.5-Inch iPhone 6 to Carry 2x and 3x Retina Displays" to " 4.7-Inch and 5.5-Inch iPhone 6 to Carry 2x and 3x Retina Resolutions"
sputnikv is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:46 PM   #4
robjulo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Again with the "Apple Journalist"?
robjulo is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:46 PM   #5
jlake02
macrumors 68020
 
jlake02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: L.A.
461ppi on the 5.5"? Yes, please.

Oh, and don't forget the ~2900mAh battery!
__________________
iPhone 6 Plus; iPhone 6; iPhone 4S; iPad 2,3,Air, Air 2; iPod Touch 4 x2, AppleTV x2
GETSOME 1000 GETSOME Xtreme BatteryAde
jlake02 is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:48 PM   #6
lewisd25
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Well, if the 5.5" has a higher ppi, then that's what I'll get. Now I just need to find jeans with larger pockets.

Last edited by lewisd25; Aug 23, 2014 at 08:01 PM.
lewisd25 is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:48 PM   #7
Markiie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California.
Send a message via AIM to Markiie
4.7 = the new 5c
__________________
iPhone 6 Plus Space Gray 128GB AT&T, iPad Air 2 128GB LTE AT&T, MacBook Pro Retina 2.6 ghz, 16GB.
Markiie is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:50 PM   #8
snebes
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by robjulo View Post
Again with the "Apple Journalist"?
Big words coming from a Sanitation Engineer....

</sarcasm>

It's just fluffing up who Gruber is. MR is full of fluff. The last paragraph of almost every article is usually regurgitated fluff about other vague rumors, too.
snebes is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:52 PM   #9
thegrants82
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Huntsville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markiie View Post
4.7 = the new 5c
Yep, and we all see what the 5C got us.......There will be tons of used 4.7's hitting the market when people flock to the 5.5
thegrants82 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:52 PM   #10
myrtlebee
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by robjulo View Post
Again with the "Apple Journalist"?
Don't forget the "prominent"
myrtlebee is online now   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:53 PM   #11
Markiie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California.
Send a message via AIM to Markiie
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegrants82 View Post
Yep, and we all see what the 5C got us.......There will be tons of used 4.7's hitting the market when people flock to the 5.5
and looks like Apple is going to embrace the larger scale phone and make it the flagship iPhone.
__________________
iPhone 6 Plus Space Gray 128GB AT&T, iPad Air 2 128GB LTE AT&T, MacBook Pro Retina 2.6 ghz, 16GB.
Markiie is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:55 PM   #12
profets
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Excellent write up, approached logically on where Apple may go with screen resolutions.

I'm so curious/excited about the potential of a big increase in screen real estate on a 5.5" screen.
profets is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:57 PM   #13
nfl46
macrumors 601
 
nfl46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Give me my damn 5.5" iPhone 6, please! Apple is about to cashhhh out this year!
__________________
| 16GB Moto X | 32GB HTC One M8 | 13" MacBook Pro |
nfl46 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:58 PM   #14
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
This headline is misleading. Gruber is very clear that he has no inside information. These are just educated guesses on his part.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markiie View Post
and looks like Apple is going to embrace the larger scale phone and make it the flagship iPhone.
Based on what?
__________________
"When we se something huge and powerful we aspire to make it small and meaningful."— Jony Ive 
Rogifan is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 07:58 PM   #15
Viper2005
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada / HK
Why would they introduce more fragmentation into their iPhone line?
Viper2005 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:00 PM   #16
xmichaelp
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
I don't really care about what it has to be honest. Once you get into super hi res / retina all increases are negligible.

What I do care is a retina Macbook Air and iMac / TBD.
xmichaelp is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:02 PM   #17
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
The retina iPad mini has 326 ppi compared to 264 ppi for the iPad Air. Does that mean the retina mini is the flagship iPad?
__________________
"When we se something huge and powerful we aspire to make it small and meaningful."— Jony Ive 
Rogifan is offline   24 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:02 PM   #18
commander.data
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Those resolutions give the 5.5" iPhone 2.7x more pixels than the 4.7" iPhone. It'll be interesting to see if Apple does anything with the GPU besides just a small clock speed bump otherwise the 5.5" may be underpowered to run things at native resolution. Given how the iPad 3 struggles handling it's native resolution compared to the previous iPad 2 hopefully this won't be repeated.
commander.data is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:03 PM   #19
xmichaelp
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Having different resolutions with the bigger one having higher DPI seems kind of silly though. The iPad has the same with the lower cost smaller one having higher DPI...
xmichaelp is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:04 PM   #20
lewisd25
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
The retina iPad mini has 326 ppi compared to 264 ppi for the iPad Air. Does that mean the retina mini is the flagship iPad?
I have both the Air and the Retina Mini, and I find that I use the mini far more frequently. So in my mind, the retina mini is now indeed the flagship.
lewisd25 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:04 PM   #21
pedromcm.pm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Porto, Portugal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markiie View Post
4.7 = the new 5c
Well, the 5c is the second or third best seller in the world. If the 5s goes free on contract, you can easily expect Apple to have the 3 best sellers on the planet.

The high end will get owned, and OEMs will drown in a sea of losses if something doesn't change (like stoping the stupid pursuit of selling more devices at all cost, literally).
pedromcm.pm is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:07 PM   #22
Markiie
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, California.
Send a message via AIM to Markiie
Camera
PPI
128 GB option
Sapphire
clocked higher cpu (perhaps because of the larger screen)


Just off the top of my head, Rogifan
__________________
iPhone 6 Plus Space Gray 128GB AT&T, iPad Air 2 128GB LTE AT&T, MacBook Pro Retina 2.6 ghz, 16GB.
Markiie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:07 PM   #23
bigchrisfgb
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
So hold on, if I got a 4.7 inch iPhone then everything on the screen would stay the same size? So I would still have to zoom in for some content? That pretty mud defeats the point in having a larger screen.

They did that with the 5, where I everything was the same size and all we got was a few additional lines of text. The whole point in going towards a larger screen size is so that zooming in to see/read content is no longer required.
bigchrisfgb is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:08 PM   #24
pedromcm.pm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Porto, Portugal
Quote:
Originally Posted by xmichaelp View Post
Having different resolutions with the bigger one having higher DPI seems kind of silly though. The iPad has the same with the lower cost smaller one having higher DPI...
Phones are used differently (much closer). Lowering PPI would be a big step back.
pedromcm.pm is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2014, 08:10 PM   #25
AngerDanger
macrumors 65816
 
AngerDanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: doing the Dada Polka
I won't be happy until Apple crams 'em so full of pixels that they need to store some in extra dimensions!

And, please, for the love of my precarious sanity: GET. THE. PHONES. OFF. THE. GROUND.

AngerDanger is offline   41 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC