Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Nov 14, 2011
24,135
31,184
Microsoft has obviously paid big bucks to have the Surface everywhere. In studio there's a big Microsoft Surface logo on the kickstand and all the benches on the field have big Surface logos on them as well. It's just over the top and in your face. What's hilarious though is all the TV announcers keep referring to them as "iPad like devices". Can you say marketing fail? :D :p
 

willmtaylor

macrumors G4
Oct 31, 2009
10,314
8,198
Here(-ish)
Microsoft has obviously paid big bucks to have the Surface everywhere. In studio there's a big Microsoft Surface logo on the kickstand and all the benches on the field have big Surface logos on them as well. It's just over the top and in your face. What's hilarious though is all the TV announcers keep referring to them as "iPad like devices". Can you say marketing fail? :D :p

I do believe it has just about become a Proprietary Eponym:
E.g. Frisbee. Yo-yo. Jacuzzi. Kleenex. Band-Aid. Escalator. Jello. Etc.
 
Last edited:

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,474
43,396
I heard that as well, kind of funny, but not everyone is as technically informed as MacRumor members. iPad is the major player so they probably can't help but call it that.
 

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Nov 14, 2011
24,135
31,184
I heard that as well, kind of funny, but not everyone is as technically informed as MacRumor members. iPad is the major player so they probably can't help but call it that.

It's so obvious this is paid product placement. I heard Microsoft spent $400M on this. Watching the guys in studio yesterday not one of them ever used their surface while on air. It was clearly just a prop. This year Microsoft even created a blue case so the white Microsoft Surface logo would be staring you in the face while JB and the boys on Fox are chatting away.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,474
43,396
It's so obvious this is paid product placement.
Completely, MS is doing all it can to show that they have a better tablet. I don't know how its working for the NFL, but MS is pouring a lot of money to get them to use it.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
I don't see the problem; as far as I can tell, the Surface is "iPad-like."

The problem is paying the NFL untold millions to use your product and buy sponsorship and then having your on-air talent describe it using a competitor's name.
 

MacNut

macrumors Core
Jan 4, 2002
22,995
9,973
CT
The problem is paying the NFL untold millions to use your product and buy sponsorship and then having your on-air talent describe it using a competitor's name.
Guarantee that the league told all the networks not to call them iPads, after Microsoft made a few phone calls.
 

LethalWolfe

macrumors G3
Jan 11, 2002
9,370
124
Los Angeles
It's so obvious this is paid product placement. I heard Microsoft spent $400M on this. Watching the guys in studio yesterday not one of them ever used their surface while on air. It was clearly just a prop. This year Microsoft even created a blue case so the white Microsoft Surface logo would be staring you in the face while JB and the boys on Fox are chatting away.

Of course it's paid product placement. The NFL is a major brand in and of itself that pulls in a massive number of viewers and dozens of other companies want pay to get in on that action. Gatorade, GM, Visa, Riddell, Papa Johns, Bose, Nike, FedEx, Verizon all pay money so they can be directly associated with the NFL (not to mention all the corporate naming of stadiums).

MS is the official sideline technology partner (or some weird title like that) and teams are using the Surface Pro on the sidelines to do things like analyze plays instead of printing off pictures. I'm not surprised part of the deal was to get their tablets into the studios too since there's not many shots during a game where we'll see players/coaches using the Surface's on the sidelines (unlike, say, the new headphone/headset sponsor Bose which gets ample logo time anytime a coach is on screen).
 

Tomorrow

macrumors 604
Mar 2, 2008
7,160
1,364
Always a day away
The problem is paying the NFL untold millions to use your product and buy sponsorship and then having your on-air talent describe it using a competitor's name.

I don't see even that as being a problem. Plenty of advertising methods compare the product in question to "Brand X" or "The Leading Brand," often mentioning the product by name.

Even Microsoft has been running commercials showing how much better a Surface is than a MacBook Air, even showing the Air side-by-side on screen with the Surface.
 

willmtaylor

macrumors G4
Oct 31, 2009
10,314
8,198
Here(-ish)
...I'm not surprised part of the deal was to get their tablets into the studios too since there's not many shots during a game where we'll see players/coaches using the Surface's on the sidelines (unlike, say, the new headphone/headset sponsor Bose which gets ample logo time anytime a coach is on screen).

I too noticed that Bose seems to have struck a deal in the offseason.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.