Which is why im surprised you decided to post this rant.
It not really a rant, its correcting a very misleading bit of information that you posted. And it wouldn't have been necessary had you just admitted it was wrong rather then try to digress into a high school essay about the judicial government/etc. Have a read back of exactly what you suggested and then how you waffled about anything but the actual point where you were wrong. Someone reading that and your subsequent posts could very easily think they can get out of this situation by getting a third party to buy/return the stolen product.
He did not have legal title which should have been discerned before a credit was mentioned or promised
Even after my "rant" you're still labouring this redundant point. Even if they'd deliberately duped the OP into shipping the laptop back, they'd have done nothing wrong and the OP would have absolutely no recourse against them based on any such promises.
Last edited: