Are you an expert on visual assessment of human force??
thought not...
They are kids..... 90 lBS?
Are you an expert on visual assessment of human force??
thought not...
They are kids..... 90 lBS?
You car will also have crumble points...
![]()
Are you INSANE!!!!!!!!! So if I take a test drive in a brand new car and I decide that I want to see how well the airbags work, I am within my right to crash the car to force them to deploy? Because that is what I am getting out of your dumb@$$ statement.
There is a big difference between testing the device (car) as it is intended to be used rather than destroying it just to appease your childish desires.
If you want to do that, buy the device (car) and do what you want with it. Then it is yours to do what you want, how you want.
Until then, the device (car) is the company's (dealership's) property.
Apparently you've never heard the old saying "you break it, you buy it". If the product is used in a way other than what is identified/acceptable by the manufacturer then you forfeit the ability to return/replace the product.
You have to apply over 70+ lbs of pressure to the the 6/6+ to bend these phones. I don't know what you all are doing or how you have these phone in your pockets to create over 70/90 lbs of pressure. Go to a gym and pick up a 30 pound weight. Would you want to put that 30 pounds on top of your phone, whether it be an iPhone, S4, S5, Note 3, Note 4, etc.... I am sure probably not. Now if that 30 lbs seems heavy, consider you still need to add, 40/60 more pounds of pressure to the phone to bend it. Just saying.
Apparently your parents must have sucked at raising you if this is an example of your morals.
Mmmmm. Where in my car would I find these crumbles? They must be really well hidden.
That, or the dog's eaten them.![]()
If apple claims its waterproof, then yes its reasonable to test it. If apple claims t requires 90lbs of force to bend, testing it at the store with much less than 90lbs of force should be considered "testing the manufactures claim"
If apple claims its waterproof, then yes its reasonable to test it. If apple claims t requires 90lbs of force to bend, testing it at the store with much less than 90lbs of force should be considered "testing the manufactures claim"
Kids??
WTF??
They're probably 16/17
They're teenagers
They probably have more strength and energy than you
Are you an expert on visual assessment of human force??
thought not...
you spot on in regards to damaging goods.
In relation to the 90 LBS quoted to bend the phone, as you said, you have been in the gym, picked up 90 LBS, do you think those kids could have applied 90 LBS of pressure? no, 90 LBS is a hell of a lot.
----------
spelling mistake.
Crumple.
In relation to the 90 LBS quoted to bend the phone, as you said, you have been in the gym, picked up 90 LBS, do you think those kids could have applied 90 LBS of pressure? no, 90 LBS is a hell of a lot.
They're just kids, warn them and put more security on the iPhones.
yeah, unfortunately a lot of fanboys don't realize that they're not helping here...
I would consider myself a fanboy too; but I am a fanboy for a reason, I like higher quality products, products made with better material, products that look and feel great and that are more durable.
I have iPods and Macs for years and years, and with a basic level of care, those products stand the test of time, just a scratch here and there on the aluminum that gives them character.
This phone is different; first we can all agree it is much less attractive than the 4 and the 5; and having to worry about your phone all the time as if it was a baby is just an annoyance. Good technology, good design, should be there to help us with our daily lives; we should not have to think about it all the time.
Whether it is bad design or bad execution at the factory, something is not as it should be here, and the later they acknowledge it and repair it, the worst it becomes for the company. As fanboys, we should help them realize early on that it's a big issue if we want that company to succeed.
Lifting 90 lbs of dead weight is not the same as applying that pressure on a fixed point. The latter isn't as hard to do. This has been illustrated for a long time by the stiletto vs elephant's foot problem. The difference is the concentration of the applied force.
Extending that principle further: More effort is likely required by a human's rear end to bend a phone than a human's hands. A butt is distributing the force along its entire surface area. A human bending a phone with their hands is concentrating that force in their fingertips along a point that he or she already knows can be broken, if you just push hard enough.
In any case, all of this still ignores the obvious: People don't use their phones by grabbing each end with both hands and bending until it breaks.
Video not playing on my iPad "YouTube not available". Is it removed or do I thank Apple for this![]()
This video would never exist if it weren't for the poor engineering from Apple and the cheap materials.
Youtube pulled it because it glorifies criminal activity, i.e., vandalism.
Youtube pulled it because it glorifies criminal activity, i.e., vandalism.
----------
Aluminum is cheap? Uses purposely doing stupid, unnatural things is poor engineering?
This article speculates on the root cause of the poor engineering. Note, they mention it had NOTHING to do with aluminium but poor engineering.
http://bgr.com/2014/09/29/iphone-6-plus-bendgate-4/
There is no poor engineering. Just Apple's miscalculation that people would be so petty, jealous (of Apple's and iPhone's success) and stupid that they would need to over-engineer their stuff.
This video would never exist if it weren't for the poor engineering from Apple and the cheap materials.