I am surprised by the amount of resistance people are putting up to this idea.
Second, yes - people who choose to cost less should pay less. Just like car insurance, just like life insurance, just like toll-roads. If I go to the gym every week instead of staying home smoking and watching t.v.,
they don't make insurance cheaper, they create fake discounts.
They punish those who don't follow the rules that THEY set up. And they use any possible excuse not to pay when they should.
I eat a french fry, I have an unrelated heart attack... and they can avoid to pay for my cures.
It's very dangerous and intrusive.
and mind you. In 2009 a major insurance company wanted $900 a week (A WEEK!!!) because of a pre-existing condition. That's their mind-set, the last thing you want is for them to know what you do, because whatever you do, it won't be 100% healthy.
I just got a full medical exam for professional reasons (professional diver) and I'm in excellent health (even though that effort test almost made me cry like a little girl). I appreciate good health, but I also know for a fact that ten or twenty years from now, my exams will start yielding lower scores, and if I were on such a health plan, I'd eventually stop doing that pedometer thing, at which point I'll start paying back those "discounts" they gave me earlier.
What I mean is, they make it look like it's a perk, but it's simply a trojan horse. The more data they have, the better they can adjust the stats, and the more people will get screwed eventually (it's just a matter of time, and when it comes, you'll pay those small yearly discounts manyfold). Again, an iPhone analogy: you don't get it for $0 because you're cute or a good cuatomer, you're just paying it by installments with overpriced contracts, and in the end the resulting price is higher than if it had been paid upfront.
it all begins with stolen gnomes. you will have gangs, mobs and pandemics before you know it.
This shows how messed up the American healthcare system is. Hospital bills are incredibly expensive. Insurance bills are incredibly expensive. To top it all of, even if you have insurance, you still can still end up with a bill from the hospital.
The problem is you will never save $20 - you will be told that IF you use this app and they can monitor your health you won't pay extra $20. That's the way it works. And once it's out there there's no way back - using the app will be obligatory IF you don't want to pay EXTRA. And as someone already mentioned - you won't care until you get older and/or your health get a little bit worse - then they will know that immediately and you'll start paying EXTRA.
Get a job. Study hard in school. It's not that hard to make it in life. Heaven forbid people who come from war zones want a better life.
Oh, what famous last words from a company I once, repeat once, revered as a model for all others. Let's all now take a bow to both the almighty dollar and to the almighty insurance companies who are continuously making small incremental attempts to control our lives under the transparent guise of bettering them.
Think about how the use of GPS started out for civilians, and think about the dystopian ways it is being used today. Get the idea?
Enough said. I just hope people wake up to this sooner rather than later.
Time to review what we've learned:
The article MR twisted up for their piece contains no evidence whatsoever that "Apple is in talks with insurance companies" for any partnerships of any kind. The source article is almost entirely about large employers working with their insurance companies to control their premiums. But by all means, continue to discuss what Apple's partnerships with insurance companies will mean to you and the world.
you gotta think outside the box ...
I work for a smaller, regional health insurance company, and this is definitely not a bad idea, but I see problems.
We have a similar deal with BodyFit media... but you have to use a Bodyfit media device. This is why the partnership and feature isn't very compelling or successful, and also why it would not be such a hot partnership for Apple and Insurance
And most medical providers are adopting E-Record or compatible m-health standards that share medical data across carriers and health systems. Apple really needs to get on that train as well.
Time to review what we've learned:
The article MR twisted up for their piece contains no evidence whatsoever that "Apple is in talks with insurance companies" for any partnerships of any kind. The source article is almost entirely about large employers working with their insurance companies to control their premiums. But by all means, continue to discuss what Apple's partnerships with insurance companies will mean to you and the world.
I still think it's possible Apple is working on health related wearable device(s) and will partner with insurance companies so consumers can get it at a discount.
But why? Not that you're wrong but at least tell us why lol
A iPhone compatible anal probe? That would be a great wearable for the Wall Street analysts. If you are bearish on apple, you get a shock, if bullish a puff of lavender.