We disagreed about two things:
- The pricing of the watch (which I indeed said would not go beying $1000).
- The impact of the Apple Watch on the high end watch market (I predict it to have no major effect on sales of Rolex, Patek, Panerai etc).
I have no problem admitting being wrong in either when it is actually proven and Apple releases the pricing and we see declining sales of Rolex et al. caused by the Apple Watch sales.
I have no issue with being wrong. The issue is (and judging from the posts in this and other threads I'm not the only one) that we are consistenty presented by you with your opinion that is stated as fact. As soon as anyone comments or reacts to that by asking for backup or explanation they are aggressively attacked.
This is a discussion board, so no need to present scientific facts only, but is there really a need to approach everyone so aggressively here? Why do you do that?