Alternative option:
Get two 256GB SD cards on Amazon for about 80 a pop...
This.
About this Seagate drive... always amazed how much less costs much more LOL!
Alternative option:
Get two 256GB SD cards on Amazon for about 80 a pop...
Looks industrial and ugly.
Also Seagate is worst in terms of reliability.
Pretty nice, I use my 3.5 inch hard drives in a dock and the "naked" drives actually look much better than the cheap plastic/aluminum enclosures most manufacturers make. This drive is probably a drive and enclosure in one, which is how it can get this thin.
Though to me anything below 2 TB is tiny nowadays...
Also, shouldn't the ugly appearance appear in the list of cons to consider?
I've been using computers since 1973. I've NEVER had a problem with any of my Seagate disks. I have had problems with Western Digital disks. In addition, I've benchmarked WD vs Seagate and all my tests show my Seagate USB3 disk is faster than my WD USB3 disk. Your experience may be different.I wouldn't use a Seagate even if it was free. Complete junk, their stuff is only good as doorstops and paper weights.
I've been using computers since 1973. I've NEVER had a problem with any of my Seagate disks. I have had problems with Western Digital disks. In addition, I've benchmarked WD vs Seagate and all my tests show my Seagate USB3 disk is faster than my WD USB3 disk. Your experience may be different.
Your list of pros is a single thing said 3 different ways.
I've been using computers since 1973. I've NEVER had a problem with any of my Seagate disks. I have had problems with Western Digital disks. In addition, I've benchmarked WD vs Seagate and all my tests show my Seagate USB3 disk is faster than my WD USB3 disk. Your experience may be different.
Just look at the Backblaze data. Some of the Seagate drives have a 43% failure rate over 12 months ownership. Overall Hitachi is the best brand, which is all I buy. Western Digital is a close second (They now own Hitachi's drive division btw) and Seagate is like so far out there.
Every Seagate I've ever bought has died before it should have I always knew they were crap, but Backblaze who had over 30K of the drives backs up my experience. They are by far the worst averaging 15%+ failure per year with drives as high as 43%. Hitachi was all 1-3% maximum year over year.
I've never looked into other people's data. However, Blackblaze is an online back service, so they are probably buying (better) commercial grade hardware - not consumer grade AND they are probably using those drive in a much more rigorous environment. My drives spin up only once per 2-hours for TM backup and several times a day when I access them for other purposes. The Blackblaze drives are probably spinning continuously. Regardless, I've always thought Hitachi were probably made better because most of my Mac's were shipped with Hitachi drives.
I used to think that. Now anything below 100PB is small after working where I am now.
They only use Consumer drives. However they did a case study comparing Enterprise and Consumer drives and found no difference in reliability.
And of course they use the drives rigorously, but that's a good thing because their data shows the best drives. They literally had consumer grade seagates dying with a rate of 46% a year and Hitachis only 1-2%.
The drives were all Consumer and all 3TB and 4TB models.
So how are things at Fort Meade these days?
I'm in the private sector