Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Jacoblee23

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 10, 2011
1,474
717
I just got mine on Friday and trying to figure out the best looking display settings without taking much of a performance hit.
 

snowman1

macrumors regular
Mar 17, 2010
150
13
I always have mine running on 1680x1050 (13" rMBP) just because I like having the extra screen real estate. When I'm doing work that requires a lot of windows, I turn it up to 1920x1200 (I used a trial of SwitchResX to create this custom resolution)...which makes things a tad bit too small, but it's useful nonetheless.

I haven't seen any performance hits from using either of these two resolutions; HOWEVER, I have "reduce transparency" checked in System Preferences which helps A LOT in reducing UI lag. 1680x1050 is alright without the reduce transparency setting, but 1920x1200 becomes noticeably laggy. Battery life is also fine when using these two resolutions.

EDIT: I have a 2014 rMBP, so your 2015 model should fare even better than mine!
 

Jacoblee23

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 10, 2011
1,474
717
I always have mine running on 1680x1050 (13" rMBP) just because I like having the extra screen real estate. When I'm doing work that requires a lot of windows, I turn it up to 1920x1200 (I used a trial of SwitchResX to create this custom resolution)...which makes things a tad bit too small, but it's useful nonetheless.

I haven't seen any performance hits from using either of these two resolutions; HOWEVER, I have "reduce transparency" checked in System Preferences which helps A LOT in reducing UI lag. 1680x1050 is alright without the reduce transparency setting, but 1920x1200 becomes noticeably laggy. Battery life is also fine when using these two resolutions.

EDIT: I have a 2014 rMBP, so your 2015 model should fare even better than mine!

Thank you very much! What does the reducing transparency do?
 

redheeler

macrumors G3
Oct 17, 2014
8,419
8,841
Colorado, USA
I run my late 2013 rMBP on native 1280x800 HiDPI. I can get by with the smaller amount of screen space it offers while not having to see the minute bit of quality loss resulting from scaled resolutions.

----------

Thank you very much! What does the reducing transparency do?

Try it. System Preferences > Accessibility > Reduce transparency. It does help somewhat to reduce lag.
 

snowman1

macrumors regular
Mar 17, 2010
150
13
Thank you very much! What does the reducing transparency do?

It basically gets rid of a lot of the frosted glass effects that you see in Yosemite. Ex: menu bar, notification center, volume indicator, menus, etc. all become opaque. As redheeler said above, you should try it out!
 

dmccloud

macrumors 68030
Sep 7, 2009
2,976
1,705
Anchorage, AK
I set mine to one stop above the default res on my 15" rMBP. Gives me a little more screen space without compromising sharpness.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-04-26 at 9.56.43 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-04-26 at 9.56.43 AM.png
    230.2 KB · Views: 51

vantt1

macrumors member
Aug 8, 2014
67
2
I just got mine on Friday and trying to figure out the best looking display settings without taking much of a performance hit.
I used to have mine set at "Looks like 1680x1050", but at this setting it's not possible to use Windows in a virtual machine at the Mac's native 2880x1800 resolution so it looks blurry no matter which resolution the VM's set at. Lag is also noticeable at this setting when scrolling in, say, Maps in full screen. Now I use the default native retina setting. Apple is right when they say "Using a scaled resolution may affect performance", because the Mac actually renders the display at what that resolution "looks like".

ElhHNhm.jpg
 

hamiltonDSi

macrumors 68000
Jul 29, 2012
1,588
273
Romania
I'm the "default guy" :)

15" rMBP Late 2013.
 

Attachments

  • Captur? de ecran din 2015.04.27 la 14.22.30.png
    Captur? de ecran din 2015.04.27 la 14.22.30.png
    309.7 KB · Views: 52

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,127
3,030
East of Eden
I run mine at the 1440x900 scaled setting. The 1680x1050 setting is little too small for me.

I ran mine at 1680x1050 for a long time but for comparability reasons I set it to 1440x900 when I was using a rMB and I have decided that I prefer the 1440x900 setting.
 

CaptainChunk

macrumors 68020
Apr 16, 2008
2,142
6
Phoenix, AZ
I ran mine at 1680x1050 for a long time but for comparability reasons I set it to 1440x900 when I was using a rMB and I have decided that I prefer the 1440x900 setting.

Yeah, I think that setting is the perfect balance between screen real estate and visibility on the 13" model.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.