Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Apple Software > Mac OS X Forums > Mac OS X
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:44 AM   #1
Diatribe
macrumors 68040
 
Diatribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Costa Rica (yes, I moved)
No Airdisk (Airport) Time Machine Backups!

As the title says Apple took out Time Machine Backups via Airdisk (AEBS).

While I think the way it has been running for some people this makes sense, they should have never marketed that feature. I bet there are around 30-40% of new AEBS owners out there that bought it for exactly that feature tat now are going to be pissed.

I for one hope they fix the problems and bring it back, but only time will tell I guess.
__________________
Knowledge - fueled by curiosity
Mac Beginner's Guide | My Adium Xtras
Diatribe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:48 AM   #2
D1G1T4L
macrumors 6502a
 
D1G1T4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Maybe once the firmware is fixed they will roll out support.
__________________
Macbook Pro 15"|2.8GHz|4GB Ram|500GB HD
32GB iPhone
16GB Nano
TV
D1G1T4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:50 AM   #3
JSpence
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
I'm disappointed. This was honestly one of the things I was hoping for most! I'm a lappy user, AirDisk support would've just been ideal. Wahhh
__________________
l SR MB l 4GB l 2.2GHz l 120GB HD l
Think Different
JSpence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:53 AM   #4
yetanotherdave
macrumors Demi-God
 
yetanotherdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Weston-Super-Mare, England
Send a message via AIM to yetanotherdave Send a message via MSN to yetanotherdave Send a message via Yahoo to yetanotherdave
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diatribe View Post
I bet there are around 30-40% of new AEBS owners out there that bought it for exactly that feature tat now are going to be pissed.
I was almost one of them, but my cars starter motor burning out left me lacking in money, so I held off. Glad I did now, but it will be a real pain to remember to attatch my disk to the lappy regulary!
__________________
yetanotherdave.com | twitter.com/yetanotherdave
Uni MacBook Pro SD | 2.66Ghz Core2Duo | 320Gb | 4Gb | 10.6.2
iPhone 3g White 16Gb
yetanotherdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 07:10 AM   #5
saxman
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2004
Well that's bad news for lots of people - especially mobile users. I'm beginning to wonder if Apple bit of more than they could chew with the AEBS disk feature. Must be harder than they thought
saxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 07:16 AM   #6
superleccy
macrumors 6502a
 
superleccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Actually I'm not surprised. I've heard anecdotal evidence that the read/write speed of Airdisk is rather on the slow side. I wonder if trying to implement Time Machine over AirDisk would just be too slow... or worse, actually slow down your Mac.

I've not bought a new Airport Extreme yet anyway because I'm waiting for them to add AirTunes.

SL
__________________
15" MBP: 2.4GHz C2D SR; now 4GB RAM; 160GB 5400rpm HD; Matte; 20" Cinema Disp.
14" iBook G4: 1.33GHz; 768MB RAM; 80GB HD.
Switched Nov '04.
superleccy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 08:14 AM   #7
Tygernoot
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
I'm probably going to say something stupid, but I need to know .

Do you mean by Airport Disk that it's a HD connected to the Airport Extreme basestation, and that's it's impossible (for now) to create Time Machine backups to that drive even if you are connected through the 1GBit ethernet?

I have three macs at home and wanted to replace my current router by the Airport Extreme, so I can use gigabit ethernet and have one central HD where all Time Machine backups would go.

As long as that isn't possible I see no point in buying the Airport Extreme basestation.
__________________
Always look on the bright side of life.
Tygernoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 09:10 AM   #8
zen
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tygernoot View Post
I'm probably going to say something stupid, but I need to know .

Do you mean by Airport Disk that it's a HD connected to the Airport Extreme basestation, and that's it's impossible (for now) to create Time Machine backups to that drive even if you are connected through the 1GBit ethernet?

I have three macs at home and wanted to replace my current router by the Airport Extreme, so I can use gigabit ethernet and have one central HD where all Time Machine backups would go.

As long as that isn't possible I see no point in buying the Airport Extreme basestation.
Correct. And that's why I was about to buy an Airport Extreme Basestation too, as we have two laptops and an iMac, and backing up the portables to a plug-in external HDD is going to be TEDIOUS.

Dropped a big one there Apple!
__________________
Alu iMac | 20" | 2.4Ghz | 4GB 667 MHz DDR2 RAM | 500GB HDD
Alu iMac | 20" | 2.66Ghz | 4GB 800 MHz DDR2 RAM | 320GB HDD
zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 09:21 AM   #9
Le Big Mac
macrumors 68010
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by zen View Post

Dropped a big one there Apple!
For now, at least.

I have this feeling that Time Machine will at some point (a year?) be revolutionary and one of those "every one needs it" programs that Microsoft will integrate into the next version of windows.

But, in the meantime it's going to take some work to work out kinks and get it running smoothly in a way that's convenient for all users.
Le Big Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 09:21 AM   #10
Nuc
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
I've found using the airport disk to be very slow even when at home and away from home. Hopefully they will fix this in the future...

Nuc
__________________
17" MBP C2D
iPod HP 4G 40GB
Black iPod Nano 2GB & Nike+
Nuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 09:42 AM   #11
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
i'm surprised that they changed their minds....hopefully they'll bring the support later
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:01 AM   #12
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Yeah this does really suck, as it's ideal for laptop users. It has to be a performance issue, because by all accounts it was working in previous developer betas. Knowing Steve, if it isn't fast enough or cool enough, it ain't shipping.

They must add this later tough. Too many people were banking on it for TM use for them to not. I expect it in 10.5.1.
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:06 AM   #13
wwooden
macrumors 68000
 
wwooden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colchester, VT
Send a message via AIM to wwooden Send a message via Skype™ to wwooden
Wow, this is a big blow. I bought the AEBS just for this reason, not sure what we are going to do now. I can understand it taking a long time to update the first time, but after that, it should be invisible, I don't think most people are making huge changes per hour. This is a real shame.
__________________
20" Al iMac, 2.66GHz, 2gb RAM, 500gb HD; 2.4GHz BlackBook; iPhone 3G 16gig Black; Nikon D50; 40gig AppleTV; 60gig iPod Video; 40gig PS3 - wwooden
wwooden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:09 AM   #14
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwooden View Post
Wow, this is a big blow. I bought the AEBS just for this reason, not sure what we are going to do now. I can understand it taking a long time to update the first time, but after that, it should be invisible, I don't think most people are making huge changes per hour. This is a real shame.
Yeah. It'll be back, I'm sure. Probably soon.
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:11 AM   #15
DylanG
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
It's not just Airport disks. Time Machine can't backup to any network drives. This worked fine in earlier betas and is a huge disappointment for me.
DylanG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:12 AM   #16
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanG View Post
It's not just Airport disks. Time Machine can't backup to any network drives. This worked fine in earlier betas and is a huge disappointment for me.
Not entirely true. It can backup to network drives, but they have to be running off of a Leopard-based system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple.com
Time Machine can also back up to another Mac running Leopard with Personal File Sharing, Leopard Server, or Xsan storage devices.
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:14 AM   #17
D1G1T4L
macrumors 6502a
 
D1G1T4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanG View Post
It's not just Airport disks. Time Machine can't backup to any network drives. This worked fine in earlier betas and is a huge disappointment for me.
This includes NAS drives?
__________________
Macbook Pro 15"|2.8GHz|4GB Ram|500GB HD
32GB iPhone
16GB Nano
TV
D1G1T4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:15 AM   #18
DylanG
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoreanGrae View Post
Not entirely true. It can backup to network drives, but they have to be running off of a Leopard-based system.
Sorry, my mistake. The beta could back up to a Tiger share and I assumed support for network drives had been removed altogether when I couldn't do that now.
DylanG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:16 AM   #19
FJ218700
macrumors 68000
 
FJ218700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blue Dot, Red State
bummer dude, I was planning on picking up an AEB with Leopard for this very reason. Apple just lost $160.
__________________
Lab: 3.0 ghz octo MP
Mobile: 1.33 ghz 12' PB
twitter.com/Dr_H
twitter.com/TapeSlave
FJ218700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:17 AM   #20
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJ218700 View Post
bummer dude, I was planning on picking up an AEB with Leopard for this very reason. Apple just lost $160.
They'll get that $160 one way or another.
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:17 AM   #21
D1G1T4L
macrumors 6502a
 
D1G1T4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Interested to see someone with a ReadyNAS NV+ try and see if they are able to use it with Time Machine.
__________________
Macbook Pro 15"|2.8GHz|4GB Ram|500GB HD
32GB iPhone
16GB Nano
TV
D1G1T4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:18 AM   #22
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanG View Post
Sorry, my mistake. The beta could back up to a Tiger share and I assumed support for network drives had been removed altogether when I couldn't do that now.
Easy mistake to make. I'm sure for those people out there who have Leopard right now, not many of them have access to another computer running Leopard to try this out, and thus think it doesn't work at all. Quite understandable.
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:18 AM   #23
FJ218700
macrumors 68000
 
FJ218700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blue Dot, Red State
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoreanGrae View Post
They'll get that $160 one way or another.
they're already gotten 10x that over the years. I should qualify for a free one or something
__________________
Lab: 3.0 ghz octo MP
Mobile: 1.33 ghz 12' PB
twitter.com/Dr_H
twitter.com/TapeSlave
FJ218700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:19 AM   #24
DoreanGrae
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJ218700 View Post
they're already gotten 10x that over the years. I should qualify for a free one or something
How about free shipping at the online store?
__________________
DoreanGrae
2.16 GHz MacBook Pro, 2 GB RAM
16GB iPhone 3G
DoreanGrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 10:28 AM   #25
PhatBoyG
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Send a message via AIM to PhatBoyG Send a message via Yahoo to PhatBoyG Send a message via Skype™ to PhatBoyG
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoreanGrae View Post
They'll get that $160 one way or another.
Or they'll get your $1600 when you buy a new Al iMac and a 1TB USB drive.
PhatBoyG is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > Apple Software > Mac OS X Forums > Mac OS X

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC