Since this new 3g phone is a 'world' phone, I can't imagine that apple wouldn't do something like they did with the current GSM bands (850,900,1800,1900) having it include all bands used currently (I don't believe 450 is still used, but I could be wrong). So to 'future proof' the 3G iPhone wouldn't they include all 3G bands? 2100, 1700, etc.?
T-Mobile USA is using a different frequency than AT&T, and from what I've read, it is also different than most overseas carriers as well. Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but a quad-band HSDPA phone won't work on T-Mobile 3G but it would on AT&T, because AT&T is using one of the traditional HSDPA bands while T-Mobile bought a different one because that was what was available at auction.
Assuming all that is true, no amount of hacking is going to get it onto T-Mobile USA, because Apple will not be covering every single radio frequency. Most likely the iPhone will have a radio that covers quad band HSDPA, which is what would work worldwide (except T-Mobile USA since they bought off-band frequencies).
If T-Mobile IS using a traditional band, then yes it will work. I'd research long and hard on what T-Mobile is using, because I thought it was a different band than everyone else.
There are some overlap, but mostly no. If you're on T-mo just get a current gen iPhone and call it a day.
yes.
it will.
the iphone (the new version!) will be released worldwide with many many different 3g networks and frequencies. it may need to be hacked (who knows) but im pputting it on the table that yes it will work.
i am in Australia and we have providers running two different 3g frequencies (telstra 850mhz and the rest running whatever they run)
ATT is running 850mhz too i believe. but Optus has just claimed the reseller privileges, so it WONT be 850mhz for Australia
Since this new 3g phone is a 'world' phone, I can't imagine that apple wouldn't do something like they did with the current GSM bands (850,900,1800,1900) having it include all bands used currently (I don't believe 450 is still used, but I could be wrong). So to 'future proof' the 3G iPhone wouldn't they include all 3G bands? 2100, 1700, etc.?
T-mobile = 1700/2100
AT&T = 1900/2100
There are some overlap, but mostly no. If you're on T-mo just get a current gen iPhone and call it a day.
you both are making a HUGE assumption that apple will release 1 global iphone model with quadband 3G (850/1700/1900/2100). i dont think AT&T would be too happy with apple for selling the 3G iphone with 1700mhz that makes it even easier to jailbreak and go to t-mobile. what is most likely is a US spec iphone with US 3G (850/1900) and then a EURO spec iphone with EURO 3G (2100) to protect AT&T's exclusivity.
the only way i could see apple putting 1700mhz on the iphone is for european t-mobile users to use when they visit the US. this would be on a EURO spec iphone not sold in the US.
AT&T currently sells the SE Z750, which has tri-band 3G (850/1700/2100).
...that AT&T has a 5 year exclusive deal with.
Thanks for all the helpful information
Has this ever been proven? are there documents to support this, or is this just assumed? I have always heard this, but never heard the source for this info.
and what does this mean:
from Wikipedia, 2100 (downlink) / 1700 (uplink) for America (e.g. T-Mobile USA). Is this the same 2100mhz band as AT&T using?
way to entirely miss the point. it is NOT a matter of "can they do it?" it is a matter of "why in the world would they?". the issue here is that AT&T has an exclusive deal with apple. t-mobile is the ONLY carrier in the world that currently uses 1700mhz. for AT&T to sell an iphone in the US with 1700mhz would be retarded because it would NOT be useable on their own network.
who cares if the SE Z750 has 1700mhz, its not a high profile phone that AT&T has a 5 year exclusive deal with.
Doesn't matter. Fact of the matter is, I don't think AT&T is going to CARE. AT&T and T-mobile use different GSM bands in the US, and you didn't see them/Cingular balking at the RAZR being quad-band.
Also, T-mobile not getting the iPhone any time soon is SPECULATION, not FACT. Unless you're Steve Jobs, it's speculation. I acknowledge AT&T having an exclusivity agreement, but things can change.
In addition, neobond was asking what the quote from Wikipedia was saying and inquiring if AT&T uses it. Way to miss (the first part of) the point.
Actually Cingular had exclusivity of the RAZR for the first few months of its release. IF AT&T wanted to protect their exclusivity of the iPhone, they would have done more in regards to jailbreaking.
Furthemore, T-mobile's 3G network in the US is for voice only, in case you haven't been keeping up with the news.