Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:01 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Multi-Core ARM (iPhone) Chips Due in 2010



CNet reports that ARM will be delivering multi-core ARM chips in 2010, making multi-core iPhones and other smart phones possible.
Quote:
"You'll definitely see handsets shipping with a dual-core A9 in 2010," James Bruce, wireless segment manager for ARM, said in a phone interview earlier this week, referring to the next-generation Cortex-A9 processor from ARM.
The iPhone currently is believed to use the ARM Cortex A8 processor. While still a notable improvement over the previous generation ARM chips, it remains a single core device. The move to dual-core ARM chips is expected to happen "relatively quickly" and should be seen in about a year.

An ARM representative reassured CNet that the dual-core ARM A9 is actually more power efficient than the A8.
Quote:
"What we've done on the A9 is actually make it more power efficient than the A8. The dual-core A9 will be coming out on 45-nanometer rather than the (current) 65-nanometer process," Bruce said. Generally, the smaller the geometries, the faster and more power-efficient the processor is.
Bruce continued. "With the dual-core running at maximum load there's probably going to be an increase of about 10 to 20 percent in power consumption but in general day to day use you're actually going to see better battery life."
Article Link: Multi-Core ARM (iPhone) Chips Due in 2010
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:01 PM   #2
theheadguy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: california
Send a message via AIM to theheadguy
Can't wait till these make it into the iPhones / Pres
theheadguy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:02 PM   #3
nemaslov
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco
See! All you who got pissy about the upgrade price, can now happily wait until your time comes and buy a faster iPhone next year. But then everyone who purchased the 3GS now will get pissy because THEY won't get the new phone cheaper next year. Oh well . Round and round we spin.
__________________
Agent man
nemaslov is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:02 PM   #4
MistaBungle
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Didn't that one guy make a post saying that the next iPhone, as in next year, would be the one with the jaw-dropping upgrades? I think this fits the bill.
__________________
went to school and got a degree in rocket appliance
MistaBungle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:02 PM   #5
casik
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta
exactally while I am waiting for the model after trhe 3GS
casik is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:06 PM   #6
alphatectz
macrumors 6502a
 
alphatectz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, NY
now this is why i sold my 2g and 3g and stuck with a blackberry bold.
__________________
32GB apple iPhone 4

MRoogle has your answers.
alphatectz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:07 PM   #7
casik
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphatectz View Post
now this is why i sold my 2g and 3g and stuck with a blackberry bold.
The bold is alright, but any blackberry is still a royal pain to sync with a mac. RIM should get on it and make their own software for that.

Yes I have used pocketsync when I had my 8900, but still was a pain. There is nothing better than an iPhone and MobileMe.
casik is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:07 PM   #8
reckless2k2
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Yeah, this is great for those crying about having to pay the unsubsidized price for the 3GS. They can wait another year for dual core.

I will be paying the unsubsidized price for that model but you won't hear me complain.
__________________
Not sent from my iPhone, iPod Touch, or iPad.
reckless2k2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:08 PM   #9
iCantwait
macrumors 65816
 
iCantwait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
ok, no 3GS for me
__________________
There truly is something beautiful about seeing a 5gb iPod plugged into an iBook
iCantwait is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:08 PM   #10
InTheUnion
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
When this happens will Apple start bragging about specs? or will they do what they're doing with the 3G[S]?
__________________
Last.fm
InTheUnion is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:09 PM   #11
TSX
macrumors 68030
 
TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
The next iPhone isn't going to have multi-core processors, because the 3gS was being tested back in Oct/Nov 2008. And with the multi core coming out in 2010 that won't be enough time to test it. I'm guessing they will start testing the next iPhone later this year.
TSX is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:09 PM   #12
SatanLover
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
everybody that bought a first generation iphone and skipped the 3g to get a 3gs is going to cry when the 4th generation iphone comes out. 3g was a big upgrade to the first generation. 3gs isn't as big of an upgrade to the 3g
SatanLover is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:10 PM   #13
JonHimself
macrumors 68000
 
JonHimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Perhaps this is reflective of how much time I spend on these boards but I am somewhat saddened knowing that it's only a matter of time before we see 1) "The 'Unofficial' I'm Waiting For A Multi-Core iPhone Thread" and 2) An unnecessary number of threads about how outraged people are that Apple is going to make their brand new 3G S phone obsolete and they'll have to pay full price just to get the latest piece of tech.
__________________
shambo, Changing the definition of "future proof" since April 2009.
JonHimself is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:11 PM   #14
alphatectz
macrumors 6502a
 
alphatectz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless2k2 View Post
Yeah, this is great for those crying about having to pay the unsubsidized price for the 3GS. They can wait another year for dual core.

I will be paying the unsubsidized price for that model but you won't hear me complain.
+1, this is when i will go back to the iphone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by casik View Post
The bold is alright, but any blackberry is still a royal pain to sync with a mac. RIM should get on it and make their own software for that.

Yes I have used pocketsync when I had my 8900, but still was a pain. There is nothing better than an iPhone and MobileMe.
i agree, i have a mac and a pc, i used my pc for my blackberry and my mac for the iphone that i used to have.
i never liked mobile me it always erased my data and contacts and so on.
__________________
32GB apple iPhone 4

MRoogle has your answers.
alphatectz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:12 PM   #15
derek1984
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
What 3GS? That was so yesterday.
__________________
17" Macbook Pro. 2.93 GHz. 4GB RAM. 320 GB HD 7200 RPM. Anti-Glare | Verizon iPad 3 | iPhone 4 16GB
derek1984 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:13 PM   #16
Lenxal
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatanLover View Post
everybody that bought a first generation iphone and skipped the 3g to get a 3gs is going to cry when the 4th generation iphone comes out. 3g was a big upgrade to the first generation. 3gs isn't as big of an upgrade to the 3g
No, the 3gs is a big upgrade from the 3g.
3g just added 3g, gps, plastic covering, and little other stuff while 3gs brought a lot more.
just because they look the same doesn't mean it is the same.
Lenxal is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:13 PM   #17
JonHimself
macrumors 68000
 
JonHimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSX View Post
The next iPhone isn't going to have multi-core processors, because the 3gS was being tested back in Oct/Nov 2008. And with the multi core coming out in 2010 that won't be enough time to test it. I'm guessing they will start testing the next iPhone later this year.
Or maybe bump back the release from July to Sept/Oct in order to accomodate the supposed timetable for these? Maybe we'll see a refresh in March or so to 32gb/64gb capacities (is that reasonable? I don't know where these chips are in terms of price/avail.) and then a proper refresh after the summer.
__________________
shambo, Changing the definition of "future proof" since April 2009.
JonHimself is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:15 PM   #18
kyleb822
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
and this is exactly why I didn't upgrade to a 3GS and stuck with my 3G, the update in 2010 will be huge compared to the one this year from the 3G to the 3GS
__________________
Macbook Pro 2.5 GHz, iPhone 5 32GB Black, iPad 3 LTE 16GB
kyleb822 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:16 PM   #19
eastercat
macrumors 68040
 
eastercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX
By the time they come out with 128 GB, that's gonna be one fast sucka.
__________________
64 GB space grey iPhone 5S (AT&T); 16 GB space grey iPad retina mini (Verizon with T-Mobile sim); 2008 MBP 17" 2.5 GHz Penryn, 4GB RAM, 250GB HD 5400 rpm, 1920x1200 matte LED
eastercat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:16 PM   #20
casik
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphatectz View Post
+1, this is when i will go back to the iphone.



i agree, i have a mac and a pc, i used my pc for my blackberry and my mac for the iphone that i used to have.
i never liked mobile me it always erased my data and contacts and so on.
hmmm... well it will erase them if you don't have them on your computer. it does give you a warning on your phone before you sync it for the first time saying it will erase what is on your phone and replace it with what is "in the coulds" so to speak...

sync your phone with your comp, your comp with MobileMe, and then your mobile me with your phone... it works well for me! I used to have to plug my phone into the comp everytime i wanted my calander to sync and it was annoying. some days i don't sit down at the comp... i just like the push calander (among lots of other features)

anyways to keep on topic I hope the model after the 3Gs has dual core...
casik is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:17 PM   #21
Lenxal
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb822 View Post
and this is exactly why I didn't upgrade to a 3GS and stuck with my 3G, the update in 2010 will be huge compared to the one this year from the 3G to the 3GS
Haha, and then people can say thats why they didn't upgrade to the 2010 iphone because the 2011 will be een bigger than the 2010.
Lenxal is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:17 PM   #22
JonHimself
macrumors 68000
 
JonHimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenxal View Post
No, the 3gs is a big upgrade from the 3g.
3g just added 3g, gps, plastic covering, and little other stuff while 3gs brought a lot more.
just because they look the same doesn't mean it is the same.
I guess it depends on what you use your phone for. If you've been looking for video editing the 3G S is HUGE! However, if you wanted a convergence device to get rid of the GPS in your car then the 3G was also HUGE (bad example because of the GPS improvements in 3G S, but hopefully my point is somewhat clear).
As much as I want a better camera and video, for now I can tolerate not trying to upgrade my 3G to a 3G s (for now, that may change when I see people using the cool features) but that's just me... I'm sure there are tons of people who deperately want to upgrade to the 3G S from their 3G just as there were from the original to the 3G
__________________
shambo, Changing the definition of "future proof" since April 2009.
JonHimself is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:17 PM   #23
iGeRmAn
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatanLover View Post
3g was a big upgrade to the first generation. 3gs isn't as big of an upgrade to the 3g
Are you joking ???
iGeRmAn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:18 PM   #24
eastercat
macrumors 68040
 
eastercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonHimself View Post
Maybe we'll see a refresh in March or so to 32gb/64gb capacities (is that reasonable? I don't know where these chips are in terms of price/avail.) and then a proper refresh after the summer.
Personally, I don't recall Apple doing a refresh or capacity bump before WWDC. However, there's a first time for everything.
__________________
64 GB space grey iPhone 5S (AT&T); 16 GB space grey iPad retina mini (Verizon with T-Mobile sim); 2008 MBP 17" 2.5 GHz Penryn, 4GB RAM, 250GB HD 5400 rpm, 1920x1200 matte LED
eastercat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 16, 2009, 01:18 PM   #25
labrats5
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Yeah.....

I don't believe this for a second. I remember them saying that cortex-A8 phones would be coming out end of 2007, then mid 2008. Now It is mid 2009 and we have exactly 1 cortex-A8 phone on the market (the palm pre) with the iphone about to follow. next-gen ARM phones never deliver on time. They can't, because there are too many people involved. There is ARM itself, which designs the core. Then there is TI, Samsung and many others who then build an actual SOC around the core, which in itself is dependent on many other factors. Then there are the device manufacturers who need to integrate these cores into their products. And this isn't exactly a drop-in die replacement we're talking about: these smartphones are herculean efforts of engineering.

No silicon vendor is sampling cortex-A9 chips, not even in limited quantities. It takes roughly a year from sampling to an actual svelte smartphone. I would say that 2011 is optimistic, 2010 unrealistic.
labrats5 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Support for Marvell Quad-Core ARM Chips Found in Xcode MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 31 Sep 26, 2011 10:22 PM
SSD limitations due to SATA II in 2010 iMac? Florida Gator iMac 8 Aug 2, 2011 01:50 AM
Expansion card length in 2010 MP? DanielCoffey Mac Pro 11 Feb 7, 2011 03:57 PM
First Intel Penryn Chips Due in 2007? MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 136 Aug 9, 2007 12:59 PM
Intel's 45nm Chip due in 2007 MacBytes MacRumors News Discussion (archive) 119 Jan 30, 2006 06:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC