|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Intel may release new Nehalem chips next month
Quote:
Does anyone have an idea if Apple will utilize these processors for potential upgrades to their pro and consumer lines? And when would we begin to see the launch of these upgraded Macs? Are we expecting Jobs to be making any presentations in the next few months? Last edited by Morriss : Jul 14, 2009 at 05:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Switzerland, ZG
|
I could imagine it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Sounds like a very possible thing.
__________________
15" Unibody MacBook Pro (Mid '09), 2.53 GHz, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD, Mac OS X Snow Leopard; iPhone 3GS 32GB Visit TheQuantumByte for Apple, Mac and Tech News and Tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
|
The Mac Pro would get the Lynnfield then? It is supposed to be a cost saver with turbo boost capability but still a 45 nm manufacturing width.
It would require a new logic board design and be introduced less than 12 months after Nehalem. Going by Apple's upgrade rythms of Pros in the last years I would be very sceptical that they will do it. I think the might go for the 32 nm Westmere die shrink of Nehalem early next year.
__________________
MP4,1●3,33GHz Octad●160GB SSD RAID0●12GB RAM●ARC-1210●Blu-Ray●FireDTV-S2●SL/Win7-64 uMBP●160GB SSD●SL/Seven64 TC 2TB iPhone●16GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Switzerland, ZG
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I agree with gugucom. Apple would most probably wait for 32-mm Westmere before any updates on the MP. It's the same with the Harpertowns maxing out at 3.2GHz for the 2008 MPs when Intel launched the 3.4GHz variant 8 months after the latter's introduction, Apple skipped that and 6 more months later came Nehalem.
__________________
Mac Pro 2.66GHz 8-core Nehalem, 10GB RAM, 4.14TB Combined HDD, nVidia GT 120 512MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Japan...at the waters edge...
|
...what ever chip they use, it needs to be kept cool...
__________________
20" iMac w/ 4GB RAM & HP2009m dual display, S.D.B AEBS, iPod Touch 16GB G12.0 Ghz Nvidia 9400M whitebook 4GB RAM & WD 320GB HDD PC's: Dell Dimension 8100 2.0Ghz P4 w/ 2GB RAM, eeePC 1000H |
|
|
|
| J&JPolangin |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by J&JPolangin |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Surfing around:
Last edited by Tesselator : Jul 14, 2009 at 07:27 AM. |
|
|
|
| Tesselator |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tesselator |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Lynnfield is a mainstream desktop part and therefore irrelevant to Apple who only uses mobile or Xeon parts.
Clarksfield is the mobile variant which is much more relevant. There is no new Xeon part being released (until Westmere sometime next year) and so nothing of interest to Mac Pro users. I suspect Apple will choose to pass on Clarksfield for now and instead wait for the 32nm die shrink early next year which will enable on-die GPU... however, it's unlikely Intel's GPU will come close to the current nVidia GPU in terms of performance. Regardless of who's GPU is better, Apple may have no choice but to use Intel's GPU since Nvidia so far has not successfully negotiated a QPI license to enable them to produce chips compatible with Intel's new CPU's. Things are going to get interesting... that's for sure.
__________________
Mac Pro (2009 Quad), Mac Mini (2009), MacBook Air (Rev A), iPhone (3G)
|
|
|
|
| VirtualRain |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by VirtualRain |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
|
Yes there is. Likely to be 3.06 and 3.33 as they are the only speeds not available for 5500 Xeons, and would match Core i7s on the single socket front. I don't for a minute expect them in a Mac Pro though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I have a feeling new speed bumps on the nehalem mac pros due this nov.
![]() 2.66Ghz 8 core will be the new 8 core base model. And hopefully a lowered price tag comes along with it down to $2799. 2.26GHz-->2.6GHz @ $2799 2.66GHz--->2.93GHz @ $3499 2.93GHz--->3.2GHz @ $4299
__________________
2.26GHz 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro, ATI 4870, 16GB RAM, WD3000HLFS Raptor + 24" LED ACD (on an ergotron MX arm) 17" 2.8GHz MBP |
|
|
|
| jjahshik32 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by jjahshik32 |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
The Macworld article confuses me a bit.
I thought that all nehalem gainestown (5500) processors had been released. I understand the bit about Bloomfield, Lynnfield, and Clarksfield chipsets being released or updated, but the part about adding to the Gainestown and Bloomfield server chips (5500 and 3500 respectively) either is incorrect or means that Intel has some updates beyond what has already been published. Am I somehow misinformed here? If there is indeed going to be an update of the 5500 and 3500 chips, then it is possible that Apple could update the Mac Pro line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
|
VirtualRain, that makes a lot more sense to me. They will go six cores then with integrated graphics. Wow, that will probably mean the traditional dual CPU design will have 12 cores and 2 GPUs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_N...roarchitecture)
__________________
MP4,1●3,33GHz Octad●160GB SSD RAID0●12GB RAM●ARC-1210●Blu-Ray●FireDTV-S2●SL/Win7-64 uMBP●160GB SSD●SL/Seven64 TC 2TB iPhone●16GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
@jjahshik32 and wally21... Unless Intel drops prices significantly on the entire line and slots the new clock speeds in at existing price points (which is unlikely), Apple will not likely change the Mac Pro configuration.
__________________
Mac Pro (2009 Quad), Mac Mini (2009), MacBook Air (Rev A), iPhone (3G)
|
|
|
|
|
| VirtualRain |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by VirtualRain |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Well, I did say that they "could" update the Mac Pro line. I'm not sure that I expect them to.
I just didn't think that there were going to be any completely new processors, but I suppose that they could just bump up the speeds on what is currently available. I'm gunning for a new mac pro and will probably purchase in August, just before school starts. I've been seriously considering upgrading the processors, post-purchase, and will probably upgrade to a 3.33Ghz processor if that becomes available. Speed is very important to me as I am heavily involved in rendering and graphics, so my dream is to have a 3.2/3.33 Ghz mac pro with 32 Gb RAM and a workstation graphics card (hopefully an nvidia quadro) I've been saving up for it, but I have a feeling that the final config. cost might make me back off a bit. We'll see |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The world of Macmatics, flying with my calculator…
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| iMacmatician |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by iMacmatician |
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Tesselator |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tesselator |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.ph...n_the_horizon/ I know..., perhaps not as exciting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: May 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
|
|
|
|
| Tesselator |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tesselator |
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: May 2008
|
Quote:
![]() I can see it now... "911 EMERGENCY: What is the nature of the problem?" "CALLER: We've found someone lying in the floor puking up blood and electronics." "911 EMERGENCY: ....Umm...Is this a joke?!?...If this is a prank call...." "CALLER: No ma'am, it's not. We found someone who ate a computer! Please send an ambulance." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Mmmmm chips and dip!
|
|
|
|
| Tesselator |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tesselator |
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: May 2008
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|