|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
|
Still can't decide - 13" MBP or 15" MBP
Despite looking at both machines in an Apple store on a number of occasions, I still cannot decide on which size MBP to go for – I did like the idea of the 13” although do not need to consider portability – it will be my personal machine used 95% of the time at home. My computing-use will be relatively light and well within the 13” capabilities spec-wise, I’m just concerned about screen real-estate (particularly as I won’t be hooking up to a monitor).
I’ll be using the machine for web browsing, email, itunes & occasional spreadsheet & documents – no gaming. So it would appear I don’t need to go for the greater graphics capability of the 9400+9600, and I don’t have a ton of stuff that’s going to require huge HDD – I’ll stick with whatever the chosen machine comes with and consider SSD upgrade at some future point if prices tumble. As I’ve said seeing the two machines in the metal hasn’t helped sway me in a particular direction as I would have hoped. I’ve gone pixel-blind reading the myriad of “do you regret buying 13”.....”wished I’d bought 13” threads, and still remain undecided!!! I think I’ve distilled it down to simply a matter of screen area / resolution. I believe the resolution is higher on the 15” MBP, so pro-rata you’re getting even more on-screen that the simply size increase? That correct? All other factors (processor, HDD size, “portability” etc) don’t figure too highly as the “decider” due to what I’ll be using the MBP for and “where” – around the house mainly, not lugging around every day. Appreciate views & comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Personally I'd go for the 15inch if you can afford it. Spreadsheets can be huge at times and the 13inch screen will be restrictive. Furthermore, with the higher specs, you're more future-proofed in that hopefully you won't need to upgrade to a new machine as early due to sluggish performance.
I went for the 17inch a few years ago and going back to even a 15inch screen feels restrictive, let alone a 13inch. To me, the only real advantage of the 13inch is portability, and maybe a cuteness factor. Since the former isn't an issue and seeing both machines in the metal didn't sway you in terms of the latter, I'd go the 15inch. Sure, your needs might not require it now, but the future-proofing idea is what makes me get the higher specs.
__________________
MBP 2.5GHz, 4GB MBA 1.6GHz with 20' ACD iPhone 16GB (white) iPod Touch 16GB (1G)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 4 8 15 16 23 42
|
look at the refurb store... you can get a 15" like new for the same price as a 13" and if your mostly using it at home 15" makes more sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| jointsmoking |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by jointsmoking |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Since you mentioned:
1) You'd be using this laptop 95% at home (portability not a factor really) and 2) Not going to hook it up to an external monitor leads me to think a 15" would fit your needs better. I have both a 15" and 13" unibody at home and I definately notice the screen size/resolution difference side by side. The 15" is not too bad as a standalone monitor with no external. Like others have mentioned, you can get a refurb Macbook Pro 15" (last gen with removeable battery) for like $1349 direct from Apple's Refurb store. I'd give you a link but the Apple online store is down now as they're probably adding the listings for the new Ipods coming out today come 1PM EST announcement. Good luck with your search.
__________________
Macbook White Unibody: 2.26GHz, 2GB RAM, 500GB HDD (Mine) Limited Edition Aluminum Macbook: 2.4GHz, 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD (Hers)
|
|
|
|
| hellfire88 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by hellfire88 |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
I can only tell you my experience. 15" is cramped for editing photos, I would consider it the bare minimum for me. It is a little heavier to carry around though. If it lives primarily in one location, I wouldn't even consider the 13". Just my .02.
__________________
Flickr, 2.5 GHz MBP, 20D, 24-105, 17-85, 70-200 2.8 IS, 2x, 50 1.8, 430EX, AB1600, AB800 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I had a 13" macbook, and last year I bought a 15" MBP. The change in real estate is the biggest thing for me. Design is nice etc but it just has more usable space, especially as I like having the dock visible at all times (on the left usually)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arkansas
|
15
Go with the 15" if you can. You will enjoy the extra screen real estate.
__________________
32 GB iPhone 3GS 15" UMBP 24" LED Cinema Display:"Born to Mac" |
|
|
|
| borntomac448 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by borntomac448 |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Well if money isn't a concern, which it doesn't seem to be as you didn't mention it I would say go with the 15''. That being said I bought a 13'' because for me a laptop is all about portability if I wanted a computer with a big screen and really high specs I would buy/build another desktop. Although I have been impressed with the capabilities of my 13''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Is money a factor?
__________________
"If I wanted an Apple phone, would I be looking at an iPod touch? If I didn't want to pay a $2000 contract, would I be looking at an iPhone?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
I just got a 13" but I have it plugged into a monitor most of the time... I would say if you're not planning on plugging it into a monitor you def need the 15".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
I was thinking like you awhile back. I was lost but now I'm found. I'm using a mini port to HDMI cable to connect my Mac pro 13" into my Samsung 32" HD and will tell you I'm blowing myself away. No more second guessing for me. The cable cost me $17.00 and is well worth it.
Save your money towards something else, HDD & memory upgrade. you'll be glad you did. This little baby rocks. |
|
|
|
| silentnite |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by silentnite |
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
In my opinion, the true decision is between the 13" and 17". Portability = 13, screen real estate = 17.
The 15" doesn't offer much of a step up from the 13 that makes up for the larger size/footprint. The 17" really isn't that much bigger than the 15" and the resolution/screen real estate increase is out of this world ... If you can tote around the 15, you can manage the 17. There are many threads on this topic, do a search on my username and you'll see a bunch from a couple of months ago .. eV
__________________
I just found my lost 12" Powerbook!!! http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=769216 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
the resolution of the 15" is bad enough, the 13" would drive me crazy
|
|
|
|
| stainlessliquid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by stainlessliquid |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
If you go portable a lot or plan on it, go with the 13. As many have said, the difference is negligible. I have a 13 inch myself and have no objections. I even went from a 14 inch and find it very nice. I don't know if you want to go all out for the 17 or just get a desktop. For the price the iMac would be a better deal for the price.
__________________
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. " -Einstein |
|
|
|
| Corrosive vinyl |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Corrosive vinyl |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
I think you hit the nail on the head. If screen real estate is your primary goal, you really need at least a 17 inch screen. |
|
|
|
|
| jointsmoking |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by jointsmoking |
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
To the OP: read these threads in the order below 1. 13,15,17 screen resolution comparisons to show you how little the 15 offers over the 13 http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=716327 2. Once you decide the 13 doesn't work, here's a thread that debates the 15 vs 17 http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=767473 http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=728718 3. Another thread with the exact same topic as yours. You really should have done a quick search ![]() http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=713816 Go with the 17 if you can handle the drop in portability (compared to the 13). It's a fantastic machine eV
__________________
I just found my lost 12" Powerbook!!! http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=769216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
You say you'll be using this machine at home "95%" of the time so my question is does this even need to be portable? I'm inclined to say skip the portables and get a 20" iMac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
A desktop is good for general family use, media server, a super high powered Mac Pro (because they're so bloody cool) but in my case, I have a very powerful notebook with the screen real estate of the 24" iMac that isn't chained to a desk. I would even recommend a 13" with an external screen if you need a 'desktop' eV
__________________
I just found my lost 12" Powerbook!!! http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=769216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
|
Thanks for all the responses guys, decided to go with 15".
eVolcre - tried a few searches but didn't find the thread you pulled out - thanks. Yep, although I won't be taking the machine to work/college everyday, no way i can sit at a desk at home (do that all day at work!), so portability means i can sit out in the garden during the 4 days of "summer" we get here in the N/E of UK!, and on the sofa, bedroom etc. And correctly-guessed, price wasn't a factor, hence it wasn't mentioned. Now I'm just dreading the "self-compatability-issues" with having to work on a Windows-PC during the day, and Mac-loveliness at home! |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Birmingham, England
|
I went from a 15" to a 13" years ago and haven't looked back since. Just prefer the form/factor for me.
I've switched machines a few times since and always stuck to the 13". I really don't think the difference in real estate is huge. Got to your local store and compare... seriously. That said, if money isn't an object and you're not fussed about portability, the the 15" might be best for you. At the end of the day it's a personal decision and nobody on here can tell you what you want. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
It's your machine and your money but I am curious ... eV
__________________
I just found my lost 12" Powerbook!!! http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=769216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Caucasus
|
As most of the other posters have suggested, and going on what you said your needs/preferences were, the 15" sounds better. To me, (I have one) it is the perfect combination of portability and quality. Besides, ease for the eyes, and quality (and size) of screen matter, and for these the 15" is a fair bit better than the 13". Well done and may you enjoy it.
Cheers and good luck |
|
|
|
| Scepticalscribe |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Scepticalscribe |
|
|
#24 | |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Now I know a 4~6 year old design PC laptop is no comparison to sleek 17" MBP, but I still feel sitting on the sofa, lounging on bed, that machine is too big. I was really, really tempted with the small, neat form-factor of the 13" esp. as spec-wise it's fine for me. And OK I know the keyboard is the same size as 15", but I used to PREFER typing on smaller devices until I finally had to succumb and get a laptop for work. Psion series 5 - LOVED typing on that thing - actually pretty-much how I taught myself to [almost] touch-type - no "hunt & peck" for me. BUT, fact is the resolution is a little better on 15" vs. 13", and I feel that's going to be the one thing I would regret with 13"..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
eV
__________________
I just found my lost 12" Powerbook!!! http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=769216 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|